Posted by plankgatan
thought i post some big nice sharp C905 pics
all pics is posted in 1024 x 768.
_________________
I
K850, 
W810 & 
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 09:22 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2010-09-15 15:52 ]
Posted by razec
Isn't this thread too early to be created?
btw, i loved the second pic very much, it still shows the 8 megapixel details(albeit some excessive N-R application) in purple fringing-free environment.
Posted by PeterKay
lovely pics but way too early.
Posted by JiSm
Haha, clever man! Noone else can post pics in here for ages! - Still, what amazing pics man. (I have K850 - so I guess any other pics look amazing HAHA)
Posted by darknoob
my K850 by C905
full size:
http://www.jup.co.il/files/d121cc28a0.jpg
Posted by strizlow800
Yeah, the outdoor shots taken with C905 are awesome
Posted by Wizardz
It seems like either the indoor or close up shot aren't that clear. You'll see some distortion.
Posted by razec
On 2008-06-25 06:31:55, Wizardz wrote:
It seems like either the indoor or close up shot aren't that clear. You'll see some distortion.
Close up shots were also taken indoors, and indoor shots are typically noisy(that's if the software N-R is not present) unless N-R is applied and result to detail loss just like what many brands are doing
Posted by ch33sehead
On 2008-06-24 12:20:32, darknoob wrote:
my K850 by C905
full size:
http://www.jup.co.il/files/d121cc28a0.jpg
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
Posted by Alf Nif
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
Posted by NightBlade
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
Posted by Alf Nif
On 2008-06-27 09:45:37, NightBlade wrote:
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
I haven't played with any cybershot phone at all.. My latest phone is the Z610.
Now I gotto find out if I want the G900 or C905.
I think I'd go for design and get the C905...
Sorry, just realised I got off topic
_________________
Alf Nif
formerly known as seiunUsagi
[ This Message was edited by: Alf Nif on 2008-06-27 08:50 ]
Posted by ch33sehead
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
No, I just peeked at the EXIF data on darknoob's photo. I don't own the C905 myself.
Somehow I doubt they will put manual controls on a cell phone.
Posted by Arne Anka
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
In another thread it was concluded the C905 darknoob used is an older prototype (low light pictures taken with newer protos seem to be less grainy).
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Most cybershot phones (at lest the more high-end one) usually have image stabilizer. But nothing fancy as optical or sensor-shifting. Cybershots only lowers the ISO when image stabilizer is enabled to my best knowledge.
Posted by pravin_i
how u got c905?
Posted by tranced
On 2008-06-27 17:49:31, pravin_i wrote:
how u got c905?
Posted by darknoob
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
On 2008-06-24 12:20:32, darknoob wrote:
my K850 by C905
full size:
http://www.jup.co.il/files/d121cc28a0.jpg
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
Look at this sample that I took:
http://www.upit.ws/uploads/8da6fcecdb69a.jpg
http://www.upit.ws/uploads/8b1b3c539e5be.jpg
the details are stunning
[ This Message was edited by: darknoob on 2008-06-27 17:36 ]
Posted by ch33sehead
Like I said, darknoob, it's really good for a cell phone.
However, it is not comparable to a decent compact camera. In fact, I don't believe the quality is better than the K750 or K800. It seems the sensor size remained the same--they just upped the megapixels, which reduces the photosite size.
[ This Message was edited by: ch33sehead on 2008-06-27 22:57 ]
Posted by carkitter
Great pictures as usual Plankgatan
I'm very jealous that you get access to a C905, even a proto... 
Posted by Arne Anka
On 2008-06-27 23:49:24, ch33sehead wrote:
In fact, I don't believe the quality is better than the K750 or K800.
Have you seen a 2/3 MP pic taken (or shrunk to 2/3 MP) with C905 compared with K750/K800 to determine that ?
On 2008-06-27 23:49:24, ch33sehead wrote:
It seems the sensor size remained the same--they just upped the megapixels, which reduces the photosite size.
If that was the case the noise and loss of details would have increased (probably alot), not decreased (or styed at same level) as is the case now.
Posted by calypso1595
The phone isn't released yet
Posted by Raiderski
Great pictures as usual Plankgatan I'm very jealous that you get access to a C905, even a proto...
I'm very jealous that you get access to a C905, even a proto... he found them on net, so you don't have to be jealous
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-07-02 08:39 ]
Posted by plankgatan
more c905 pics
good one for a indoor
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-02 09:52 ]
Posted by Sony α
Not half bad, shame about the car though!
Seems Red is now Red, and not a sickly pink conversion! Nice one SEMC! Or should I say SEMCJ?
_________________
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
www.mypumas.net
Sony PlayStation 3 ID:
mypumas
[ This Message was edited by: Sony α on 2008-07-02 10:35 ]
Posted by plankgatan
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-18 10:28 ]
Posted by QVGA
oh so you created this thread so you can 'own' the official thread even though this thread shouldnt be here in the first place.
next i'll make a thread 'post pictures taken with a SE C1010
Posted by plankgatan
yeh, you right as allways.
more pics.
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-18 10:31 ]
Posted by 843
They look pretty bland compared to INNOV8's sample photos...
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i8510_innov8-review-269p4.php
Posted by plankgatan
i like this new c905 pics.... very sharp
but strangley i still think C902 produce better colors. (C905 might use a beta fw of course....)
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-19 22:32 ]
Posted by naveedaziz83
@plank
frm which website u got those new pics of c905 from??
care to tell
Posted by chombos1
On 2008-06-27 12:15:42, Arne Anka wrote:
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Most cybershot phones (at lest the more high-end one) usually have image stabilizer. But nothing fancy as optical or sensor-shifting. Cybershots only lowers the ISO when image stabilizer is enabled to my best knowledge.
it's just software stabilization...
in stabilizer mode.. the picture has about 20 to 30 pixels less than the normal one from each side...
those grey spaces will be reserved for your slight hand moves... the Stabilized!!! pic will then be always in the green area... as far as your hand movements don't touch the boundaries of the grey area...
Posted by Raiderski
nave
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]yericsson-c905-camera-en.shtml
http://www.smape.com/en/revie[....]ony_Ericsson_C905-prev_en.html
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-20 19:51 ]
Posted by plankgatan
some more lovely c905 pics... i do have to say that c902 still produce little clearer pictures. (the colors are little more vibrant on c902....but c905 starts to looks very good, it will likely ends up better then c902.
my favo picture by c905..this is sick sharpness
it blow samsung 8510 back to stoneage...
jodidlahaoooo...100% crop
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-25 20:33 ]
Posted by masada1971
awesome quality man...just awesome.
Posted by Amras
The dynamic range is really, really good.
Posted by Raiderski
and these pictures are property of ...? don't you think that's not nice to copy pictures without basic information about the author or even link to original files?
Posted by goldenface
Simply amazing. Hard to see how it could be improved actually.
Posted by darknoob
amazing, I hope I'll be able to get this phone when it'll be out.
[ This Message was edited by: darknoob on 2008-09-26 12:04 ]
Posted by borg_
Great Pics
Posted by AbuBasim
On 2008-09-26 10:46:19, Raiderski wrote:
and these pictures are property of ...? don't you think that's not nice to copy pictures without basic information about the author or even link to original files?
I see that markusradecker has "© All rights reserved." on his photos. So I can assume that plankis asked for permission to copy his photos?! Otherwise I think a moderator should remove them. Am I right?
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-09-26 10:10 ]
Posted by Raiderski
that's exactly what I want to know. we are all excited about C905 but these pictures shouldn't be published here without permission from author. moreover they shouldn't be published in edited (resized) form!
"Copyright (C) All rights reserved"
only links to original files are acceptable
Posted by plankgatan
move this one
the lightness is this night pics are just stunning...
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 14:25 ]
Posted by masada1971
any videos yet?? ;/
Posted by naveedaziz83
the topic of this thread is very misleading ...
it says post pics/vids by you (i assume esato members) and the pics posted here are by sum1 else without even crediting them ... not good
at least we can credit the person taking the pic and give a web link as a reference.
Posted by Raiderski
what the hell are you doing?! are you blind?
Copyright (C) All rights reserved - under every picture by Marcus!
do you have permission from him to use his pictures here in resized form?
EDIT: don't copy Marcus gallery from Flickr here, use links
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-09-26 14:44 ]
Posted by plankgatan
On 2008-09-26 15:28:38, masada1971 wrote:
any videos yet?? ;/
you have videos on youtube.
@Raederski.. take a hike...would you ! (are you some kind of internet-police).
more PICS.... (and yes, im allow to POST pics, BUT NOT to use them in any kind of commercial purpose....do you understand the difference ????)
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 15:01 ]
Posted by Raiderski
and yes, im allow to POST pics, BUT NOT
I would like to see this besides this doesn't mean that you don't have to credit every used picture!
Posted by adsada
@Plank: What do you think of these:
The focus on this is just spectacular.
[ This Message was edited by: adsada on 2008-09-26 15:14 ]
Posted by plankgatan
they are nice. but i think they are shoot with a different cam driver..or ??? (think this other have little clearer quality)
im editing the edit....(im not bother to explain myself). just watch the pics, or not.
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 15:24 ]
Posted by adsada
On 2008-09-26 16:17:05, plankgatan wrote:
they are nice. but i think they are shoot with a different cam driver..or ??? (think this other have little clearer quality)
edit..just so you internet-polices knows...i have email him...(not because i HAD to, just because i wanted to)
_________________
I
C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 15:20 ]
Damn your good. I was testing out to see if you really knew your stuff and well it's clear.
Their taken on my K850i. How can you see it's different, I could never tell.
Also the other pictures you posted are ones in Prague. Just thought you might want to know. The one with those bill boards outside with the pictures on, the pink old building behind it was recently redeveloped into a shopping mall. It's called Palladium. I presume you got the pictures off either these to websites: idnes or seznam.
Do you have any others from Czech Republic?
[ This Message was edited by: adsada on 2008-09-26 15:28 ]