Posted by axxxr
This is a photo comparison between the Nokia N90 and Sony Ericsson W800i.make up your own minds.More pictures on: mobilemania
Picture taken with the N90
Picture taken with the W800i
Posted by marran
wasn´t that much different.
maybe a bit clearer in the n90 photo..
I thouhgt n90 would be much better..
Posted by joebmc
The guy should of taken the photo from the same spot. But imo the Nokia N90 wins
_________________
T68m(i)-->T610-->k700i-->P800 + Moto RAZOR V3 (black)
my ebay items
KEEP IT spurious
[ This Message was edited by: joebmc on 2005-08-08 17:09 ]
Posted by dgilmartin
I dont know, the above photos are taken from different spots. Click the link for the website on axxxr's post, the other photos on the website comparison are far better when taken with the W800i/K750i wins. Come on Sony Ericsson!!!
[ This Message was edited by: dgilmartin on 2005-08-08 17:20 ]
Posted by WelshTom
i think axxxr is trying to play with us - the above photo is the ONLY one where the n90 does a better job. all the other photos on the page axxxr has given the link to the S.E. k750i/w800i clearly wins!!! this is very impressive and great work by sony ericsson. just further goes to prove how happy i am with my k750i!!!
Tom
Posted by Gud
Also keep in mind a 2-1 price ratio...
Posted by dgilmartin
| Quote: |
|
Yeah Axxxr, its not a very nice game you are playing, trying to convert us to Nokia, How could you!
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
Play..who me?...im a straight forward simple kind of bloke!
I just wanted to prove the fact that the N90 is isn't what it was all hyped up to be...photo difference is minimal and in fact better in some by the K750/w800..Although the video resolution is far better in the N90.
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
I think that NOIKA has clearer colors like red green and blue. But SE has more lighter pics who looks better to me. The NOIKA pics are a little bit dark i think.
Overall SE is still best I want a phone with a good camera not a Symbian phone with good cam..
Posted by Cenfi
Even N90 equipped with infamous carl zeiss, still cannot against K750I wit unfamous SE lens.
Puekhh... carl zeis is only making blokia phones become TOO DAMN EXPENSIVE!
VIVA SE!
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
| Quote: |
|
thats right
_________________
Trustes sellers
my own site
[ This Message was edited by: SIR-Sonyericsson-man on 2005-08-08 17:53 ]
Posted by Nokialoverx
That wrong :-/ Not used to challenges eh?
Posted by marran
Can be the auto focus...
does the n90 have autofocus?
Posted by Nokialoverx
You will be amazed! :-D
Posted by jeko.uk
w800i pictures are better than that crapy blokia brick
Posted by Nokialoverx
jeko.uk,you must have a eye problem.
Posted by jeko.uk
[ This Message was edited by: jeko.uk on 2005-08-08 23:18 ]
Posted by axxxr
now now calm down boys...no need to be rude.
Can we stay on the topic now please.
Thanks!
Posted by Nokialoverx
Hmmm....He called me a prick!
Posted by axxxr
jeko.uk their is no need for that kind of language here.its only fair and decent that you appologise to Nokialoverx so that we can all continue with the topic.
Cheers!
Posted by jeko.uk
i aint gonna appologise but ill edit my post but he should not have started it with that stupid remark
Posted by Nokialoverx
Its ok mate. :-D
Posted by axxxr
jeko.uk its best not to don't blame anyone but indecent language is not acceptable who evers fault it may have been.
Posted by jeko.uk
ok cool
anyway who else thinks the se pictures are better
Posted by Nokialoverx
Or the wonderful n90 with world class carl zeiss lens :-D
Posted by Cenfi
@nokialoverx: heeeeyyy wats u'r problm man?? u'r always tries to make ppl angry in most topic.
if u really likes nokia fine. just don't force other ppl to like it 2
see??? @nokialoverx start bullying again... welll ppl just ignore him!
_________________
I'm listening aac files with my k750 while typing this message with my p910 & check my w800 charge status.
simply i'm a SE fans!
VIVA SE!
[ This Message was edited by: Cenfi on 2005-08-08 18:59 ]
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
I think the
W800 is better and thats why i will be getting one.
Posted by Nokialoverx
Well Isnt it quite a while you dont see a different view?
Posted by alexlt
Well, i must admit that in the blue car picture the N90 made a litlle bit better job tha K750/W800, it has more deatails, but in the other pictures
phones made a wonderful job compared to N0kia
_________________
Paulo, Cajamarca: patrimonio historico y cultural de las Americas
[ This Message was edited by: alexlt on 2005-08-08 20:46 ]
Posted by Gigs
I tend to think the the W800i is better over all. If the car had been phtographed in the same position it would have helped.
The nokia does seem to bring out the blue a little more.
However the W800i colours don't seem yellowed. (Which may help to enhance the blue)
The W800 also seems to capture the reflections a little better imo.
Very hard to tell on scaled down pics though.
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
Posted by B.J.
it is rather disappointing considering im looking for a fone that looks as good as it performs, we guys at esato though SE lover must admit that the n90 doesn't look nywher lyk a w8, rather, a k750 which was taken to the next level, looks more PDA thingy... i dont like the n90 personally but the first image of it topping over a w8 is purely amazing.. the n doesn't have an optional flash i suppose, which the k/w has... nor can it take better pix(sorry nokialoverx, my oinion though) nd how near can the n90's macromode go.. i think it's its only way to fend off from the twin SE.. other than that, the n90 looks way better than it performs.. (sad thinking the cam levels of fone has remained within the twin SE's regime...) hope to see newer SE fones with better cams in the future..
Posted by vineet_d
Hi, for more detailed comparison please go thru this link:
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]onyericsson_w800-review-46.php
which clearly indicates that N90 looses to w800 BIG time
Posted by admad
The n90 dissapointed me. I thought that battle N90vs. k750i will be exciting and balanced. But in this compaarision the k750i is the unquestionable winner, even nokia fan can say that. Sometimes i think that 6630/6680 can take better pics than n90-.-
Posted by numb
W800/K750 is a clear winner in every single picture, its quite obvious, anyone that cannot see that either needs their glasses polished, or some education in photographing.
Nokia colors are all wrong, unnatural, oversaturated with purple fringing.
The barrel distortion are very visible on the 08.jpg nokia picture, which is a dead give away of a poor lens, carl zeis or not, this would have been ok for a cheap vga cam but its simply unforgivable for a cam like this.
W800 pictures have more details and more precise details, the nokia use some hopeless soften and sharpen filter that kills details.
Macro doesnt even work as good as on W800 even though advertised as being better.
Apart from the videorecording I cant find a single positive thing to say about the Nokia cam in comparison to the W800/K750, in fact taking all the hype about the Carl Zeis lens into consideration Id say this is downright embarising for Nokia.
Id feel cheated if I had listened to their hype and bought this monstrous brick.
Posted by mrao
@nokialoverx.....I hope you are going through this thread.....Do visit the link that vineet_d posted
Posted by vineet_d
I think adding a Carl Zeiss optics in N90 is just a marketing strategy of blokia
Posted by Nokialoverx
Hmmm....
Posted by korbindallis
It all boils down to price and the K750/W800 combo kicks N90s ass in the picture taking game
N90 beats it in only the vdo arena
no vibrator & the battary life sucks too
who wasnt to buy a phone for vdo just get the new sony 3MP DVD Cam lol
now comment on this one nokia lovers !
Posted by dancingfate
Yes, the comparison did by gsmarena is clearly mentioned that W800/K750 is superior than Nokia N90.
That's why I love SE, and it makes me going to buy W800 (only waiting for the price to drop a little...)
Posted by Cenfi
yeah.. i'd love this thread... many ppl revealed blokia evil marketing plan. they only want 2 drains $$$ from u'r pocket using carl zeiss brand.
Posted by Amras
| Quote: |
The n90 dissapointed me. I thought that battle N90vs. k750i will be exciting and balanced. But in this compaarision the k750i is the unquestionable winner, even nokia fan can say that. Sometimes i think that 6630/6680 can take better pics than n90-. |
that's also what i think. ;D
and sometimes i think that S700i can take better pics than N90 in certain fields.
Posted by Kryptik
I have to agree with you, in that i've seen the most awesome pix taken with a SE. Same pix taken with my Nokia couldn't compare... It's 1 reason why i'm considering a change to SE
Posted by axxxr
This whole hoo ha about Carl Zeiss did'nt work out too well for the N90.
Posted by chtan
Here is another photo comparison that state otherwise. Eventhough the barrel problem still exist in N90 but overall the picture is cleaner and more vibrant in color.
http://it.enorth.com.cn/system/2005/05/27/001033021.shtml
Posted by gelfen
the colour is more vibrant because the n90 sacrifices accurate colour rendition by artificially saturating the blue-green end of the spectrum. this makes the image look brighter but less realistic. fuji film used to do that all the time compared with kodak because it appealed more to asian markets.
Posted by B.J.
and hu doesn't know the 6270. 6280 etc... they all have 2mpix cam... another strategy for nokia to block up they overrated n series... wonder wat happened to that n91? ny feed backs guys? hu owns one?
Posted by Enricos
Hy guys,
Look at the link and make your conclusion,more pictures are comming,Centrino am i on a Belgium forum,the pictures are taken on a dark room,whit flasch and macro.
http://www.vergelijking.be/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4707
[ This Message was edited by: Enricos on 2005-10-07 12:53 ]
Posted by o44wen
check this site out for picture comparison.
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]onyericsson_w800-review-46.php
Sony Ericsson pictures are so much better