| Author |
esato member not being honest - should I name them ? |
dvdgremlin
Joined: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 158
From: England
PM |
I have told the other person via PM that I will identify them on the 12th August, 2004 if I dont get a reasonable explanation.
Please dont flame them,.... I just dont want someone else to lose out on a deal. |
|
|
Vlammetje
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Den Haag
PM, WWW
|
dude, has it occurred to you yet that this thread could have been started the exact same way by the other guy?
And also has it occurred to you that because you both made a lousy agreement and both decided not to follow up, hardly means anything to anybody?
And that 'pressuring' somebody into an explanation that you already have decided to not accept, and sort of blackmailing said explanation out of them with an 'or else I'll throw your name to the masses and discredit you forever' really tells us a lot about YOUR character doesn't it? 
And 'don't flame' after you yourself started this thread? Please. You want him to get falmed so bad he'll disappear. Else this thread would not exist and the two of you would have resolved the situation in calmness and good spirits.
|
gelfen
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM |
i am thoroughly disappointed in the clarity of thought and logical deduction displayed in that post vlam. it is entirely out of keeping with the spirit of this thread. shame on you. 
|
boto43
Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Trnava-Nitra,Pardubice CSSR
PM |
Sorry,but I have a note or question.Must be every esato member honest?Certainly ,I am.Guys,I am very sory to interrupt you but I would never buy anything through the "channels" of Esato. I don't wanna offend to anyone.
ja cejtim se bejt esatem sk podvedenej  |
methylated_spirit
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM |
BLAST them. If anyone did it to me i would definately warn all the other (decent, well behaved, nice) esato members about this wholly intolerable bumhead.
Hello, Scroto!
U.G.L.Y. You ain't got no alibi, you ugly! |
dvdgremlin
Joined: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 158
From: England
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-08-11 07:26:18, Vlammetje wrote:
dude, has it occurred to you yet that this thread could have been started the exact same way by the other guy?
|
|
not true as I never claimed to have posted anything.
Quote:
|
And also has it occurred to you that because you both made a lousy agreement and both decided not to follow up, hardly means anything to anybody?
|
|
If that were true why have you posted on here ?
Quote:
|
And that 'pressuring' somebody into an explanation that you already have decided to not accept, and sort of blackmailing said explanation out of them with an 'or else I'll throw your name to the masses and discredit you forever' really tells us a lot about YOUR character doesn't it?
|
|
It could be interpreted that way but I actually have two reasons which are
1. Not to discredit somebody if there is a genuine misunderstanding.
2. To warn others that they may lose if they attempt to trade with him.
Quote:
|
And 'don't flame' after you yourself started this thread? Please. You want him to get falmed so bad he'll disappear. Else this thread would not exist and the two of you would have resolved the situation in calmness and good spirits.
|
|
Its rather hard to discuss something and resolve it in good spirits with a person that has decided to disappear. Its a genuine request not to flame the guy but its clearly up to others what they choose to do.
its interesting that my position seems to have polarised viewpoints into me being either a really bad guy or simply someone who attempted to deal with someone else on esato. If I had been stupid and just sent my case he would not have been caught out as he would have said his was lost in the post.
|
Merovingian
Joined: Aug 29, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
for crists sake, just name the guy, or lock this topic now...this is getting annoying
|
dci
Joined: Apr 13, 2003
Posts: 43
PM |
I think you'd better get this person's name on here fast, so we can direct some serious abuse their way, and no longer have to use you as a gratuitous scapegoat for some light entertainment of an afternoon.
|
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
there will be "NO SERIOUS ABUSE" going to other members lest you want to get yourself banned, thanks 
The only outcome from this may be that you choose not to deal with one (or both) of these persons
|
Krubach
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM |
Yep. No business with both.
Neither send the stuff as agreed...
@masseur.
Just lock this. this is getting nowhere...
[addsig] |
Merovingian
Joined: Aug 29, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
@masseur: yes please, lock this, or it's going to get into a flame war
|
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
@dvdgremlin
If you do genuinely want to resolve this matter then why the procrastination? Why announce that you will name this chap on a certain date as if it is some sort of major event? At the risk of sounding rude I really do think that you should either name the chap if you feel that strongly about it and let him defend himself if he chooses to or don't name him.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
methylated_spirit
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM |
It doesnt matter if you flame them anyway they can just log in under a different name.
Hello, Scroto!
U.G.L.Y. You ain't got no alibi, you ugly! |
Merovingian
Joined: Aug 29, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
@methylated: if it was so simple, banned people could just log in.. But I think that it's your IP-adress that gets blocked.. correct me if I'm wrong..
|
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
I believe that certain members have managed to get round that, wink wink, nudge nudge. 
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
|
|
Posted: 2004-08-11 04:03
