Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Technical > Bluetooth vs Ir

Author Bluetooth vs Ir
swazi
P900 no flip
Joined: Oct 07, 2002
Posts: 499
From: Swazi in Bahrain
PM
Posted: 2004-05-06 22:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
hi, trying to find a quicker way of getting my mp3's to my phone than ifra red , any ideas, is bluetooth faster
Email ecollyer@consultant.com
8810 + 7650 + SE T630*HBh-65, i know waiting for P900 to come down in price
imanuk
P990 no flip
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
Posts: 241
From: Stafford, UK
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-05-06 22:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
If you want to for a p900 best job is a USB MSDUO card reader very quick and makes your MSDUO into a drive on your PC, (usually you buy a USB MS card reader and use the supplied adaptor from your MSDUO)

Otherwise BT isn't really much faster as it still uses the serial interface.
swazi
P900 no flip
Joined: Oct 07, 2002
Posts: 499
From: Swazi in Bahrain
PM
Posted: 2004-05-06 22:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
sorry but it is for a nokia 6230
Email ecollyer@consultant.com
8810 + 7650 + SE T630*HBh-65, i know waiting for P900 to come down in price
Jowi
Xperia X10 Mini Black
Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Pilipinas
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
gforce23
P800 no flip
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Atlanta, London, Dubai
PM
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Use a mmc card reader.

This message was posted from a T310

mario2002
J200
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jeffrey's-Bay ,South Africa
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
No ,bluetooth is actually slower then Ir ! If you want speed use a USB card reader. Is about 10X faster.Bluetooth is very convenient. Ir is pretty much outdated.

This message was posted from a Nokia 7650

gelfen
Z600
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
BT is quicker than IR
Whomsoever you see in distress, recognize in him a fellow man

Gelfen's special place where nobody talks to him anymore
gforce23
P800 no flip
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Atlanta, London, Dubai
PM
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Only in the domain of cellphones. In real world, IR is faster.

This message was posted from a WAP device

gelfen
Z600
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
actually, they are the same speed since they are both forms of electromagnetic radiation - and therefore both travel at the speed of light. however, as a means of data transfer bt is faster.
Whomsoever you see in distress, recognize in him a fellow man

Gelfen's special place where nobody talks to him anymore
gforce23
P800 no flip
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Atlanta, London, Dubai
PM
Posted: 2004-05-07 07:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I will agree with u on this point.

This message was posted from a WAP device

mario2002
J200
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jeffrey's-Bay ,South Africa
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-05-07 08:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Gelfen - do a google search on Ir and Bt specs ! I am using both for almost 2y now. I love Bt. But Ir is faster .(ir max 2400kb/s bt max 720kb/s) last time i tested the transfer speed bt averieged 700kb/s Ir just over 1mb/s ! And this speeds where measured under 'best connection' condition. Both will have 10X less transfer speeds under 'minimum/worst connection' condition !

This message was posted from a Nokia 7650

gelfen
Z600
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM
Posted: 2004-05-07 09:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i did, and look what i found:

from http://www.cyberwalker.net/features/bluetooth-fall-00.html

"...(Bluetooth) uses a globally available, unlicensed radio band that supports data speeds of up to 720 kilobits per second (kbps)."

from http://www.clarinetsys.com/si[....]nce/Improve-IR-Performance.pdf

The Infrared Data Association (IrDA) has developed four transfer rate (“speed”) standards for shortrangeinfrared data transmission:

SIR* (Serial Infrared): 115.2Kbps, which is broadly adopted in mobile phones and many portable devices.

MIR (Medium Infrared): 1.152Mbps, which is rarely adopted.

FIR (Fast Infrared): 4Mbps, which is adopted in laptops and digital cameras and some Pocket PC PDAs.

VFIR (Very Fast Infrared): 16Mbps, which is supported by Windows XP.


so BT is quicker in mobile phones.


_________________
Gee, does that beat me? I only got two pair - two aces, and another two.

Check this out - it's a cracker!

[ This Message was edited by: gelfen on 2004-05-07 08:05 ]
swazi
P900 no flip
Joined: Oct 07, 2002
Posts: 499
From: Swazi in Bahrain
PM
Posted: 2004-05-08 00:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Ok thank you guys . But the problem is it takes me about 10 minutes to send a song to my phone. Should it be taking this long using ir . If so can anyone recommend a good mmc card reader, and what price it goes for
imanuk
P990 no flip
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
Posts: 241
From: Stafford, UK
PM, WWW
Posted: 2004-05-08 01:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Actually I just have on this thread:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=58115

Plus it would have been useful to spec orriginally in this thread that you were wanting advide for your nokia - ESP as this is a forum!
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi