| Author |
Sony Xperia rumours 2022 |
Laal_Cd
Joined: Mar 20, 2019
Posts: 13
PM |
And here comes benchmark score of 16GB version.
https://imgur.com/a/5lYjWBR
I never got this high score with mine. Wondering if it's because of 16GB RAM or xperia stream |
|
|
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
Geekbench does not discriminate ram amount like antutu. Probably is using the fan.
4g1 is dual A78 + quad A55 like 695.
6g1 is quad A78 + quad A55 like 778.
Coincidence or scam? |
amardeep
Joined: Apr 21, 2007
Posts: 62
PM |
The latest episode of the long running Xperia Compact rumour series, "New Sony Xperia compact smartphone based on the Xperia Ace IV could be heading for a global launch" (notebookcheck.net).
[ This Message was edited by: amardeep on 2022-09-13 08:07 ] |
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
Is it true sony planning on going back to Canada? |
cool_sauce
Joined: Feb 20, 2020
Posts: 324
PM |
On 2022-09-13 15:08:28, Hawk12 wrote:
Is it true sony planning on going back to Canada?
I always found it weird they are present in US but not in Canada. |
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
Since it is not for sale here, I do not have choice.
Gonna buy Motorola G200 during Black Friday.
Just need to wait another good price, stupid Motorola increased its price 20% today. 😒 |
spektykles
Joined: Dec 18, 2017
Posts: 343
PM |
On 2022-09-12 17:04:43, Laal_Cd wrote:
And here comes benchmark score of 16GB version.
https://imgur.com/a/5lYjWBR
I never got this high score with mine. Wondering if it's because of 16GB RAM or xperia stream
Its the fan, not the RAM. I tried it without the fan and its the same as common variants. Large RAM only benefits heavy games (like emulations) and multitask. But there are benefits of having larger storage: slightly faster read/write speed and less performance degradation when used for some long time. Flash memory degrades a little bit everyday, I have seen old Xperias became too slow because of degraded flash chip (slow read/write speed), not by battery degradation or overheats.
On 2022-09-09 14:37:50, Hawk12 wrote:
If people in charge of development are in Japan, how can ppl in China know so much about it to speak on weibo?
They either learned from the component suppliers or talking out of their ass 
[ This Message was edited by: spektykles on 2022-09-14 16:34 ] |
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
Gossips from China say Apple may have made huge mistake with new camera. That it would not be any better than 13 pro . I feel so satisfied to read this.
We do not want the periscope with 455. The one with 557 is way better despite being slower and more expensive. Thank you !!
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2022-09-15 01:38 ] |
cool_sauce
Joined: Feb 20, 2020
Posts: 324
PM |
On 2022-09-14 23:34:28, Hawk12 wrote:
Gossips from China say Apple may have made huge mistake with new camera. That it would not be any better than 13 pro . I feel so satisfied to read this.
We do not want the periscope with 455. The one with 557 is way better despite being slower and more expensive. Thank you !!
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2022-09-15 01:38 ]
That ship has sailed, iPhone is going all in with qb 48mp. iPhone will introduce 48mp on UW next generation most likely and so on. They simply want to fight with Samsungs and Xiamis in imaging and video and in order to do that they need qb sensors. Sony on the other hand couldn't care less but it is what it is and next xperias will carry qb as well. Maybe not the next Pro but the next 1 for sure.
Apple did tone down saturation with the 14 so that's a good premise. We are finally getting there where we will no longer see HDR puke of images, oversharpened images and toxic contrast. Slowly we are getting there. |
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
Gossips from China say next "pro-i" and mark 5 still use bayer for 24mm. The 16mm of mark 5 would be 48MP 1/2.4", both using a quadbayer version of 557 for the 70-200mm. The whole combo 1" + 1/1.3" + 1/1.67" for next "pro-i" seems too good to be true. 1/1.3" for 16mm would be too much waste of space, no need for more than 1/1.9".
I have noticed pro max 14 behaves less like 13 pro max and closer to what xperia would do in some situations. Some photos had brihter foreground, but also brighter background. No underexposed subject in favor of sky. People looks like texture is lower quality than expected and raw of 48MP mode seems 💩.
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2022-09-15 13:27 ] |
Shino03
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2022-09-14 23:34:28, Hawk12 wrote:
Gossips from China say Apple may have made huge mistake with new camera. That it would not be any better than 13 pro . I feel so satisfied to read this.
We do not want the periscope with 455. The one with 557 is way better despite being slower and more expensive. Thank you !!
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2022-09-15 01:38 ]
Possibly true, my old macbook air's camera, 2015 has a better camera than my new air, 2022 model.
For the sake of design, Apple is decreasing some quality on their devices. |
cool_sauce
Joined: Feb 20, 2020
Posts: 324
PM |
On 2022-09-15 14:25:24, Hawk12 wrote:
Gossips from China say next "pro-i" and mark 5 still use bayer for 24mm. The 16mm of mark 5 would be 48MP 1/2.4", both using a quadbayer version of 557 for the 70-200mm. The whole combo 1" + 1/1.3" + 1/1.67" for next "pro-i" seems too good to be true. 1/1.3" for 16mm would be too much waste of space, no need for more than 1/1.9".
I have noticed pro max 14 behaves less like 13 pro max and closer to what xperia would do in some situations. Some photos had brihter foreground, but also brighter background. No underexposed subject in favor of sky. People looks like texture is lower quality than expected and raw of 48MP mode seems 💩.
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2022-09-15 13:27 ]
Yeah next 1 IV enhanced edition aka PRO will just switch the main sensor compared to 5 IV, I guess that's pretty much like done deal. Unless they really want to surprise us and keep variable zoom from 1 IV but I doubt it.
Anyway I can totally buy mark V ultrawide and telephoto to have qb instead of the main sensor. But somehow I still belive main sensor will be iPhone 14 sensor but it's up to Sony if they will keep the pixel field at 48mp qb or usual 12mp. We shall wait but what's for sure is that 1 IV has perfected the current setup and next generation needs to go to the new stuff.
Honestly I think PRO-I was the first Xperia that deserved the money they've been asking and then came along 1 IV which is worth every penny (unfortunatelly that's what 1 III should have been) and now 5 IV seems like a even better deal than 1 IV. Next 1 IV PRO will probably be brutal refresh of previous PRO-I. Can't wait. For sure I won't be changing my PRO-I anytime soon but I'm excited to see what's next. I guess my next phone will be 5 V as I am so tempted right now to get 5 IV as well. But that's just the excitment feeling I got, it will go away. |
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
So, after years humiliating xperia .... Karma is a b*****
https://www.theverge.com/2022[....]otographic-styles-hdr-contrast |
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Haha Sony gave options of off, DRO or HDR. More than enough and their HDR was not overly done. Always love their natural shots! And if really want over saturated fantasy island? Edit it ~ 🤣 |
Hawk12
Joined: Nov 29, 2018
Posts: > 500
PM |
Pdx-221 and pdx-222. If there is one for november, what's the other?
I would be satisfied if next pro-i keeps same design. Also, just give it 50MP with 5ms readout with 30Fps 120 AE/AF like A1.
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2022-09-21 03:50 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2022-09-12 17:04
