| Author |
short comparision c902 & c905 |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
lets not make fun of each other languages and call each other liars and stick to the topic plz ..
plank, you have to remember that you created this thread to compare pics .. so you have to tolerate some criticism about c902 ... not everyone thinks the same you know ...
Nokia N8 |
|
|
Bialynia
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Posts: 337
PM |
On 2008-11-12 23:16:21, plankgatan wrote:
well, maybe you can teach me some real, good English......(then maybe i can you teach you some Swedish...get my point ???)
who cares if i do some misstakes, English is not my head language... second, i think most people understand what im saying......jäkla bondläpp.
I sincerely apologize if you felt I was making fun of your English, I was not. I was laughing at the preamble of "no offense" that you used, lots of people say that right before they offend someone, I always found that funny.  |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
^^ i think plank was referring to nightblade and i know wht ur talking abt .. hehe ... it is strange
Nokia N8 |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
You can't blame me for finding it irritating.
|
Bialynia
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Posts: 337
PM |
Oh, yeah I missed that, thanks.
That aside, I'm not sure the c905 more saturated color balance is necessarily better then that of the c902. I can tell you that when I took the shots I though the c902 would be more yellow because its screen is darker, so it was a surprise when I saw them on my computer. |
al3in
Joined: Nov 15, 2008
Posts: 2
PM |
no big defference between the two ??? |
walgman
Joined: Nov 02, 2008
Posts: 54
PM |
Love the way these forums turn into slanging matches.
|
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
http://blog.se-nse.net/2008/1[....]d80-night-shoot-out/#more-3708
c902 is awful
OnePlus 8 |
Pitzon
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Sweden
PM |
I think the c902 pics in bright conditions looks just as good or even better in many situations compared to the c905:s. In my eyes and compared to all samples i have seen so far in this forum the c905 having big problems with taking sharp pictures.
The c902 are amazing in good light and macro as i have stated plenty of times before but ofcourse it sucks when it comes to flash-pics and compared with the c905 strong flash.
But flash pics with c905 looks no good either (yet) in my opinion and people get strange skin-tones and so on. I think there´s much improvement needed before i will run and buy a c905. My N82 took much better flash-pics at our latest party compared to a friends c905.
I sold my N82 yesterday and after spending some time looking at all crisp and sharp pictures from my earlier c902:s i decided to go for one yet again. The c905 have not amazed me yet but i think there will be improvements later on with firmware upgrades but when? The c902 have reached it´s potential i think but it gets you quite far ( in good light )
Ofcourse i went for the titanium edition
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
C902 had no chances in this comparision but I think this phone can do a lot better results in low-light than we know. even old K800 can give great results in 2s exposure time. imagine this in C902 - enabled LED during all 2s exposure and more sensitive sensor (K800 need ISO640 while C902 only ISO250 to get the same result). sounds good for me
... any C902 user who want to experiment?
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-11-20 22:08 ] |
nicke.picke
Joined: Oct 29, 2008
Posts: 29
PM |
On 2008-11-20 22:19:58, Pitzon wrote:
I think the c902 pics in bright conditions looks just as good or even better in many situations compared to the c905:s. In my eyes and compared to all samples i have seen so far in this forum the c905 having big problems with taking sharp pictures.
The c902 are amazing in good light and macro as i have stated plenty of times before but ofcourse it sucks when it comes to flash-pics and compared with the c905 strong flash.
But flash pics with c905 looks no good either (yet) in my opinion and people get strange skin-tones and so on. I think there´s much improvement needed before i will run and buy a c905. My N82 took much better flash-pics at our latest party compared to a friends c905.
I sold my N82 yesterday and after spending some time looking at all crisp and sharp pictures from my earlier c902:s i decided to go for one yet again. The c905 have not amazed me yet but i think there will be improvements later on with firmware upgrades but when? The c902 have reached it´s potential i think but it gets you quite far ( in good light )
Ofcourse i went for the titanium edition
I agree.
I feel c902 take better pictures in all envoirements except for flash.another thing is that c902 camera is more speedy, thats very good.
tnx Nicke
_________________
Veni, Vidi, Vici
[ This Message was edited by: nicke.picke on 2008-11-23 12:14 ] |
majorblade
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 12
PM |
hello, what is the photo flash operating range of c902? thanks |
sowbran
Joined: Jun 11, 2006
Posts: 158
From: Mexico
PM |
woo im gonna sell my c905 and buy the c902 always is the best.
any camera can win to the c902?? thanks.. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-12 23:26
