| Author |
short comparision c902 & c905 |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The 1's on Flickr are edited.
|
|
|
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
That's what I thought. If you sharpen the pics in Photoshop, it won't show in the Exif information. Plus a lot of the people posting the pics like Fontaine work for  , so a little bit of editing to make their product look good wouldn't hurt would it?
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
why do you think it's edited?
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
No exif, it looks lightly edited maybe just sharpned and resized.
|
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
those pics are NOT Edited
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
But how do you know? Why are they so different from the photos taken by every other C905?
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
no EXIF? not true...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcusradecker/2997098548/meta/
|
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
the pics tht are edited do not show the firmware version in the software section (atleast thts what i have noticed) and the example presented by plank , link by Raider show the firmware .. so not edited 
Nokia N8 |
adnansanni
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM |
On 2008-11-12 04:55:33, Bialynia wrote:
Lights on in the home, settings on auto, c902 v c905, no flash.
macro
c902
macro
c905
Anybody notice reddish on C905? |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
... or to high yellow on C902 pic. it's better to ask Bialynia what colors are closer to real
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-11-12 15:43:10, Raiderski wrote:
why do you think it's edited?
exactley, why should they be editied ???? (i dont see any stuff like that inside the EXIF info or something else)
marcus himself say this;
best phone ever..seems its one more SE fan here...he he he
_________________
I C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 16:52 ] |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
It's just a possibility, but you have to really get a detailed EXIF report to see if it's been used in Photoshop. I've sharpened pictures taken with my K810i taken on holiday and such like, and there is no trace at all in EXIF of that happening.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
if you use some kind of 3.part software EXIF change right away...BUT if you use photo dj, you can just see it with a other type of program.....(maybe some other "code" inside EXIF data changes when using photo dj as well...im not sure)
i dont think they are edit...... i think he might have a beta c905 (something)
Raederski, i think c902 sometimes gives a slightly yellow touch when its little lower light, if you increase the light a bit you get more natural nuance on the indoor pictures..........
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 17:30 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
true. auto WB in less light need more time to stabilize colors. different color cast on both pics are not that much important
|
Bialynia
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Posts: 337
PM |
Some daylight pics for your viewing pleasure, all auto, white balance set on cloudy, no flash.
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
macro
c902
macro
c905
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-12 14:52
