| Author |
short comparision c902 & c905 |
Bialynia
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Posts: 337
PM |
Lights on in the home, settings on auto, c902 v c905, no flash.
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
macro
c902
macro
c905
Looking at the pictures in reduced size the c902 holds up surprisingly well, but when we get a bit bigger you can see all the noise in the c902:
As opposed to the c905:
[ This Message was edited by: Bialynia on 2008-11-12 03:56 ] |
|
|
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
judging by the pics abve , c905 wins in indoor low light .... lets hope sum1 doesnt spam this thread with lots of c902 pics hehe
Nokia N8 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
wich firmware do you use on your c902.....i doubt its 002.
latest firmware on c902 is not so good, ive tried it (2 times) and went back to 002 both times........thats all.
edit.... i think c902 berry & box-pictures looks better then c905, (it have a bit higher color-saturation and little better contrast).....well, thats my opinion.
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 11:51 ] |
Radu_91
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 201
From: Romania
PM |
but the purpose of a camera is to make picture as real as posible |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
so ????
are you suggestion that the berry picture with c905 looks more "alive" then c902 ??? ( i dont think that berry picture is so pale in the reality)
besides, i think c902 handle true colors very good if you look at some outdoor pictures...(it just k800 & k750 who is similar in colors there...well and c905 with proper firmware of course)..and thats my oppinion again 
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 11:59 ] |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@plankgatan-post full size comparisons or reduce c905 to 5 mp and compare. |
Radu_91
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 201
From: Romania
PM |
anyway apart from the berry shot which is hard to decide the C905 wins
|
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
On 2008-11-12 04:55:33, Bialynia wrote:
Lights on in the home, settings on auto, c902 v c905, no flash.
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
macro
c902
macro
c905
Looking at the pictures in reduced size the c902 holds up surprisingly well, but when we get a bit bigger you can see all the noise in the c902:
As opposed to the c905:
[ This Message was edited by: Bialynia on 2008-11-12 03:56 ]
thank you very much for such unbaised comprasion. c905 wins easily
its a much better camera then c902, nice replacement for k750 finnaly
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-11-12 12:19 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-11-12 12:19 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
yeh yeh. this c905 pictures knock everything back to stoneage.....they looks much better then this taken by c902
se.dude...
^^
hhmm. it dosent mather one bit my friend...as long c905 uses this firmware it WILL NOT look much better just because you go down to 5m.p.
and that i insure you....
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 12:20 ] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
plank you again live in firmware conspiracies, only thing that can change picture quality is camera driver... not firmware alone
OnePlus 8 |
Radu_91
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Posts: 201
From: Romania
PM |
on the firmware i agree with you plankgatan , the C905 need a major upgrade |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
Vipera...well, i didnt thought i had to explained everything in details..i know its the cam driver...but i choose to say firmware...is that ok for everyone ???
besides......think its very funny, you say this looks better when they actaully looks a bit worse.....he he he.
i think this tells quite much..same settings..but different results..
(c905 need a new, better FIRMWARE  , (which also (hopefully) results in a new camdriver...sometimes they keep same cam driver like most people know)
better ???
ps..you self just posted same (all 10 pictures) again...remember ??? he he
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 12:38 ] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
you posted 3rd time same pictures in this thread
OnePlus 8 |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Dark magician has an awesome cam driver(modded) i guess.Will check it out once i get my phone. 
[ This Message was edited by: se_dude on 2008-11-12 12:44 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
edit..................
can someone maybe explain one thing...this last picture i saw on Flickr.som, looks absolutley great, and they is taken by latest R1BA034.....how is that possible ??
myself tried that firmware yesterday with c905 (the phone pictures and everything), and it was not this good...i dont get it....
anyway..here is R1BA034...looks quite different against this other pictures
edit.
wondering if its possible he have some Beta c905 with a different cam-module...(he have use his c905 quite long time now, must been early released by SE)
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 13:26 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-12 04:55
