| Author |
short comparision c902 & c905 |
ginek0log
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Posts: 19
PM |
sry, but from your previous post you are the least credible person to comapre anyting to C902. |
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
please, you make me cry here...(ok guys i admit, i have super edit all c902 pics and make all c905 pics worse.....you got me there).
lets turn everything to the opposite way...what do you see when you look at c905 thread ???? its obivious c905 suffers of unstable software...
get real and swallow the fact....
both this pictures is shoot with macro (exactley same settings)...its obivious thats something who make c905 unsharp...
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-11 19:45 ] |
dephanix
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 188
From: UK
PM |
The firmware on the C905 you used is old. There is a newer firmware out now. |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
Planks c902 is always better... Plank compare his c902 with dslr, and c902 is better.
|
Bialynia
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Posts: 337
PM |
On 2008-11-11 22:13:32, dephanix wrote:
The firmware on the C905 you used is old. There is a newer firmware out now.
Plank believes the old firmware is better (which it may be, I don't know), I have the latest firmware on my c902 so if the pics suck I know it will be because I was using the wrong firmware  |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
On 2008-11-11 20:25:32, plankgatan wrote:
its obivious c905 suffers of unstable software...
get real and swallow the fact....
Unstable? What's unstable about this phone? It's the most rock steady A200 phone yet.
It's problem is simply to much noise reduction applied because of the tiny sensor being used. If that was tuned down a bit, it would be fine. That hardly classes as unstable does it?
If I use photoshop on my pics and sharpen them, you can see the potential is there.
And this whole thing about comparing with the sharpness of the C902 is getting silly. The C902 sharpens far too much, and leaves loads of noise. It is by no means the benchmark others should be compared to. As it stands now, I'd much prefer slightly softer pics and the almost zero noise I get from the C905.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-11-11 23:02:19, milan91 wrote:
Planks c902 is always better... Plank compare his c902 with dslr, and c902 is better.
you right...tomorow i declare that my c902 produce MUCH better pics then my girlfriend 80mm Hasselblad 503....hhmm
ps...i havnt said one thing that c905 is crap. i know its pontential...lets hope everything goes well............
--------------------------------------------------------------------
edit...feels kind of silly to speak about cameras (regarding cellphones)...cellphones have "no" camera, its just some cheap lens with some cheap, tiny sensor...this is a camera...over & out;
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-11 23:38 ] |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
Thanks Plankgatan for your efforts; ignore the cynicism from the self appointed experts.
I don't mind the slightly lesser sharpness in the C905 photos, I'm happy trade that for a reduction of the noise which I'm surprised is still present in the C902 pics.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
slightly less sharpness ???? well, thats even more silly then my own post....
its not just bad sharpness. if you look at many pics they quite often suffers of bleached colors (bad white balance), etc....
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-11 23:47 ] |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
was c902 pics sharp whn it first came out or did the sharpness increased with firmware releases?
Nokia N8 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i think it just was the first firmware who had quite weak quality...then R3BH002 came and everything got f####ng great (with other words  )
remember Pitzons first R3BH002 pics by his c902 ?? http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=171299&start=75
i remember i didnt believe it was "real" colors...but they was true.....
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 00:11 ] |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
On 2008-11-12 00:53:43, plankgatan wrote:
i think it was just the first firmware who had quite bad quality...
u said it urself ... so hopefully a firmware update will bring sharpness to the pics  we just have to wait and c
Nokia N8 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
here you have your "original" sharpness 4 months ago....and this are indoor.....great stuff by Pitzon c902
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 00:12 ] |
brunoXT
Joined: Jul 14, 2005
Posts: 115
From: Lima, Peru
PM |
[quote]
On 2008-11-11 14:51:33, plankgatan wrote:
tried c905 today in the store (unbranded R1BA034), it was one thing who feelt a bit odd and thats was the D-Pad, (the frame around the d-pad) it was not very pleasent to use i think, otherwise (except for it Big size) it was good..........
all pictures is shoot same time.
c905
I wish we had that store here in California.  |
yea g
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
haha wish we had those here in NZ too. Just looking in a vodafone store today, they have 1g m2 for 160NZD, sony style has the exact same card for 60NZD 
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-11 20:08
