Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > C702 vs. C902 vs. G900

Previous  12
Author C702 vs. C902 vs. G900
Muhammad-Oli
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM
Posted: 2008-10-31 05:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-10-30 05:57:20, adnansanni wrote:
Hard core texting in C902 isn't best idea due to uncommon keypad style.


I don't have a problem with it. They keypad is perfectly normal. What do you mean?
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member.
adnansanni
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM
Posted: 2008-10-31 17:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Mine are too hard to press and it’s not give us good felling when we press a button like some others normally do. We have used to with it now. But heavy texting like over 25 SMS per day with it; I won’t recommend then.
cadcad
Satio Silver
Joined: Mar 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lebanon
PM
Posted: 2008-10-31 17:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
go for the G900. Its the best phone ive ever had.

This message was posted from a G900
adnansanni
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM
Posted: 2008-10-31 19:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
G900+dying UIQ=nothings special (IMO).
I used P990i, W950i but didn’t find anything desired with that UIQ.

At least you can get a good camera quality on C902.
gforce23
P800 no flip
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Atlanta, London, Dubai
PM
Posted: 2008-10-31 19:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The C702 looks a bit too ordinary. It's a pretty close fight between the C902 and G900.

The lack of WiFi and small-ish screen on the C902 are deal breakers for me. Of course, the death of UIQ might sway some folks away from what is a good effort from but look at it this way - apps developed for phones based on next year's SF OS might be incompatible with the current gen of S60 FP2 devices, yet people are scooping up N85s, N79s and N96s in droves.

If I were you, I'd get the G900 since I think there are more apps for UIQ than A200 phones (built for 240x320 screens). Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Satio, X1, P1i, HTC Hero, Blokia N900, N97 mini, N95-2, Crackberry Curve 8900 (corporate)
Muhammad-Oli
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM
Posted: 2008-11-01 01:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-10-31 17:29:12, adnansanni wrote:
Mine are too hard to press and it’s not give us good felling when we press a button like some others normally do. We have used to with it now. But heavy texting like over 25 SMS per day with it; I won’t recommend then.


I find nothing wrong with it and I write up to 100 text messages per day.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member.
Coquito
W810 black
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-11-01 02:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I would go for G900: bigger touch screen, Wifi, more aplications, 5MPX, classic design and more..

C902 and G900 are almost the same price!! (Ebay)



[ This Message was edited by: Coquito on 2008-11-01 01:26 ]
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-11-01 02:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-10-31 05:20:07, csarspjo wrote:
G900 de hecho 5 mpx, wi-fi, gps, autorotate.... wowwwww SYMBIAN

salu2


It's not Symbian mate, but I guess you just weren't speaking English.
silmer
T68 gold
Joined: Jul 28, 2003
Posts: 70
PM
Posted: 2008-11-01 12:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
If you are a texter, like me, dont get the G. I juat changed from K800 to G700. No profiles. No animations. Such a long process to put in a simple symbol. Cant display graphics. But the touch screen and writing recognition are great
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi