Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > C702 vs. C902 vs. G900

12  Next
Author C702 vs. C902 vs. G900
Belaga91
Model not set
Joined: Oct 27, 2008
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'm trying to decided which one I should get and I cannot seem to come to a conclusion. I like the durability of the C702. I like the 5 mp and feel of the C902. The G900 just seems relatively similar, so I have to throw it into the mix. It'd be great if any of you guys could give me your personal opinion or a testimonial on any or all phones. Thanks.

What's your vote?
adnansanni
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
My vote goes to C902.
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
same here...but G900 isn't bat either
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice
xironghostx
W350 White
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2008-10-27 23:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The Picturequality from the g900 is nowhere close the c902 imo.
ocean21
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 30, 2007
Posts: 217
From: Singapore
PM
Posted: 2008-10-28 05:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Get the C902, better build quality. Moreover, I don't think you should get the G900. Symbian UIQ is dying soon. I said soon, not now.
iPhone 3GS
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-10-28 17:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Although I own a C702 but I'll have to say that it's not that durable, C902's slim full metal armor is better in more ways than one. But it still manages to capture my fanboyism, just like those rookie football players!

On a serious note, the C702's A200 is a lot simpler than G900 but if you really like a small smartphone then it's G900.
QVGA
Nokia Lumia 1020
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-10-28 18:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I wouldnt go near a UIQ phone with a 20ft pole.
Leyland
HTC One X
Joined: Sep 24, 2008
Posts: 15
From: London, UK
PM
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I had a chance to own C702 for a short time, about a week, I did like that phone is dust and splash resistant but quaility built was not that good, they used cheap plastic, very annoying thing are buttons on keypad, not comfortable enough to text ( if you are in to texting ) I do own C902 which is a bit different than C702 in quality built as well as design and look, ( OK C702 is 3.2 megapixel camera and C902 is 5 megapixel ) have some metal parts and it feels bit more compact, annoying thing about C902 is screen which is kind a small, should be bit bigger ( C702 got bit bigger screen ) also I am annoyed about battery life, goes very quickly if you do use it for texting and talking, still haven't figure it out when you listen music or watching videos but I can bet it will go quickly for sure. G900 I heard lot of good things about it but never had chance to see it in real life. My vote goes for C902. Good luck in chosing your new phone.
Muhammad-Oli
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Of those phones, the C902 has the best picture quality and best build quality (and in my opinion it is an amazing looker).

The C702 has GPS and a slightly bigger screen than the C902. Apparently the build quality isn't too flash though. The looks are questionable, but they do grow on you.

The G900 seems to have the worst picture quality (SE tends to put more effort into making the Cyber-shot branded ones the best in their range), but it has the advantage of having the biggest screen and being a smartphone, if that appeals to you. The styling of the G900 seems pretty bland to me though.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member.
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The G900's main advantages are being a smartphone and a very small one at that. Touch focus and doesn't improve photo quality that much. C902 is a lot better in the camera department, although there are some parts that gather dust too easily.
TeknoBoi90
Xperia Mini Pro Black
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: 164
From: Piemonte, Italy
PM
Posted: 2008-10-29 16:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
For the G900, what could be the main advantage, UIQ, in this moment loses part of its sense because of the facts we all know... Probably there will be less and less applications for it now...
Belaga91
Model not set
Joined: Oct 27, 2008
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2008-10-29 22:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I really appreciate all the replies..but I should have added that I'm a big texter and I love emailing from my phone.
Santa_Claus
X1 Silver
Joined: Oct 18, 2008
Posts: 187
PM
Posted: 2008-10-29 22:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I would say go for G900.

Smartphone, good email features, touch screen, WiFi...
adnansanni
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM
Posted: 2008-10-30 05:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Hard core texting in C902 isn't best idea due to uncommon keypad style.
csarspjo
Model not set
Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Posts: 1
PM
Posted: 2008-10-31 05:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
G900 de hecho 5 mpx, wi-fi, gps, autorotate.... wowwwww SYMBIAN

salu2
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi