Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > k770 vs k810i - Camera quality

Author k770 vs k810i - Camera quality
momoki
W995 Silver
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 197
From: Singapore
PM
Posted: 2008-02-17 17:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i tink tat xenon flash is gd when wan to take pic at nite. but cant be use as light. but k770i also can take pic as nite, jus tat the flash is not as bright as k810i.

but k770i led flash has a lot of advantage than k810i flash where u can use for tat only camera function.

well...no regrets using k770i.

[ This Message was edited by: momoki on 2008-02-17 16:18 ]
dandy77
T68 gold
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2008-02-18 02:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Hello guys!
I've a question for you all. In the web I've seen many sample pics of K770, at different resolution. Some pics are at 2048x1536 mpixel, other pics at 2048x1538 mpixel. ( note 6 and 8 )
Anybody knows why? Different camera or software?
Thanks!

[ This Message was edited by: dandy77 on 2008-02-18 01:02 ]
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-20 07:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-18 02:01:21, dandy77 wrote:
Hello guys!
I've a question for you all. In the web I've seen many sample pics of K770, at different resolution. Some pics are at 2048x1536 mpixel, other pics at 2048x1538 mpixel. ( note 6 and 8 )
Anybody knows why? Different camera or software?
Thanks!

[ This Message was edited by: dandy77 on 2008-02-18 01:02 ]


i don't really know either. mine is 2048x1538. so when i resized it to VGA size, it becomes 640x481. but that's unique. [addsig]
dandy77
T68 gold
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 12:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-20 07:18:32, Amras wrote:

On 2008-02-18 02:01:21, dandy77 wrote:
Hello guys!
I've a question for you all. In the web I've seen many sample pics of K770, at different resolution. Some pics are at 2048x1536 mpixel, other pics at 2048x1538 mpixel. ( note 6 and 8 )
Anybody knows why? Different camera or software?
Thanks!

[ This Message was edited by: dandy77 on 2008-02-18 01:02 ]


i don't really know either. mine is 2048x1538. so when i resized it to VGA size, it becomes 640x481. but that's unique.


Mine is 2048x1538 too. Pics at this resolution are usually better than other... I'd like to know why...
Bezzz
K770 Brown
Joined: Oct 29, 2005
Posts: 152
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 22:23
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Mine's 2048x1536
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This comparasion it's useless.......did you guys ever seen a digi cam without a real flash?....K770/t650 have's LED so they are poor during the night......and stop comfort yourselfs cause you guys have a k770 and not a k810.......i've got a friend that haves a t650 and still crying because he didn't buy a k800/k810....k770 is worse than k800 in any situation trust me.......
momoki
W995 Silver
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 197
From: Singapore
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i stil love my k770i...no regrets.



[ This Message was edited by: momoki on 2008-02-20 22:19 ]
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
man i never said ...that k770 is a bad phone.......the phone is good....just not better than the k810
momoki
W995 Silver
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 197
From: Singapore
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
to me, its a GOOD phone!

didnt know tat overall it was better than k800i/k810i though.. u c the keypad, the size, the weight and the overall design! i jus cant imagine the review of k770i was much much more better...wooh!
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
k810 take better pics then T650 and K770...no doubt about that...
sure, you can get good pics with k770, but k810 is more "exact".
k770 have unequal pic quality, some pics looks great and some looks realy bad.there you have the major different between this two cameras

k810 have also more vivid colors and better sharpness.

like i said, k770 is no bad phone, but better then k810 ???? no way.

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-20 22:39 ]
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-20 23:07:28, Luci'sPower wrote:
This comparasion it's useless.......did you guys ever seen a digi cam without a real flash?....

So you mean that the K800 with it's Xenon flash is equal to a digicam?
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-20 23:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
no........i just said that it have's a real flash and k770 doesen't
Radiux399
T650 Blue
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM
Posted: 2008-02-21 00:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-20 23:17:29, Luci'sPower wrote:
man i never said ...that k770 is a bad phone.......the phone is good....just not better than the k810


Did you even look at the comparison shots on the 1st page?
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-21 05:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-20 23:35:00, plankgatan wrote:
k810 take better pics then T650 and K770...no doubt about that...
sure, you can get good pics with k770, but k810 is more "exact".
k770 have unequal pic quality, some pics looks great and some looks realy bad.there you have the major different between this two cameras

k810 have also more vivid colors and better sharpness.

like i said, k770 is no bad phone, but better then k810 ???? no way.

Is this your opinion only, or can you point to some examples of where the K770 is worse than the K810? BTW, did you look at the examples posted on the link (this) posted on page 2 of this thread?

My own take on the picture quality from these phones is that the K810 compared to the K770 is suffering from exactly the same problem a lot of people complain about when comparing the N95 with the K850, namely too much noise reduction and sharpening. To me the K770 photos look more natural.

Here's an example (from the same site linked above) which I think is very typical:
Which of the following two cropped photos do you think look better and which one of these looks like it came from the N95?



One more example, this time also showing that one of the cameras is having problems with the white balance (and this you can also see in the above example as well):



I would pick the K770 anytime before the K810 and not only due to better camera but also for the K810 looking b*tt-ugly with those stupid circular buttons. Where did they get those, from an old TV remote from the 70s?
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate


[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-02-21 05:14 ]
mode
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-21 06:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
What sensor does the K770 use because from the photo comparisons on the first page, the quality is reminiscent of the CCD sensors SE used to apply. And I think it is rightly better than K810 since it is a newer model (eventhough the model number is not greater, but that shouldn't the kind of quality we should expect).
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC*
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi