| Author |
3GP vs MP4 |
JethroUK
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 134
PM |
I have w880i (walkman sound), supports 320 x 240 video + 1 gb memory
Which is best video format to use on mobile phone? |
|
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@jet - I am very at EASE and USED in using video-files in 3gp format for my  fones . . . then and NOW.
If you want some video-file-conversion . . . try this:
http://media-convert.com/convert/
[addsig] |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
...which doesn't actually answer the question...
3gp is a subset of mp4 and so the quality is less but the payoff is that it is smaller
take your pic.. size or quality?
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-22 01:49:09, masseur wrote:
...which doesn't actually answer the question...
@masseur - I think the header states VERSUS  So, I will choose WHAT then - right? When you ask: David VS Goliath What will your response be or to make it more simplier and in laymen's term . . . Nokia VS . . .
So, my reply WAS: 3gp !
I always OPTED in using that as a video-format in my camfones . . .
[addsig] |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
your reply did not give any comparison (as in versus) between 3gp and mp4 with reasons for why you choose one over the other.
instead, you simply say that you find 3gp *easier* to use due to this link you have found and posted in many discussions
in these days of large memory sticks I prefer mp4 for the reasons stated although I still do have a large back catalog of video that have been converted to 3gp
|
DarkKrypt
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne,Australia
PM, WWW
|
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=157233&start=0
refer to my thread it will help you out with mp4 as it is better
thanks and enjoy:)
_________________
I
K610,  DS970,  880, 910(r.i.p), HPM-83, 200, K550
[ This Message was edited by: DarkKrypt on 2008-01-22 01:49 ] |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-01-22 01:49:09, masseur wrote:
...which doesn't actually answer the question...
3gp is a subset of mp4 and so the quality is less but the payoff is that it is smaller
take your pic.. size or quality?
I thought 3gp was invented long before mp4? Its a different standard so how can it be a subset of a later standard, unless its 3gp2 (or 3gpp)?
I think I gotta do some reason on this. |
hecter
Joined: Jan 09, 2008
Posts: 8
From: bangalore INDIA
PM |
Mp4 is good we have 2gb memory then why should we go for 3gp which is not good |
jakontil
Joined: Jun 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Changi, Chatswood, Cikarang
PM |
i am with MP4 for now and then, the extra size worth every byte 
I  capturing sexy women on the beach  I  This message was posted from an iphone |
admad
Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
mp4 is definetly better, better video quality and sound. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
I recently tested some encoded clips from a new program and 3GP and mp4 were both the same quality wise. MP4 was a bit bigger in file size but thats about it. It all depends on what format you use. 3GP or MP4 is just the container like AVI or mpeg. It really depends on what its encoded as. It could be Divx, xvid, h263 (most common for SE phones) or H264 (doesnt work well on SE phones as only the top ones have ability to play this but its low baseline).
H264 is the best. Whether thats in 3GP or MP4 doesnt create that much of a difference to be honest.
|
shyam335
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: 127.0.0.1
PM |
Exactly,both of em are containers.They hardly influence the quality of the stream.
and 3gp is a subset of mp4.3gp is simpler and was made with mobile devices in mind. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-22 01:36
capturing sexy women on the beach 
