| Author |
The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008 |
moogoo
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: NYC
PM, WWW
|
I'm very impressed by the g series thus far. I'd love to try them but probably won't get a chance since i'm in the states |
|
|
clauf
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Why didn't they use those icons and interface... it looks better in the video.
It's either a 906i phone, Paris, or a G900. I was very impressed when I saw the G900 but too bad it's not a quaband or UIQ 3.3 [but I can't tell the difference now?].
[ This Message was edited by: clauf on 2008-05-19 06:43 ]
[ This Message was edited by: clauf on 2008-05-19 06:46 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
Integrating the long awaited WiFi b/g combo, Flash Lite 3 and torch feature on G900 was the best thing i would like to note about it  it's just confusing that the developer's site only listed WLAN 802.11b while the second release(which i strongly believe was the final one already) whitepaper confirms that it's both WiFi b & g. the Flash Lite 3.0 feature wasn't even listed either on the G900 specs on that siteas well but in whitepaper it was there. seems like they've copy-pasted P1's specs on it causing it to raise confusions over there. i hope SE would revise them all to prevent ambiguity. as a UIQ phone G900 is so far the highest spec'd SE on the smartphone line(excluding X1 of course) before paris arrives
One question, when will the rumored WLAN accessory arrives? 
10 years at Esato |
n3o
Joined: Sep 02, 2005
Posts: 427
PM |
which one would that be?! |
Yakkaimono
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 425
From: Germany/ Bangladesh
PM |
Do you mean the WLAN enabler razec?
Isn't it just a piece of internal hardware for the upcoming A300? |
xell
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-19 02:01:50, Pop Lover wrote:
G700 turn 
I really like the song. Only W890's song is better... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae5XfeKFPR8 |
Caspa
Joined: Nov 28, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK.
PM |
@Dogmann
I'm deadly serious... I'm referring to (my experience of) real users of 'smartphones' who tend to be using the device simply for the corporate email... And in this instance, specifically Blackberry users like all those at my company.... I understand that certain 'power' users are concerned with data speeds but a large chunk of 'smartphone' users are not using vast amounts of data and therefore are not overly concerned with speeds.
@Theos
Yeah, I have to use both hands on a high maintenance woman rather than just the single handed groping that a non high maintenance lady allows!?!!!
@Prom1
Its not related to that function i'm afraid mate... The phone doesnt give you any indication of a call until it has rung on the callers end a couple of times, this has been tested and proven by myself (worked in the telecommunication industry for 5 years, 5 years ago so still have good general knowledge) and a colleague (who has a degree in computer science so is pretty good also!)
The main point I was making was the fact that nearly all of the Blackberrys we have seem to have had at least one fault along the way, and the general user consensus is that they dont work well as actual phones. I use a P1, and have come to accept that its works better as a phone, but is more sluggish with regards to email... |
BoyBawang
Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Posts: 332
PM |
More paris night and ourdoor pics! thanks to gliatiotis.
please don't blame me for ruining your day guys.
in fairness to SE, these pictures are shot in the worst lighting condition
|
Keiki
Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 160
From: Valhalla
PM |
Not bad... not bad...
This message was posted from BlackBerry 8900 |
jalf
Joined: Jan 09, 2006
Posts: 189
From: Lisboa, Portugal
PM |
people should post only pictures taken in good conditions... light, focus, etc.. |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
Guys,
DON'T worry about Pnext specs.
Confirmed, be calm!
(that's all I can say).
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2008-05-19 12:45 ] |
jalf
Joined: Jan 09, 2006
Posts: 189
From: Lisboa, Portugal
PM |
On 2008-05-19 13:44:08, doministry wrote:
Guys,
DON'T worry about Pnext specs.
Confirmed, be calm!
(that's all I can say).
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2008-05-19 12:45 ]
confirmed what? |
pavlov's_dog
Joined: Jun 15, 2004
Posts: 163
PM |
@dom,
can you tell us more about what you cannot say? wink |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
On 2008-05-19 13:44:08, doministry wrote:
Guys,
DON'T worry about Pnext specs.
Confirmed, be calm!
(that's all I can say).
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2008-05-19 12:45 ]
that what is confirmed? |
iksplusipsilon
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: 303
PM |
@doministry
208, no?
@apolloa
I quit...you operate with so many false assumptions that I just don't know what to answer ... ( wher did I EVER expressed the desire for optical zoom ?! ... + yes, I have decent camera already ... )
[ This Message was edited by: theos on 2008-05-19 13:02 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-19 07:38
