| Author |
Leaked: Sony Ericsson C905 (codename: Shiho) |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-11 23:26:07, Dextrr wrote:
There we go all over again! Fix this, fix that, try +/- ISO, use this or that mode ...
There are camera phones on the market that can take a decent picture on AUTO mode without the hassle of fixing it later.
As you said - on the market. This is a freaking unannounced prototype! Don't you get it?
|
|
|
karlosperu
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Los Olivos - Lima - Peru
PM |
videocall camera???
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: giancito on 2008-06-11 22:45 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2008-06-20 10:14 ] |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
They better sort out the colours and the haze.
Mizzle, whats C905's focal length? what does it say around the camera lense? |
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-06-11 23:36:06, NightBlade wrote:
you increeased the yellows too much. The pics should be a tad colder.
You're right, but i like it that way. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
3264 x 2448.... that i really like 
focal lenght is lovely 5.91mm
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-11 22:49 ] |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
Ah ok 5.9 focal length. Seems kinda promising... |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
5.91mm (591/100mm) for be exact
and guys, im 100% sure this is just some crappy beta cam driver version. will not sell their new flagship with this cam-quality
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-11 22:54 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Here's what it can easily look like, after a mere 30 seconds in Photoshop.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
he he he. now we talking.
just relax guys, c905 will be MUCH improved when its ready
|
Dextrr
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Posts: 279
From: New York
PM |
On 2008-06-11 23:42:10, Mizzle wrote:
As you said - on the market. This is a freaking unannounced prototype! Don't you get it?
Calm down! Don't pop a blood vessel now.
But really, the camera quality sucks and with SE's track record, it will still suck when it's out. I bet you my lunch money on it! lol |
dcbastable
Joined: May 01, 2006
Posts: 198
From: South East London
PM |
I am, and probably will allways be, a Sony Ericsson user. And i must say that the C905 does seem to tick a lot of box's. However, why give us an 8mp camera without an optical zoom??? I would much prefer a 5mp camera with the addition of an optical zoom. Samsung are allready on the case with this - they have just released details of the G800 replacement, the G810 which yet again has an optical zoom. Lets not forget, Sharp had a the 903 model almost 3 years ago with an optical zoom. I would have thought that with Sony's Cybershot expertise that SE would be the leading force in cam phone technology. Since their brilliant K800i (which i miss) they have been playing catch up to the likes of Nokia, Samsung and even LG.
'We are in the stickiest situation since Sticky the stick insect got stuck on a sticky bun' |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-12 00:05:19, Dextrr wrote:
On 2008-06-11 23:42:10, Mizzle wrote:
As you said - on the market. This is a freaking unannounced prototype! Don't you get it?
Calm down! Don't pop a blood vessel now.
But really, the camera quality sucks and with SE's track record, it will still suck when it's out. I bet you my lunch money on it! lol
I wouldn't be surprised if you'll be admitting you're blind in a second...
|
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
5 seconds in Photoshop, 5 seconds on Noiseware Community. Surely the final software will produce something like this.
 |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
You really nailed it with that pic, Mizzle.
BTW, we can stop fixing the colours now... I think we all got the idea.
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-06-11 23:09 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
CANT understand this talk about optical zoom.
optical zoom sucks in cell phones (just look at the pics with example Samsung or SO905iCS) they looks not good at all at 3 x zoom. if you want good zoom quality you really need BIG good lenses and thats nearly impossible for a tiny cell phone.
second, optical zoom make your phone much thicker, (and that we dont want)
i vote NO for optical zoom
and yes for slim design
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-11 23:12 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-06-11 23:42
