| Author |
K800 camera outperforms N95 |
RevoWution
Joined: May 26, 2007
Posts: 231
From: New Zealand
PM |
You have clearly won this debate, Blutarsky. QVGA is speechless 
Therefore the verdict is settled: K800i > N95 
Sony Ericsson K800i (Concrete Silver) w/ R8BA024 Taiwan Casino Royale firmware, 2GB M2 memory card w/ various mods. My Wordpress Blog | |
|
Blutarsky
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 136
PM, WWW
|
Hehheheeeee, I didn't want to win anyhting, just comparing the cams of the two.
But it looked like that, in the end, QVGA didn't comment at all phonearen's pics & comparison..... quite a recent comparison.... |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
have still not seen any N95 pics who have "better" quality then k810/k800 !
when is they coming ?
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-06-12 13:21 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
its so pathetic reading you peoples comments, there're two comparison shots of N95 against K800, one of the coin and the other of the tree where N95 buries the K800 alive.
You people post random pics taken by K800 and then demand N95's comparison, well the comparison is infront of you.
and its funny seeing that antochrist says N95 "lacks of color" whereas golden face says it "over do the colors" . Two opposite claims by people against N95.
And whilst we're talking about "camera" of these phones, N95 more than makes up for its odd bad shot with its fantastic video recording. Dont forget video recording is part of the camera.
[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2007-06-12 13:27 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
pathetic ? (why should they be pathetic). i think its pathetic that some people (no name) cant agree that example N95 have a lot of problems and that N95 pics often is not so good as k810/k800 !
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-06-12 14:33:11, plankgatan wrote:
pathetic ? (why should they be pathetic). i think its pathetic that some people (no name) cant agree that example N95 have a lot of problems and that N95 pics often is not so good as k810/k800 !
do you have a disability where you're only able to read the first part of the post?
[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2007-06-12 13:40 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
would you please stop. look around, its nearlly non who agree with you. |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
For now Nokia has the best image quality compared to Sony Ericsson. No doubt about that. The images shot with N95 are quite fantastic! The reason why those you guys have seen aren't good, is a firmware fault that automatically sets the sharpness to "high" when choosing scenes. Just press back to normal, and you'll have great quality.
|
Blutarsky
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 136
PM, WWW
|
QVGA please comment this picture:
Phonearena comparison, may 2007
Please comment N95 and K800 pics
[ This Message was edited by: Blutarsky on 2007-06-12 16:08 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-06-12 17:07:45, Blutarsky wrote:
QVGA please comment this picture:
Image removed
Phonearena comparison, may 2007
Please comment N95 and K800 pics
[ This Message was edited by: Blutarsky on 2007-06-12 16:08 ]
I'll do it. Why don't you zoom out so the N95 pic shows the motive as K800? Clearly you can see that the N95's pic is zoomed / closer to the motive than the one from K800.
Edit: and keep in mind that the new firmware for N95 (I'd bet this one is from the first firmware) gives better photos.
[ This Message was edited by: thecoolsha on 2007-06-12 16:16 ] |
Blutarsky
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 136
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-06-12 17:15:19, thecoolsha wrote:
(CUT)
Why don't you try to read the article instead just answering without investigating yourself?
1) The images are 100% crops of the original, there's no need to zoom.
2) The article was published in MAY 2007, what early firmware are you talking about?
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-06-12 17:21:31, Blutarsky wrote:
On 2007-06-12 17:15:19, thecoolsha wrote:
(CUT)
Why don't you try to read the article instead just answering without investigating yourself?
1) The images are 100% crops of the original, there's no need to zoom.
2) The article was published in MAY 2007, what early firmware are you talking about?
I know that they are crops - if you resize the N95's picture to 2048 x 1536 pixels, it would have been better than the one from K800. That's what I meant.
About the firmware, Nokia released a new firmware on the 5th of May, meaning that the test unit they used could still be on the old firmware. These photos were most likely shot earlier than the article was published.
EDIT: And if you really must use that site, then why don't get all the info and results in on it, too, huh?
Test 1: Pictures, taken in the open, in broad daylight
The phones' performance, sorted from 1st to 5th place:
1) N95: N95 is capable of reproducing neutral colors situations best, but, unfortunately, they are all deliberately oversaturated. The brightly-lit objects burn easily, unlike D900. The 5 megapixels provide quite a lot of detail, but some pictures are blurred due to the noise reduction system.
2) K800: Wildly fighting for the first place, but the limitation of the 2 megapixels impacts the pictures negatively. It performs best as far as colors and exposition are concerned.
Теst 2: Nighttime pictures
The phones' performance, sorted from 1st to 5th place:
1) N95: The impact of the noise reduction system is felt, since almost everything is blurred, but the correct exposition and the realistic colors make the pictures look better than those of the competition.
2) К800: The situation with К800 is the same as N95. The reduced resolution is a shortcoming, depriving the phone of the gold medal.
Test 3: Pictures at artificial light: different power, different distances
The phones' performance, sorted from 1st to 5th place:
1) К800: the powerful flash provides the best lighting from different distances, but the enhanced sensitivity results in blurred detail .
2) N95: at close-ups the LED flash lights the objects and the pictures turn out fine, but it is helpless at greater distances.
Теst 4: Test situation: colors and resolution
The phones' performance, sorted from 1st to 5th place:
1) N95: the combination of realistic colors and high resolution earn this phone the first place.
2) К800: again, it loses to N95 due to its 3 megapixels.
Теst 5: Macro
The phones' performance, sorted from 1st to 5th place:
1) КG920: thanks to the small distance, at which the camera focuses correctly ad the CCD matrix, providing a very detailed image, КG920 is the undisputed leader!
2) N95: The second 5-megapixels phone takes the second place in the macro category.
3) D900: the Samsung can also do a close-up, but it does not provide as much detail as that of КG920.
5) К800: In certain conditions К800 is not able to focus (a bright lit object in bright light), no matter ho hard we tried.
Overall: Total Rating
1) Nokia N95 4.6 (of 5) Perfect result, living up to our expectations!
2) Sony Ericsson K800 3.6 (of 5) The previous leader is still going strong.
_________________
what's this space for?
[ This Message was edited by: thecoolsha on 2007-06-12 16:34 ] |
Blutarsky
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 136
PM, WWW
|
Test 1
1) N95: N95 is capable of reproducing neutral colors situations best, but, unfortunately, they are all deliberately oversaturated. The brightly-lit objects burn easily, unlike D900. The 5 megapixels provide quite a lot of detail, but some pictures are blurred due to the noise reduction system.
2) K800: Wildly fighting for the first place, but the limitation of the 2 megapixels impacts the pictures negatively. It performs best as far as colors and exposition are concerned.
Read: N95 has problems with, colors and blur, K800 even if limited by 1.8mpx has better colors and exposition and my eyes tell me the quality is best.
About the size/zoom/scale KG920 pics have the same size of N95, without suffering N95 problems.......
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-06-12 17:49:49, Blutarsky wrote:
Test 1
1) N95: N95 is capable of reproducing neutral colors situations best, but, unfortunately, they are all deliberately oversaturated. The brightly-lit objects burn easily, unlike D900. The 5 megapixels provide quite a lot of detail, but some pictures are blurred due to the noise reduction system.
2) K800: Wildly fighting for the first place, but the limitation of the 2 megapixels impacts the pictures negatively. It performs best as far as colors and exposition are concerned.
Read: N95 has problems with, colors and blur, K800 even if limited by 1.8mpx has better colors and exposition and my eyes tell me the quality is best.
I know, but still, N95 won.
About the size/zoom/scale KG920 pics have the same size of N95, without suffering N95 problems.......
but KG920 has a problem with colors and sharpness. Besides, it's absolutely useless for photographing. It takes about 20 seconds to start camera, shot a picture and save it. That's just too long. |
Blutarsky
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 136
PM, WWW
|
Ok mate, buy a N95 and happy shooting!
[ This Message was edited by: Blutarsky on 2007-06-12 17:54 ] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2007-06-12 13:31
