Author |
K850 Firmware Overview |
shernon8 Joined: Apr 16, 2008 Posts: 53 PM |
On 2008-06-15 19:58:24, SupermansZ24 wrote:
I personally wouldn't update yet because the CDA looks messed on Da Vinci.
It should be 1201-0095 or 1201-0089 but they have it listed as 123456.
Something is definitely not right with their firmware
you are correct SupermansZ24 the CDA is really weird. i wouldnt update to R1F until released on SEUS.. i really hope it is realeased on SEUS this week....
[ This Message was edited by: shernon8 on 2008-06-15 20:18 ] |
|
Tervel Joined: Jun 30, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: US, TX PM |
Duran > The cam driver is 3.7 as opposed to the 2.9 I have been using. Non the less, it performs near-flawlessly in night shots. Look at the two shots below - both taken from about six inches and I even used a white background to see how the flash will perform - it didn't blow out at all!
This image doesn't look very sharp but I don't think I had finished focusing when I took it.
This one looks great IMO - very busy background and VERY close - 6 inches to the closest subject, maybe 15 to the furthest.
|
Duran Joined: Aug 25, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
On 2008-06-15 21:48:17, Tervel wrote:
Duran > The cam driver is 3.7 as opposed to the 2.9 I have been using. Non the less, it performs near-flawlessly in night shots. Look at the two shots below - both taken from about six inches and I even used a white background to see how the flash will perform - it didn't blow out at all!
Yes, but that 3.7 driver existed since R1EA037 which has been out for 2-3months |
Adil786uk Joined: Mar 17, 2007 Posts: 99 PM |
Flash works alright. I think I need to clean my sensor though and is it me or what but when the exposure is is set high the camera movement is kinda slow.
Cleaned the sensor, now much better image:
More pictures took:
[ This Message was edited by: Adil786uk on 2008-06-15 23:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Adil786uk on 2008-06-15 23:09 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Adil786uk on 2008-06-15 23:14 ] |
Wild Child Joined: Jan 14, 2008 Posts: 152 PM |
It is just a generic cda. It comes up on the phone as 1200-4400 R1FA035 080527. Mine was APAC-ANZ prior to flashing. Just cause the camera driver is the same doesnt mean it wasnt tweaked to give a better output. Still may be the same driver but it does appear that the pictures are better.
WC
R1FA035
18:11:11| Profiling SEMC phone...
18:11:11| Platform: DB3150
18:11:11| OTP CID: 52
18:11:11| EROM CID: 52
18:11:11| EROM Color: Red
18:11:11| IMEI: 35182902xxxxxx
18:11:11| Phone ID: K850
18:11:11| Region: AMERICA
18:11:11| CDA: 1200-0000 R11A
18:11:11| Firmware Version: R1FA035
18:11:11| EROM: 1200-4341 SEMCBOOT R6A008
R1EA037
18:21:49| Profiling SEMC phone...
18:21:49| Platform: DB3150
18:21:49| OTP CID: 52
18:21:49| EROM CID: 52
18:21:49| EROM Color: Red
18:21:49| IMEI: 35887401xxxxxx
18:21:49| Phone ID: K850
18:21:49| Region: HONG-KONG
18:21:49| CDA: 1201-6664 R8A
18:21:49| Firmware Version: R1EA037
18:21:49| EROM: 1200-4341 SEMCBOOT R6A008
[ This Message was edited by: Wild Child on 2008-06-15 23:24 ] |
br@dley Joined: Nov 25, 2007 Posts: 64 PM |
On 2008-06-14 14:19:17, masada1971 wrote:
mine too..any solutions to this?even with iso set to 100,same again..too white pics
As mentioned many times in this thread make sure the light sensor is clean. Use a toothpick to clean out any dirt etc from the small hole near the flash.
The problem is it gets full of dirt very quickly so you have to clena it often.
If you do that and keep your fingers away from the front of the phone you shouldn't have a problem with the flash. |
Targett Joined: Sep 27, 2005 Posts: 120 From: Sandy Beds PM |
Bye bye K850, hello C902!
(Lets just hope the problems don't hapen in thes new one?!) |
mr versatile Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 120 PM |
Guys those pics really starting to look good you can definitly see a difference but, i am wondering still why would davinci get this firmware and sony not releasing it ,........my take on this is that sony have the full version of the (R1F) and they pre release this to see the response they would get because the firmware is definitly to simple for this big secret or hold back so they are up to some thing thats why the cda looks weird or is weird i am just trying to analyze this whole thing its not making sense
any one notice in this r1f firmy if the light sensor works any at all the sensor in front of the phone left hand corner ....
[ This Message was edited by: mr versatile on 2008-06-15 23:56 ] |
Wild Child Joined: Jan 14, 2008 Posts: 152 PM |
My Conclusions on R1FA035 Firmware:
Picture quality is greatly improved.
Battery life 12 hours with bluetooth h500,text messaging,checking email. From full charge to 70%.
Sound while playing mp3,no headset,louder
MP4 still out of sync
New options is a plus
Overall responsiveness greatly improved
Havent had a restart
[ This Message was edited by: Wild Child on 2008-06-16 00:38 ] |
fullforce Joined: Oct 12, 2005 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden PM |
Has anyone with the new firmware noticed any difference with the dampened/muffled sound in the mediaplayer when listening to music on high sound levels? That really anoyes me!
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2008-06-16 00:01 ] |
Duran Joined: Aug 25, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
On 2008-06-16 01:00:45, Wild Child wrote:
My Conclusions:
Picture quality is greatly improved.
Battery life 12 hours with bluetooth h500,text messaging,checking email. From full charge to 70%.
Sound while playing mp3,no headset,louder
MP4 still out of sync
New options is a plus
Overall responsiveness greatly improved
Havent had a restart
and you were on R1EA037 before? |
will5 Joined: Jun 15, 2008 Posts: 19 PM |
Ill take some pictures...ohh wait...I dont have a cell phone, just a nice brick!
Anyway, mp4 still out of sync?
I think that the retarded enginners at sony, overclock memory, processor or anything to make the system faster, that was causing ocassional reboot, and file system corruption or brod....just a guess...some phones tolerate overclock better and some phones get brod....
Anyone test updating a brod k850 with a newer firm by seus? if the same firmware updating, nothing happens, but if update to a new firmware, something happen?
[ This Message was edited by: will5 on 2008-06-16 00:30 ] |
Wild Child Joined: Jan 14, 2008 Posts: 152 PM |
Actually I was on 031, the picture below was the same flower @3mp auto everything else on the 031 firmware just to compare pictures with newer firmware@5mp auto on everything.As you can see the quality is still crappy and the picture is abit blurry.pixelated abit.
WC
[ This Message was edited by: Wild Child on 2008-06-16 00:30 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Wild Child on 2008-06-16 00:35 ] |
Wild Child Joined: Jan 14, 2008 Posts: 152 PM |
No new update from SEUS yet.
On 2008-06-16 01:27:21, will5 wrote:
Anyone test updating a brod k850 with a newer firm by seus? if the same firmware updating, nothing happens, but if update to a new firmware, something happen?
[ This Message was edited by: will5 on 2008-06-16 00:30 ]
|
masada1971 Joined: Jun 05, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
what are they waiting over there at seus??c'mon gyus wake up!!!give the new firmie to the people...
[ This Message was edited by: masada1971 on 2008-06-16 00:38 ] |
|