| Author |
c902 vs N82 vs Moto ZN5 comparision |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The C905 is holder of the most aggressive post-processing , the Zn5's isnt that bad it doesn't turn the pictures into smears, like the C902's which was proved here
 |
|
|
Aware
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Oxon, UK
PM |
...erm, you actually HOLD a ZN5 yet, plank?? Because both of the ones I have played with to date(from O2 btw) absolutely DEMOLISH C902 for build quality, screen quality(2.4" against 2"), audio quality...and general 'cool' factor(read that as stares/questions from other people, which new SEs just don't get anymore)...... 
In fact, I'd go so far as to say C902 is plenty more '####' than ZN5 as a device, regardless of which one actually produces [marginally] better images...... 
I went for N82 myself btw...which incidentally cost less than either of the two dumbphones, but for me, covers more bases than both put together......
 p990i(r6d), n82-1(20.0.062) * treat people as you expect to be treated! * a-zott platinum/tttt in ~3 years...  rip expanded call lists! |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
of course i hold it. (i try many new phones (in store most of the time), still tried it.
im not saying zn5 have a bad camera......i say 2 things.
1.
in this test (oblivious) there came zn5 last, and n82 and c902 came on top, they handle different light conditions in a better way (oblivious).
(i dont buy for ONE minute that zn5 is some perfect point & shooter)
2.
zn5 as a cellphone is not very great.... (yeh, must be nice sometime)
------------------------------------------
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-24 12:11 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
http://img2.abload.de/img/kdk_0116t8s.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tnkgrl/sets/72157611083097353/
http://www.dcview.com.tw/article/newreadarticle.asp?id=6999
http://board.phonehk.com/view[....]ge=1&extra=page%3D1#pid4109018
moreover if pictures from 1st page don't lie then what about pictures from my links? earlier you said that C902 have old firmware, can you imagine that Zn5 have old firmware too?
if Zn5 have "very agressive post-processing" then what kind of post-processing have C902 if Zn5 can save often much more details on pictures?
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
number1. IM NOT saying c902 have better full size quality, BUT SERIOUSLY, WHO GIVES A SHIT HOW A CELLPHONE LOOKS IN (2592 x 1944) ??? i care how it looks in 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768...or do you print out your cellphone pics in A1 size ???? he he
besides, you find crops there c902 is far better..(so its nothing special with some crops here and there
c902
zn5
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-24 12:02 ] |
recl
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
Posts: 251
From: Romania
PM |
he he some people are retarded hehe they should log out immediately he he |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
well, here comes one.
a tip.... dont call people retards, i got nearly banned when i said so long time ago 
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
Checking the Zn5 pics in the photosection & flickr , they look nothing like what your posting. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
you started comparision then be brave and accept some uncomfortable facts
some missed pictures from 'your' test
C902 http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/04b.jpg
Zn5 http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/04d.jpg
C902 http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/07b.jpg
Zn5 http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/07d.jpg
C902 http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/08b.jpg
Zn5 http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/08d.jpg
another set
http://www.mobilport.hu/?r=15943&p=1
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-04-24 12:16 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
2 issues from Zn5
- looks like it cannot handle proper exposure when use xenon
- sometimes auto exposure cannot find proper value and pictures are a bit too dark
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-04-24 12:36 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
raederski, i said (clearly) that it was easier if you went in yourself and look at all pics.....(hard to upload 15 x 3 pics )
i thought it would be quite unnecessary to upload 8 outdoor pics and thats it (you follow me )
it gives hardly some true result about a camera if you just upload daylight pics, or am i wrong
so of course i tried to upload..indoor, macro, night, landscape, outdoor...so much who was possible)...
and yeh, ZN5 have GREAT daylight quality but in this test, with different light condition, there came N82 and c902 out on top
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
sure thing, that's why instead of pics I prefer to post links
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2009-04-24 12:57:21, plankgatan wrote:
number1. IM NOT saying c902 have better full size quality, BUT SERIOUSLY, WHO GIVES A SHIT HOW A CELLPHONE LOOKS IN (2592 x 1944) ??? i care how it looks in 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768...or do you print out your cellphone pics in A1 size ???? he he
As i said before 50inch screens do exist and maybe 1 day you would like to print a small sized poster, it would be nice to have the fullsized quality to do so otherwise whats the point in 5mp???, if you do just view your pics in 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768 , then why do you have a 5mp camphone and go around everywhere saying what fantasic quality it has??? , a 5mp pic resized all the way down to 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768 will always have great quality no matter what device took it. |
alexander87
Joined: Oct 27, 2006
Posts: 225
From: doesn't matter...I kick ass ev
PM |
OMG plank.
One conclusion.
Are you brainwashed? ))
The ZN5 is a good point and shoot.
Go back and compare the camera launch times, saving picture times, shutter speed\lag, autofocus speed, and why not its speed in gallery where you can see the quality IPU that is used in the unit.
Based on which of the above mentioned algorithms you decided that the C902 is a better POINT and SHOOT?
Never mind the camera quality because here is clear that C902 has no chance (purple fringe baby, yeaaah) )
I have a ZN5 for 4 months now and i can say that i'm happy with it apart from the OS which sucks at user friendliness when compared to the SE's OS.
[ This Message was edited by: alexander87 on 2009-04-24 13:05 ] There are no more barriers to cross. All I have in common with the uncontrollable and the insane, the vicious and the evil, all the mayhem I have caused and my utter indifference toward it I have now surpassed.
|
estatophan
Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Posts: 23
PM |
why are some people gratefully biased at comparison. |
|
|
Posted: 2009-04-24 12:42
p990i(r6d), n82-1(20.0.062)
