| Author |
Why do you choose SE over Nokia? |
se_love
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
You see though the problem is that wel he complains about all that when his latest SE is the K850. That there for me at least labels you as a whiner. And the 3.5mm thing well i dont get whytf you guys bother so yeah. Also hmm my first phone was a moto V180 and yet i go for SE. kind of like me starting of with a playstation ending up being a ninty nutjob.
[ This Message was edited by: se_love on 2009-03-03 15:14 ] |
|
|
anonymuser
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-03-03 16:13:25, se_love wrote:
You see though the problem is that wel he complains about all that when his latest SE is the K850. That there for me at least labels you as a whiner. And the 3.5mm thing well i dont get whytf you guys bother so yeah. Also hmm my first phone was a moto V180 and yet i go for SE. kind of like me starting of with a playstation ending up being a ninty nutjob.
[ This Message was edited by: se_love on 2009-03-03 15:14 ]
Can anyone translate?
|
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
Ive used W350, W302, W760, and C902 just the other day, still not impressed at all. 
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
hyperken
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Malaysia
PM |
I like all-in-one device concept, uiq symbian platform, touch screen, camera quality, music quality, design, usability and etc...
T18>T68i>P910i>P1i>Samsung Galaxy Note
32MB>256MB>1GB>1GB M2>2GB M2>16GB M2>32GB SanDisk MicroSDHC |
se_love
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-03-03 16:20:08, Boinng wrote:
On 2009-03-03 16:13:25, se_love wrote:
You see though the problem is that wel he complains about all that when his latest SE is the K850. That there for me at least labels you as a whiner. And the 3.5mm thing well i dont get whytf you guys bother so yeah. Also hmm my first phone was a moto V180 and yet i go for SE. kind of like me starting of with a playstation ending up being a ninty nutjob.
[ This Message was edited by: se_love on 2009-03-03 15:14 ]
Can anyone translate?
He complains about Se when really is latest is the K850 which is the worst way to judge SE and such so yeah. That last bit is about me saying how while i might have started out with motorola loving it i know hate it and am with SE. Samething with video games for me, |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
@se_love
You shouldn't have bothered "translating". Trust me.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
-Because of the simple UI and beautiful designs.
-The Cyber Shot phones and the "like digitial camera style" 
-Play/pause button
-Brighter screen
-Better price, at least here in my country a good Nokia is too expensive
ex. You can buy a K850i for US$180 or less and the N82 is up to $US 300
-Xenon flash and torch light
Those are my main reasons though I m using an iPhone 3G now 
[ This Message was edited by: Coquito on 2009-03-03 16:29 ] |
anonymuser
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-03-03 16:55:59, se_love wrote:
He complains about Se when really is latest is the K850 which is the worst way to judge SE and such so yeah.
Why is it the worst way to judge SE - because it's a bad phone? SE are a phone company, aren't they? The K850 was one of their biggest product launches in its year, no? The point is, whether you like it or not, many people bought the K850 and discovered it was a bad product, and that will be colouring many people's opinions of SE. That's how this works.
For a long time I loved SE partly because of the memory of a few good phones, when in reality the phones I had from them in later years were quite poor. Those early impressions work both ways.
That last bit is about me saying how while i might have started out with motorola loving it i know hate it and am with SE. Samething with video games for me,
Still don't understand the video game bit, sorry. You seem to be saying that people's opinons/tastes can change, and well, yep. But again, it works both ways.
|
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
Wish I could take SE build quality and Nokia guts and mesh them together. I love S60 and Nokia's menus/layout, but I detest the build quality of most of their phones (N85 is a good example. One word - garbage). SE for the US market lacks 3G choices (yes there's a few) where Nokia has "quite" a few. Let alone it'd be nice to see GPS & wifi standard on all SE phones.
That said I'm about to pick up a T700. Yes it lack the bells and whistles, but again I want that stellar SE build quality.
|
Brightspark
Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 326
From: UK
PM |
On 2009-03-03 19:08:16, Paul in LA wrote:
Wish I could take SE build quality and Nokia guts and mesh them together. I love S60 and Nokia's menus/layout, but I detest the build quality of most of their phones (N85 is a good example. One word - garbage). SE for the US market lacks 3G choices (yes there's a few) where Nokia has "quite" a few. Let alone it'd be nice to see GPS & wifi standard on all SE phones.
That said I'm about to pick up a T700. Yes it lack the bells and whistles, but again I want that stellar SE build quality.
what is this "steller build quality" that you speak of?
SE is well known to have poor build quality, but you haven't woken up to that fact yet.
[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2009-03-03 19:11 ] |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
So nice to see how people build up their points by providing citations and proof to give their arguments some depth.... not.
|
StevenC
Joined: Aug 23, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: NY
PM |
I like Sony Ericsson because it is Sony Ericsson. No other phones are better than SE to me.
Also I find Nokia phones ugly, or at least not compatible with my tastes.
|
Brightspark
Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 326
From: UK
PM |
i would choose the nokia over an SE.
-neither are known for their reliability, but nokia suffers less in this department.
-nokia designs are far more variable
-nokia software is more stable than the ever-wobbly a100 and a200
-SE charges too much for too little, whereas nokias are priced more fairly
-nokia has a better sense of standards than SE, the latter continually stubbornly refusing to adhere to standards
-build quality of nokias tends to be somewhat higher
-nokias have better audio quality
-nokias definitely have significantly better reception and call quality
On 2009-03-03 20:29:29, blerk wrote:
So nice to see how people build up their points by providing citations and proof to give their arguments some depth.... not.
are you referring to my posts!? perhaps you need to rectify your gnat-like memory. you've obviously forgotten about:
-the infamous joysticks
-the crazy cracking keypads due to green paint on the s500(both models) w595and (oops, this was SEs silly unbelievable excuse)
-the fast port connector forever going belly up
-the sheer regularity and consistency of hardware(and software) problems reported by users on forums and to retailers
-articles such as thishttp://www.whatmobile.net[....]lity_called_into_question.html
does that point to steller built quality, or the reverse?
[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2009-03-03 20:03 ] |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
On 2009-03-03 20:29:29, blerk wrote:
So nice to see how people build up their points by providing citations and proof to give their arguments some depth.... not.
Ouch! Cranky a tad, huh? Compared to Nokia, SE phones have much better build quality IMO. |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
Why SE over Nokia?
Because Nokia styling is bland, their Amour phones are odd, there premium phones (8800, Vertu) are underfeatured, their UI is awkward, their txt entry style is awkward, their styling is bland, their font is way too small, I don't like the standby screen notifications, their smartphones are irrelevant (as proved by the iPhone) and their styling is bland.
Did I mention their styling is Bland?
I liked the N95 1GB but it's price was too high for me. I seriously considered it before I got the iPhone 3G but I know I made the right choice. Another highlight was the 6234, I bought one for my son (for $20 why not?), he liked it but I grew to hate it's UI and at full price it was poor value compared to the V630i let alone the amazing V640i.
No other Nokias appeal to me at all, especially since SE are finally putting wifi in the mid-range.
Just my opinion.
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-03-03 16:13
