Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Why do you choose SE over Nokia?

123 ... 111213  Next
Author Why do you choose SE over Nokia?
ranzon
W902 Black
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
Posts: 41
From: western eu up
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 10:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Got a problem" =/ Want to use One phone, not two. Got a W902 and a Nokia N79, and i love them both, and they fill my daily needs in different ways. W902 with its amazing sound, very handy camera, TrackId, and the whole easy way of using it.

Nokia with its Gps ability, got Garmin on it so works like real gps.
A bit mediocre music quality compared to W902, camera is annoying, for instance its red video recording light, it has no TrackId..
And a few other minor things i miss.
But these are just my needs, for the common people its still a better phone.
Simply has Alot more features.

So why get an expensive SE when most nokias do more for mostly a lower price?
[ This Message was edited by: ranzon on 2009-03-02 09:44 ]
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 11:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Because of the design. Nokia sucks at the design part. Their phones just look so goddamn boring.
Because of the UI. SE's is the best interface I've ever had the pleasure of using. Period. It's fast. It's straightforward. It's intuitive. It has flashy animations (important!).
Because of TrackID. Even Samsung's alternative sucks compared to it.

Well, that's mostly it.
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 11:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I started loving SE with T68i, that time even their then-flagship 7650 does not have theme support but that little phone (T68i) has!

I prefer SEs over nokia in imaging as well, Nokia Post processing is worse than SE's (always over saturated colours, N-R and sharpening ruins details even with their almighty N82- just take a look at the Touch HD review where they have compared it to N82), SE's colours are better too (with the exception of K850 of course)

I also prefer SE's UI, just take a look at idou, the current software still uses nokia's S60 5th UI but has better icon pack and a much better multimedia manager.

Everything else is the same as with night Blade's
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 11:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-03-02 10:42:12, ranzon wrote:


So why get an expensive SE when most nokias do more for mostly a lower price?
[ This Message was edited by: ranzon on 2009-03-02 09:44 ]



?????
it nearly always the opposite man. (just take a look what nokias new flagships costs when they comes)
Nokia have very few beautiful phones. one is 8800, (it surely have awesome buildquality and great design & features)...this I WANT
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
-----------------------------
(SE wins with their design, build quality, battery, UI, camera features/quality)
when Nokia make this kind of phones, i might switch
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-02 15:35 ]
aquared29
G900 Brown
Joined: Dec 07, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 12:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
nokia are lot of imitation,
Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others All we need now is a little patience
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 12:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The UI.
se_love
K800 Brown
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 13:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
UI is the downside and design. I cant take anymore of their shit.
blerk
T100
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 13:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The UI here too. But their service is far above SE's. Just look at the amount of firmware updates they keep pushing out. And those are not just some bug fixes, they introduce NEW features for older phones.

Much unlike SE who doesn't seem to care about fixing bugs let alone introduce new features for phones not even on the martket for 6 months. Most SE models don't get much if any updates at all.

A phone designed by SE with the service and update levels of Nokia would be great!
A To Z Feedback: [+18] - [-0]
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 21:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Whilst i prefer the SE interface its definately not fast.
SloopJohnB
K750
Joined: Oct 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: the blue planet
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 21:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
UI is īprettierī and perhaps more straighforward but it is totally based on nokiaīs UI. didnīt do much more than changing the icons and adding a few different commands here and there.
Brightspark
S500 Green
Joined: Aug 19, 2007
Posts: 326
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 22:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-03-02 11:17:47, NightBlade wrote:
Because of the design. Nokia sucks at the design part. Their phones just look so goddamn boring.
Because of the UI. SE's is the best interface I've ever had the pleasure of using. Period. It's fast. It's straightforward. It's intuitive. It has flashy animations (important!).
Because of TrackID. Even Samsung's alternative sucks compared to it.

Well, that's mostly it.


hold on, are you saying that SE has anything whatsoever to offer in the design department apart from their infamous ugly, boring, copy and paste designs? at least nokia vary their designs to a much greater degree.

as for the UI, what is the point of having a UI that is flashy when the software is so unreliable as to make many SE phones unusable and impractical. when 'god' was giving out practicality, you stayed behind to watch the fireworks.
hgautam
Sony Xperia X Performance
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 22:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-03-02 22:20:24, Brightspark wrote:
at least nokia vary their designs to a much greater degree.


Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.....
Paul_C
W890 Brown
Joined: Dec 03, 2003
Posts: 249
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 22:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I choose SE over Nokia because SE might break down and need repairing, Nokia WILL break down and need repairing often!
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 22:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well the repairing thing is completely not true
I will choose SE over Nokia for 3 important things
Camera functions(best pic,face/smile detection etc.), specs,interface etc
INTERFACE
and beautifull displays
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2009-03-02 22:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-03-02 22:20:24, Brightspark wrote:
hold on, are you saying that SE has anything whatsoever to offer in the design department apart from their infamous ugly, boring, copy and paste designs?

I find all of their designs fantastic. And I, apparently unlike many others, do no seem to detect any obtrusive similarities between the designs of different handsets. Rather, I see a certain deign logic they seem to incorporate in every phone and I like it.
at least nokia vary their designs to a much greater degree.

Yeah right, AS IF.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
123 ... 111213  Next
Goto page:
Unlock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic