| Author |
G900 Another disappoinment? G900vsN82vsSamsung Soul |
makbil
Joined: Oct 26, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Istanbul
PM |
SE still has the leverage of touch screen. I might even be persuaded to consider something like X1 but if it shows up with Symbian instead of WM.
P990i: A mistake, a curse and a disgrace  So I lowered my expectations and settled for a P1i. I couldn't keep my expectations so low for a long time so now I have an HTC Touch HD |
|
|
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
On 2008-04-15 19:24:43, hgautam wrote:
On 2008-04-15 12:54:40, ares wrote:
No matter what SE haters and doubters say, SE have 2 great products in hands, and this is confirmed by everyone that has been fortunate to test those phones
Having used G700 and G900, I can definitely confirm this too...
End of the story... 
The red G900 is really tempting for me also... I just hope the final version G900 will have a better camera...
regarding the camera..... do not take the M-R samples too seriuosly..
their unit had a thick layer of grease on the lens (or a defective sensor)
that's tooo obvious!!!
you can check here: (not much... only 2 full-size samples)
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_g900-review-221p3.php
i think it has a very good camera for a high-mid end!!! |
Keiki
Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 160
From: Valhalla
PM |
Yep, ive tested it on my k850 when the lens full of my fingerprint, it should produce the same result 
Full of my fingerprint grease
When had it cleaned up
[ This Message was edited by: Keiki on 2008-04-16 12:01 ] |
darknoob
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
there are 3 samples photos G900 vs N82 in smape:
http://smape.com/articles/sma[....]/smape_rating-04_08_press.html
|
EddieAdams
Joined: Nov 12, 2007
Posts: 251
From: L.I., New York
PM |
On 2008-04-15 03:43:24, technical-expert wrote:
Lately im seeing lot of sample pic of c902 and g900 both seems to below average in taking Pictures.Just visit the link a comparison between G900/N82/
Samsung u900.I see G900 was way below expectation..I find lately SE is doing very poorly in camera department.
http://www.mobile-review.com/rev/sonyericsson-g900.shtml
Scroll down to see sample pics, the review is in russian
[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-04-15 03:22 ]
This just reinforces my thread http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=168485
Hello, Exactly!-Eddie Adams a.k.a. Dirk Diggler a.k.a. Brock Landers. Boogie Nights. |
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
@eddieadams
indeed everyone will enjoy a CCD sensor in their camphones.... but the M-R samples are by no means the real picture quality of the G900i... (dirty lens or faulty sensor) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
G900 and c702 will never (ever) get the same pic quality as k850. they have a smaller(weeker) camera module
thats a fact. (no software in the world can change that). BUT the pic quality can off course become better by a more optimized cam driver.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-18 13:08 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-18 14:06:37, plankgatan wrote:
G900 and c702 will never (ever) get the same pic quality as k850. they have a smaller(weeker) camera module
thats a fact.
What is your source for this? Difficult to make a weaker camera module than the one in the K850, considering the very small sensor used (1/2.8").
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i read it on some internet page couple a weeks ago, im trying to find it right now.
|
crossmatched
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
|
let's just wait for the final commercial versions to appear. then we judge c702 and g900
both are christening models so imo they won't disappoint us.
lets not ask too much from g900. its not a cybershot handset. its focus is not mainly on imaging
www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com
we are all works under progress |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-18 14:53:21, plankgatan wrote:
i read it on some internet page couple a weeks ago, im trying to find it right now.
Let us know when you find the source. If you don't then we would have to assume that you are just stating your opinion again and that you're wrong as usual . . . 
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2008-04-18 14:06:37, plankgatan wrote:
G900 and c702 will never (ever) get the same pic quality as k850. they have a smaller(weeker) camera module
thats a fact. (no software in the world can change that). BUT the pic quality can off course become better by a more optimized cam driver.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-18 13:08 ]
lets put it into this: if a superslim camera phone integrated with a smaller sensor like G900/C902 will not get the same quality pictures K850 delivers, then what did Samsung Sould did over the N95?
~19 years at Esato |
XGlite015
Joined: Dec 01, 2007
Posts: 14
PM |
I think G700 produces better picture quality than G900's camera despite the lack of autofocus, the G700 has better color reproduction and sharper images(based on gsmarena and m-r G700 pic samples). |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
SE are shit at imaging now its a fact.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-15 20:02
So I lowered my expectations and settled for a P1i. I couldn't keep my expectations so low for a long time so now I have an HTC Touch HD 
