| Author |
unhappy K850 buyer |
SaLiH
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
|
@plankgatan
That's exactly what I mean, It's not easy to get that sharp photo with any phone, but the point is that you can't get it with every camera phone no matter how hard you try. Your macro photos look great, but I think that everyone is ''fighting'' with you over K850i camera quality, because they're disappointed that it's not that easy P&S camera they've expected.
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus |
|
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-11-15 12:35:49, plankgatan wrote:
@salih...that pic is awesome, BUT ive seen many more i-mobile macro pictures (on the web) who dosent have the same sharpness....(but yes, that pic "glow"  ....sometimes you get this "lucky" shoot (if you understand what i mean)
A lot of people seem to have exactly the same opinion about the K850. Comparing the K850 and the i-mobile 902 I would say that the K850 is easier to operate, but if you put both of these in the hands of a photographer then see which one he/she would choose... (probably the i-mobile if he/she wants to take good staged (composed) photos but the K850 for "action" shots).
About that macro shot: I got it on the second attempt. My first attempts a few months ago after buying this camera phone were miserable failures. And this one is not handheld. I had to use my new mini-tripod.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
if you want a P & S (point and shoot camera) buy a w810, w800 or a k750..............k800, k810, k850 demands more "skill"/work....(or plain luck...he he he
the negative with k750, w800, w810, is lack of real flash and some other important camera-features........
(also remember that this 3 phones produce crappy low light, indoor pictures.....k850 have a awesome allround camera.....see you
_________________
I  k850i,  w810i &  T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-11-15 12:04 ] |
SilveR.
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
As you guys said, depends who is handle the camera, that's still the biggest question..
2 different people takes totaly different shot and quality. That's it..
--------------------- |
tomjsmith000
Joined: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 116
From: Bristol, England
PM |
I thought Id be loyal to SE after being ecstatic with my K800 but I but the K850i and it just doesn't compare.
I've been trying to swap for an N95 in the phone shop but they won't do it! So, I'm getting a replacement next week and I plan on selling it or trading for an N95.
I just generally dislike the phone now so I'm looking for faults. |
PowerLee
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 344
PM |
On 2007-11-15 12:58:18, plankgatan wrote:
if you want a P & S (point and shoot camera) buy a w810, w800 or a k750..............k800, k810, k850 demands more "skill"/work....(or plain luck...he he he
the negative with k750, w800, w810, is lack of real flash and some other important camera-features........
(also remember that this 3 phones produce crappy low light, indoor pictures.....k850 have a awesome allround camera.....see you
_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-11-15 12:04 ]
MXE - 60 Xenon flash add on is less then £10 for the K750 / W800
Never took a crappy low light or indoor picture with my K750, took a slightly better picture of my mates new car at night using just the led light against his K800 with the xenon flash ( that upset him ) for a 2 mp camera phone K750 takes brilliant pictures.
Its not difficult for the average K750 / W800 owner to work out when to use macro, night mode or use the led light or even the add on MXE - 60 flash if they have one
The K850 is just the latest line in camera phone disappointments from the once great Sony Ericsson.
Ive never been impressed with the K800 or the K810 & now the K850 has come along & its just like the previous two models, over hyped, im sticking with my K750.
[ This Message was edited by: PowerLee on 2007-11-15 15:44 ] |
SaLiH
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
|
@PowerLee
Well Said PowerLee, In my case I might be going back to K750i or W810i! 
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus |
Dogmann
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: London England
PM |
@plankgatan
You see the problem is you ram your opinions down every ones throats the whole time and suggest no one but you with your superior skills and knowledge knows what they are doing. The whole point of a Camera phone is point and shoot if you want or need to alter settings and set a shot up you might of well of got a dedicated Camera that will do the job far better. What ever you say the point of a camera phone is point and shoot to capture the moment, not ten minutes later after the moment has passed but your device is now ready.
I would like to know exactly how many pictures you discard before you are happy to show one here? and also just how long you spend before taking each shot? Shame what ever you answer is there is no way of knowing if you would be telling the truth or not and personally i would find it hard to believe anything you say.
It will be interesting to see just how good the N82 Camera smart phone is when compared to the K850.
Marc
_________________
Nokia N95 8GB, SU-8W, Fring, Vox
Nokia E61, 2gb Sandisk, For sale
Honoured to have won BEST DEBATER
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-11-16 09:22 ] |
crossmatched
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
|
i can't wait for an n82 vs k850 cam shot comparison. will carl zeiss save the day or will cybershot software prevail?
www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com
we are all works under progress |
|
|
Posted: 2007-11-15 12:45
