| Author |
Has any one got a 7210 here |
aaronkhoo
Joined: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 25
From: Singapore
PM, WWW
|
Super G: Sorry, I have other things to do than reading your answers to other posters... So you did upgrade your phone. I acknowledge that. Then be consistent with your own words...
what you've said makes a whole lot of sense, now if only if were true. re-read my post. half of it was directed at you.
--- although i'd like to be able to proudly claim that i have never required a flash on my phone's firmware, unfortunately that is no longer so. if only i didn't want to upgrade my T68m to a T68i. darn. ---
that was written in my reply to you, many posts ago.
and i'm supposed to be consistent with my words?! when did i say that my phone's *never* needed a re-flash?
Super G: A fat lot of good! Really impressive
and your 'parlez-vous francias' is something the whole world should be proud of? i can't see what learning French has done for you. certainly hasn't made you any more knowledgable.
Super G: Please, don't be sorry if you don't mean it!
see here, this is getting ridiculous. when i reply directly to you, you pay no attention, but when i'm speaking to everyone else, you butt in and make noise. why don't you go and do your 'other things'?
[ This Message was edited by: aaronkhoo on 2002-11-14 01:38 ] |
|
|
jeRrRKKKK
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Posts: 39
PM |
Hey i bought a 7650 and i can tell you 4 megs is way not enough memory for a phone let alone .5 megs the even t68 has 1 meg i'd rather get a 7650 than a 7210 tt looks better but lacks so much functionalsty
This post was posted from a Nokia 7650 |
Raven
Joined: Jul 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
C'mon guys, this discussion is getting way too personal IMO.... Can't we try to keep these discussions on a somewhat intelligent/civilized level? This is just getting way out of hand, and not to mention TOPIC!
This post was posted from a Nokia 7650 |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
@Raven
I agree with you. This discussion has crossed the line. I think it's ok to discuss phones, and I like discussions. But when they turn into personal wars, it's not intresting anymore at least not for me. |
[MDS]
Joined: Oct 09, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: U.S.A.
PM, WWW
|
second that....
www.mythstudios.com |
Deltayoda
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Los Angeles, California
PM |
Lets get all the good points of both the Nokia phones and  phones and create a new company called SENOK! |
gareb
Joined: Sep 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Still like T-68i better than the Nokia 7210.
Georgia aint no paradise. But a place I call home. |
DUSK5150
Joined: Mar 03, 2003
Posts: 22
PM |
Dis ain't about cars. Anyway, I gotta give this guy points for knowin' his stuff and standing his ground. He makes some cogent arguments. I right now own both a T68i and a T300 and am deciding which one to sell. Tiraids like this one just might help me make up my mind... hmmm.... |
erikakerlund
Joined: Jan 08, 2003
Posts: 47
From: Sweden
PM |
I appreciate you discussing Nokia and Ericsson here but for those who have an and cheers for Nokia can get the f**k out of here. Here we discuss ERiCSSON and nothing else! If fyou want to cheer for Nokia do that on a Nokia forum. // an SE fan!
and one thing more. The T68 and T68i has been out for more than 1 YEAR now! and when did the *ridiculous* 7210 show up hu?
[ This Message was edited by: erikakerlund on 2003-03-04 09:57 ]
[ This Message was edited by: erikakerlund on 2003-03-04 10:00 ] |
dark_knight_r3turns
Joined: Feb 13, 2003
Posts: 186
From: BATCAVE
PM, WWW
|
@swazi...I had one and to my experience/opinion, its a bit hard to press the buttons coz its both too far apart and too close together. Its IR is not even compatible w/ the 7650 if you want to transfer tones on the go. I didnt quite like. I guess it would be better if you check out 6100 or 5100. Better 5100 coz its shock, dust and water resistant. It even has a calorie counter. Ü Or wait for the 6800 and N-gage.
This message was posted from a P800 |
Rand
Joined: Dec 01, 2002
Posts: 1
PM |
I liked the functionality in my old T68 (flashed to i), but I have to admit that many of the basic function (reception, sound) were lacking. My gf also has one and she seems to have gotten a better phone than I had because often I couldn't get a signal while hers was working just fine.
I switched to the 7210 and while there things I missed about the T68 (picture phone book, better mms features, animation in sms), the Nokia seems to be a much-better phone.
Reception-wise, there's no contest. Now the 7210 even bests the gf's phone. SMS is soooo much better and quicker. The colours are brighter and more vivid (especially with a transparent logo), the polyphonic rocks (especially when you can assign tunes to sms now). It looks good with the black case, there's a cheap but dependable camera option that's at least as good as the 68, if not better.
I didn't think I'd like the Speakerphone function, but I use it more and more. And for the FM radio, I usually beam mp3s from my iPod so I can listen to tunes and take calls.
Nokia's not for everyone, but the 7210 is a good (tri-band) phone that sacrifices some of the gadget-ness of the 68 for more-dependable quality and reliability.
That said, I have looked at the p800 and some of the other phones coming in the market. Basically, the best is still to come no matter what platform/maker you choose. Life is good.
[ This Message was edited by: Rand on 2003-03-06 10:51 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2002-11-14 02:35
