Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Tips and tricks > Nokia 3250 vs W850

Author Nokia 3250 vs W850
Mandu36love
T68 gold
Joined: Dec 12, 2006
Posts: 19
From: INDIA
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-18 07:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
nokia nokia nokia nokia all bricks old man.their looks even masons in my town often mistakes nokia as bricks.so lazy phones please dont compare w850i with those bricks.ericsson has more cool has easy phone operating system.while opening files in nokia phones it says (please wait) suck it dam phone.but i want to say to se developers and se fans that nokia 6600 and 7610 ranging around 10000 do support symbian.i must say se de.its our minus point.
Supa_Fly
X1 Silver
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-18 09:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-12-18 07:58:45, Mandu36love wrote:
nokia nokia nokia nokia all bricks old man.their looks even masons in my town often mistakes nokia as bricks.



What? You obviously havent been in touch with the times lately have you.

The Nokia N75 & 6290 are both slightly thicker and I mean slightly - their thinner than the W810 - than the Moto Razr. Both pack 2MP camera with flash yet no Auto Focus that I've confirmed (theres that damn marketing decision again). And the menu's are going to be fast. Not as fast as prototype N95's which is as fast for ANY function (save the Maps but thats over GPS & internal maps in memory so this should be forgiven upon initial loading) just like your dumbed SE phones (P990/M600's arent dumb; yet their going to be faster than the P990).

I hear all kinds of complaints about brick styling and slow OS from ppl that havent used or seen out-in-the-wild videos of recent phones due to ship imminently or less than 2 months out. At least compare current phones with current.

> If you havent noticed SE's phones are taking longer to boot up lately. SE W810 which I own and use as my primary and now only phone for the past 4 months takes 20-26 seconds to load. Newer firmware for Nokia N93 users have posted here in Esato getting the same times!

> I'm love the W810 and its at the pinnicle of SE's excellence save to the K790/800 which I havent got to use just yet; but Nokia is making HUGE strides lately. SE better abandan THIN styling and go for function, performance & features or they'll begin to loose sales!
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ... K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i).
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-18 09:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
We are here to compare, not to blame or judge and the brick phrase is annoying

This message was posted from a R520m
Supa_Fly
X1 Silver
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-18 10:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Yeah I may have gone too far there but my post is STILL valid as users are comparing older phones from Nokia to recent phones.

which leads me to a another post elswhere from another quote.

Cheers mates.
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ... K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i).
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-18 10:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@prom it was for @mandu
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
miguel19
K750
Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Posts: 130
PM
Posted: 2006-12-28 07:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think 3250 is the loudest phone in Nokia.
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-28 08:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Nokia symbians are generally loud and got really good vibra

This message was posted from a 6233
korbindallis
T39 black
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2006-12-28 08:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
If your making your decision on price then choose the 3250 its cheaper if price is not a problem then i say go for the w850i better screen better accessories and of the two its the newer model.

This message was posted from a K790i
Tsepz_GP
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM
Posted: 2006-12-28 08:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Go for the W850 its got 3G,Flash Themes, its a very fun phone, and its not big and bulky lyk the 3250

This message was posted from a W900i
miguel19
K750
Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Posts: 130
PM
Posted: 2006-12-28 19:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
W850 is better..
xpx
T68i
Joined: May 29, 2004
Posts: 79
From: canada
PM
Posted: 2006-12-28 20:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-12-18 09:17:57, Prom1 wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-12-18 07:58:45, Mandu36love wrote:
nokia nokia nokia nokia all bricks old man.their looks even masons in my town often mistakes nokia as bricks.



What? You obviously havent been in touch with the times lately have you.

The Nokia N75 & 6290 are both slightly thicker and I mean slightly - their thinner than the W810 - than the Moto Razr. Both pack 2MP camera with flash yet no Auto Focus that I've confirmed (theres that damn marketing decision again). And the menu's are going to be fast. Not as fast as prototype N95's which is as fast for ANY function (save the Maps but thats over GPS & internal maps in memory so this should be forgiven upon initial loading) just like your dumbed SE phones (P990/M600's arent dumb; yet their going to be faster than the P990).

I hear all kinds of complaints about brick styling and slow OS from ppl that havent used or seen out-in-the-wild videos of recent phones due to ship imminently or less than 2 months out. At least compare current phones with current.

> If you havent noticed SE's phones are taking longer to boot up lately. SE W810 which I own and use as my primary and now only phone for the past 4 months takes 20-26 seconds to load. Newer firmware for Nokia N93 users have posted here in Esato getting the same times!

> I'm love the W810 and its at the pinnicle of SE's excellence save to the K790/800 which I havent got to use just yet; but Nokia is making HUGE strides lately. SE better abandan THIN styling and go for function, performance & features or they'll begin to loose sales!





prom most the member who keep replying like that are bunch of 14-15 years old kids. so dont expect any good comment from them. if not then its those hardcore norrowminded FANS.
eat my short!
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-12-28 21:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Lets face the truth. If it comes to the "wow" factor, nokia is way ahead

This message was posted from a 6233
fullthrottle
W660 Black
Joined: Feb 09, 2007
Posts: 43
From: Garden City!! Now Polluted
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-03-25 16:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
NOkia 3250 ROX
Girls are like domain names, the ones I like are already taken..

there isn't only a hand full of chicks but a land full of 'm
mulsim_soldi
W810 black
Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 43
PM
Posted: 2007-04-10 16:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
w850 anytime :
1- better screen
2- better sound through headphones
3-better mp3 player
4-better camera
Etc..

and for those who says that being symbian is adv. why ?? i dont c it better at all
aatuif
R520
Joined: Sep 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: KASHMIR
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-04-10 16:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Ya. Go for W850.

@... don't at all call nokia, bricks... I can't digest it...
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi