| Author |
Camera Comparison: Nokia N90 vs Sony Ericsson W800i |
gelfen
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM |
the colour is more vibrant because the n90 sacrifices accurate colour rendition by artificially saturating the blue-green end of the spectrum. this makes the image look brighter but less realistic. fuji film used to do that all the time compared with kodak because it appealed more to asian markets.
|
|
|
B.J.
Joined: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 169
From: place to be, Manila.
PM |
and hu doesn't know the 6270. 6280 etc... they all have 2mpix cam... another strategy for nokia to block up they overrated n series... wonder wat happened to that n91? ny feed backs guys? hu owns one?
Hi I'm Brye. A friend of the United States of America. An enemy of the Underground Man Looking Alien Creatures. |
Enricos
Joined: Oct 07, 2005
Posts: 1
PM |
Hy guys,
Look at the link and make your conclusion,more pictures are comming,Centrino am i on a Belgium forum,the pictures are taken on a dark room,whit flasch and macro.
http://www.vergelijking.be/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4707
[ This Message was edited by: Enricos on 2005-10-07 12:53 ] |
o44wen
Joined: Dec 11, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Coleraine (NI) and Dundee
PM, WWW
|
check this site out for picture comparison.
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]onyericsson_w800-review-46.php
Sony Ericsson pictures are so much better
|
|
|
Posted: 2005-08-18 07:19
