| Author |
Another Samsung 5mp Phone-G800 |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
so no black version dya know? 
An "Apple" a day keeps the Doctor at Bay! |
|
|
GSM Helpdesk
Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Posts: 11
PM, WWW
|
Not for now at least.... |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
darm'it 
An "Apple" a day keeps the Doctor at Bay! |
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-13 00:33:03, SaLiH wrote:
I think this phone will be perfect if they put a CCD camera in it.
Why CCD? Whats wrong with CMOS? CMOS pickups are smaller, use less power and are as good as CCD. The current range of Canon Digital SLR's, which are among the best out there use CMOS.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-08 12:23:22, jcwhite_uk wrote:
On 2007-09-13 00:33:03, SaLiH wrote:
I think this phone will be perfect if they put a CCD camera in it.
Why CCD? Whats wrong with CMOS? CMOS pickups are smaller, use less power and are as good as CCD. The current range of Canon Digital SLR's, which are among the best out there use CMOS.
You're comparing DSLRs with camera phones?
|
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
I am not really comparing DSLR's with camera phones just asking why he needs it to have CCD when CMOS is as good. The canon dslr was just an example of you dont need CCD.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Go back and read the how much more expensive is a CCD sensor in a cell phone ? thread again. I saw you also posted there:
On 2007-08-28 17:44:27, jcwhite_uk wrote:
Modern CMOS sensors are supposed to be nearly as good as CCD now. CMOS is cheaper and also uses less power than CCD.
Note that highlighted part. You posted that less than two months ago. Do you mean that today CMOS is equal to CCD - not just "nearly as good"?
From CCD vs. CMOS:
CMOS cameras may require fewer components and less power, but they still generally require companion chips to optimize image quality, increasing cost and reducing the advantage they gain from lower power consumption. CCD devices are less complex than CMOS, so they cost less to design.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-08 13:24 ] |
amawanqa
Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Hornchurch UK & East London SA
PM |
The G800 now officially launched:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsu[....]its_it_officially-news-343.php
He who laughs last... thinks slowest.
Nokia 5800, Sony Ericsson P1i, Nokia 7600. |
amorphus
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 41
From: Bulgaria
PM |
On 2007-07-25 22:39:00, ajeetpv wrote:
Is it possible on a phone?? See the 5.6-17.4mm focal length.
[ This Message was edited by: ajeetpv on 2007-07-25 21:41 ]
In these new (official?) photos focal length dimensions, as i see, are AF 3.8/4.75 mm.
In oldest pictures - 5.6-17.4mm focal length. See for example the fitst post of this topic or this review:
http://mobil.idnes.cz/prichaz[....]A071013_213733_mob_samsung_ada
Where the truth lies?:)
Great phone IMHO.
|
Sobo
Joined: May 28, 2007
Posts: 88
PM |
Very beautiful phone with nice specs
I think it's the first phone from Samsung that I like  |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Optical inner zoon?
|
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
and look at the ISO sensitivity for crying out loud... 
and Face Detection capabilities
and fro where i see it, it looks like a Finepix look alike. or coolpix...
this has got to perform good, and not be called as a loud mouth...
thats why the phone is that thick... to make room for the barrel..
this i got to see. worth the wait....
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: rockygali on 2007-10-23 10:26 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2007-10-08 14:12:05, jcwhite_uk wrote:
I am not really comparing DSLR's with camera phones just asking why he needs it to have CCD when CMOS is as good. The canon dslr was just an example of you dont need CCD.
Hey mate, Canon CMOS sensors are way larger than standard CCD sensors that's why it's better.
~19 years at Esato |
aldrinus
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM |
after my last SE unit, the K700i, i switched to Samsung two years ago, first with the clam E730 and the last one, the slider D600. what amazes me with their units is their camera capabilities and their screens. although without AF, still these two models produce print-quality photos (E730: 1.3mp, D600: 2.0mp)... and now comes the G800!
G800 simply blows me away (at the moment). just look at those product specs! since i have the W810 now for my music and (for now) immediate photography needs, i am now torn in between the K850 and this unit... at the moment, i guess i need to see sample photos taken by the G800 first if they more or less equal or even surpass those taken by plank's K850 
yeah baby, Walkman rocks!
|
amawanqa
Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Hornchurch UK & East London SA
PM |
Yeah, I'm pretty keen to see pics taken with this new G800.
He who laughs last... thinks slowest.
Nokia 5800, Sony Ericsson P1i, Nokia 7600. |
|
|
Posted: 2007-09-17 23:43
