Author |
) SE are forcing us to go else where. ( |
Deltayoda Joined: Mar 03, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Los Angeles, California PM |
Well, that's reasonable enough. They are taking way too long for the P800 to be released, hopefully it will be released this year (By this month) as promised, not next year. |
|
pachy Joined: Nov 05, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
They brought the t68i out early before it was finnished (T68m was obviously a Sony & Ericsson joint venture) then gave us the finnished software later ( the "i" upgrade) so why could`nt they have done the same with the p800. ...ps. please people who think that the t68m was an ericsson only product don`t bother trying to convince me otherwise it`s your own little problem not mine. |
moldy Joined: Sep 11, 2002 Posts: 28 From: England PM, WWW
|
It hardly seems worth arguing with Deltayoda as he is clearly insane. You do realise though that's it's 1 to 2 years of typical day to day use on that particular phone right?
It's irrelevant what the "date of manufacture" is as the phone hasn't been in use for that time. As sprinkles noted, it's been sitting on a shelf. Don't insult my intelligence by insinuating that I was stating that hardware components sitting on a shelf degrade.
btw, it's not a theory, it's working practice. I have a good friend who designs screens for Sony-Ericsson and he designs them with that kind of life span.
*sigh*
- moldy
"I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows." - Bart Simpson |
|