| Author |
Cameraphone Perv caught on CCTV |
upper
Joined: Apr 17, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-01-20 18:31:49, batesie wrote:
upper. i agree that these perverts need to be punished.
but i dont agree that everyones freedoms should be affected by the minority which cant control there desires.
ok, a few people steal mobile phones. does this mean none of us should not be alowed to have mobile phones, thus take away our freedom???
sorry but your point of view is pathetic.
|
|
lol buts buts, no buts, kidding. 
well i think its all about being safe, and its not affecting no ones freedom depending how you look at it,there is a barrier where we cannot as human pass, like example batesie, you tell me, where does it stop? i mean a 100 yr ago people would of been shocked to see how women dresses up today, (present day), ok 1950 they started showing cleavage and from there on it continued in the 1970's when they started wearing short skirts, so tell me batesie when is this going to stop? i mean aint there noo limits no more? i mean does this freedom of yours mean dressing how ever you want? please dont tell me that its ok to wear g string on a public high streets, and trust me i think thats just around the corner, and now we are in 2000's where jodie marsh wore a belt over her breasts lol, obviously she thinks its normal because she was born in a time where people though this was natural and ok, but if she was born in 1900 i dont think she would of done that bcoz she would of been born in a yr where people didnt though it was normal and so on. but i get a feeling where you do not want it to stop lol  .
and about mobile phones, lol please dont compare mobile phones with a hot chick lol . anyways being robbed of a phone is different of being RAPED, women get scard for life from being raped, and are even scared to leave there own homes, there lives are totally changed, i would prefer if my wifes mobile phone was 100 times knicked than anythink happening to my wife, so mobile and rape dont share the same category. the person who comits these crimes is called a theif not a rapists. and by the way our goverment even tell us on comercials that not to use your phone were alot of people can see it, a caption where it says DONT ADVERTISE YOUR MOBILE PHONE just like a woman shouldnt advertise her body lol 
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
NEW WORLD ORDER: http://www.prisonplanet.net http://www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-01-20 18:06 ] | |
|
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-01-20 18:37:44, joebmc wrote:
A lot of women like to wear short skirts and revelling tops, why? Maybe because they feel attractive in them!
Would you like to dress in baggy cloths and look in the mirror and feel unattractive or wear cloths that you think you look good looking in?
|
|
Absolutely i completely agree....if i was a women i would'nt like to parade around in a baggy top and baggy bottoms...I just feel sorry for women who have to dress in a certain way just so that they can feel safe and not have pervs look at them.
[addsig] |
Simon N
Joined: Dec 02, 2005
Posts: 71
From: Nottingham UK
PM |
What a sad sad person this dude is. He could have just joined a porn site and viewed such things if he was that way inclined. I bet the image quality and darkness made the vids near useless anyway.
Thankfully another perv locked up. However when they say Minor what age is that under? How old was she? Only ask as in UK 16 and under is a minor in canada 14 and under so it varies a great deal. If girl was 17 then am guessing other than invasion of privacy the guy would not get treated as harsh in uk.
Are we (as a race) too uptight or not harsh enough?
I personally think there should be a mobile/cell phone operators license. Its free and easy to obtain but should you get caught doing something like this you get your license revoked and are unable to have a mobile phone for x amount of years. |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-01-22 12:50:19, Simon N wrote:
What a sad sad person this dude is. He could have just joined a porn site and viewed such things if he was that way inclined. I bet the image quality and darkness made the vids near useless anyway.
Thankfully another perv locked up. However when they say Minor what age is that under? How old was she? Only ask as in UK 16 and under is a minor in canada 14 and under so it varies a great deal. If girl was 17 then am guessing other than invasion of privacy the guy would not get treated as harsh in uk.
Are we (as a race) too uptight or not harsh enough?
I personally think there should be a mobile/cell phone operators license. Its free and easy to obtain but should you get caught doing something like this you get your license revoked and are unable to have a mobile phone for x amount of years.
|
|
That's not a bad idea. They could have one to make emergency calls only, or a "work licence" for day time only 
|
Simon N
Joined: Dec 02, 2005
Posts: 71
From: Nottingham UK
PM |
Nope a single licence...abuse it and lose it.
You dont get second chances with driving licences.
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
well it depends. Any picture of a minor is pretty serious but a picture of a 17 year old girl at the beach, not so clear cut. Loss of phone privileges for life? Bit harsh in my view. Depends on the seriousness of the offence.
Not supporting these wankers or anything, but to say they lose all right to use a mobile phone for ever for one transgression, regardless of the severity? By saying that you are saying that such a person is never capable of existing in society and should be jailed for life to protect the innocent. Currently society still tries to rehabilitate criminals, not just put them inside and throw away the key.
Christ, even people who commit murder get out in several years - are you saying they should never be able to own a car if they killed someone with a vehicle? Or never allowed to handle a knife ever again if they killed with a knife? Stopping a killer from using a knife is hardly going to prevent them from killing again. If you stop a pedophile from using a phone camera they'll use a normal one, or resort to some other means of satisfying their craving (god forbid). Banning them from using a camera for life is only useful if the individual has shown that they are habitual - such as a repeat offender drunk driver who eventually, after many chances, loses their drivers licence for good. However many one or two time offenders learn a lesson and stop drink driving. If you were to take the licence off these people straight up they would learn nothing and go straight back to drink driving, licenced or not. In other words by imposing a lifetime ban, you remove the deterent which encourages them not to drink drive (if they don't have a licence to lose they won't try to keep it by not drink driving).
|
methylated_spirit
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM |
I've been reading these big long self-righteous posts and all i can say is 
Basically anyone caught doing it should be punished, and thats whats happened.
Hello, Scroto!
U.G.L.Y. You ain't got no alibi, you ugly! | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2006-01-20 18:58
