| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
great sharpness...great camera...great camera driver....great weather...great life 
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/6156/dsc00455bb5.jpg
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/2563/dsc00451vr1.jpg
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/8066/dsc00456bo3.jpg
http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/8748/dsc00440gt6.jpg
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 17:18 ] |
|
|
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
Plank what is your firmware dude. I had 37 and the pic's were awful. I took a pic of me and my wife. With the flash and the results were really bad. I'll post it when i get home. Last night i changed my firmware to t mobile international's 38 on davinci's website. I'm hoping i'll get better results now. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Those pics are quite pixilated plank. And whats with the purple fringing?
|
larry 68
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Those pics arent very good and horrible in full size. No where near the quality that Plank normally posts. |
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
yeah just looking at those on a screen and they look just like my k850s pics, the phone has a real hard time with fringing and distinguishing details. I hate this phone to be honest.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
it dosent mater that much, think the quality is ok for a cell phone, i just showed them because i thought they was ok... more important is that this camera with a better driver, can produce high quality pics...thats whats depends for me.
its hard to produce 100% quality-pics all time..its just a cell phone.
(if every pics became like this, you didnt need a real camera..he he)
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8600/dsc00394hk7.jpg
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 21:18 ] |
larry 68
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
DonJuan
You post some really nice pics, I enjoy seeing something a bit different and what a place to do it in, if you dont like the quality of your K850i you could always swop for mine, I can only get about 5% decent shots. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-30 22:11:29, plankgatan wrote:
it dosent mater that much, think the quality is ok for a cell phone, i just showed them because i thought they was ok... more important is that this camera with a better driver, can produce high quality pics...thats whats depends for me.
its hard to produce 100% quality-pics all time..its just a cell phone.
(if every pics became like this, you didnt need a real camera..he he)
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8600/dsc00394hk7.jpg
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 21:18 ]
No its not. N95/N95 8gb/N82/Viewty and even G600 produce better pics in those conditions. Overall quite dissapointing from SE.
|
franique
Joined: Dec 13, 2007
Posts: 24
From: Malaysia = Ukraine
PM, WWW
|
+taken in Cordova, Spain+ [br]
+Alhambra and Generalife, Spain+[br]
+Gaudi, Spain+
[ This Message was edited by: franique on 2008-01-30 21:37 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
@bavlondon... whatever....you dont know what you talking about..do you realy think a cell phone can produce much better quality then this...im not some rookie who sit here and praise some k850 pics becuase i like ..i praised this pics because i know there is no cell phone who manage it much better...(i had N82 for some days, so yes i know it have a good camera with a little stronger flash then k850...but overall, its not better then k850 right now)
G800...you must be kidding me...G800 is the worse 5 M.P phone i ever seen.
take a look at Flickr.com at some G800 pics, then you tell me:
ps.... here you have G800...its realy bad
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-30 21:36 ] |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Actually I said G600.
|
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
Plank what is your firmware dude. I had 37 and the pic's were awful. I took a pic of me and my wife. With the flash and the results were really bad. I'll post it when i get home. Last night i changed my firmware to t mobile international's 38 on davinci's website. I'm hoping i'll get better results now.
every k850 sucks mate, just some people edit pictures and then they looks better
its easy to edit photo on pc and then transfer them to phone and open it in photodj and save it, result will be normal exif, without data from PC program 
OnePlus 8 |
brewcaster
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 77
PM, WWW
|
ughhhh, no more no more no more. If you are here to look at photos from a k850, great. If you are here to post pictures of k850, great. If you are here to just criticize, than please leave. Plank, I really want to encourage you to stop responding to the internet ass-clowns. I am getting realllly tired of re-reading this tired argument over the quality of the camera. Plank, if you are confident, then don't respond to them. Let's just get back to looking at awesome photos taken with this (IN MY OPINION) awesome phone. |
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-01-30 22:45:38, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
its easy to edit photo on pc and then transfer them to phone and open it in photodj and save it, result will be normal exif, without data from PC program
You're wrong, PhotoDJ will remove EXIF completely. those pics look good cos they are ~12 times smaller than original!
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-30 22:27:17, franique wrote:
+taken in Cordova, Spain+ [br]
@fran - I really LIKE this shot ! Looks like a mini-coliseum that can be found in - Rome
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-30 18:11
