| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
On 2008-01-11 18:43:24, DonJuan wrote:
lol i use photoshop, is there a problem with photoshop?
its ok mate, but say that 
someone here in exif have photoshopc cs2 and he said that he doesnt used PS
pathetic
OnePlus 8 |
|
|
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Read through this thread http://www.esato.com/board/vi[....]c=161071&start=15#post2199389, and cut out your talk about anything else then k850 pics
..
Captured with 029 firmware 3 months ago. |
vegetaleb
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lebanon
PM |
Can someone post a video in 320*240 30fps in daylight please?
Prince Vegeta,prince of all sayans  Administrator in Dailymobile |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-01-11 20:20:16, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
On 2008-01-11 18:43:24, DonJuan wrote:
lol i use photoshop, is there a problem with photoshop?
its ok mate, but say that
someone here in exif have photoshopc cs2 and he said that he doesnt used PS
pathetic
hey dumass..... do you understand anything ????
its a BIG difference to shrink a picture then to change the whole picture !!!!!
you tell people that i change this pictures in Photo shop....it makes you a lier.
get a life, and leave me along.
this pictures (and many more) is 100% original...ok !!!!!
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-11 20:56 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i love this thread. especially the "nice" way, as member discuss the k850 pic quality... sad...
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
|
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-01-11 22:50:06, BobaFett wrote:
i love this thread. especially the "nice" way, as member discuss the k850 pic quality... sad...
Well i have read through this tread and i really can't say that it has been a bad tone until now actually. It has not been as the N95 vs K850 at all. Not close. |
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-11 21:17:26, vegetaleb wrote:
Can someone post a video in 320*240 30fps in daylight please?
Prince Saiyan, I think Plank did post videos inside this topic. You gotta dig.....think from page 20 onwards... |
kenoby
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 407
From: 404
PM |
@ plank, you have already proven some points before, so can you please stop respond to Vipera? He will not stop and we are all getting tired of both of you, whoever is right.
Exif data can be altered so do as you wish, resized or no. People already know that 5mpx is different size. |
ccsharry
Joined: Dec 06, 2007
Posts: 22
From: uk
PM, WWW
|
Don't you think the compression artifact is really bad? You never see clear sharp image since the artifact is everywhere... well, I'm a DSLR user so my expectation is high, but I'm disappointed with the so called 5 Mega Pixel. I think somehow they manage to fake a lower pixel sensor by masking the pixels with artifacts caused by the high compression rate... I have more photo taken by K850i in my flickr page... Click the image to get there
[ This Message was edited by: ccsharry on 2008-01-12 10:10 ]
[ This Message was edited by: ccsharry on 2008-01-12 11:49 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
hold on, don't expect too much, this is only CMOS 1/2.8" sensor
|
vegetaleb
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lebanon
PM |
If you complain about jpeg compression with the K850 you have seen nothing! the jpeg compression on the N95 is monstruous! it's like 30-40%
Prince Vegeta,prince of all sayans Administrator in Dailymobile |
ccsharry
Joined: Dec 06, 2007
Posts: 22
From: uk
PM, WWW
|
Shouldn't all 5 Mega Pixel Cameras perform very similar? If 5 Mega Pixel only tells the number of pixels on the sensor and does not reflect the performance of the sensor at all, I think there should be a new standard to weight the camera quality...
Is the camera processor too slow to cope with the low compression rate?! If the sensor is capable of doing better, why shouldn't there a setting for Maximum Quality. At the end of the day, if the photo with Maximum Quality is very large, people will choose a lower quality setting while this will still fulfill those who demand good quality photo... |
Fredricx
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 106
From: Sweden
PM |
"well, I'm a DSLR user so my expectation is high, but I'm disappointed with the so called 5 Mega Pixel. I think somehow they manage to fake a lower pixel sensor by masking the pixels with artifacts caused by the high compression rate..."
First of all, stop complaining !!
What did you expect when you bought the K850 ? That it would replace your 400D ??
The K850 is just a improvement of the K800/K810, a simpel party camera...
If you are an DSLR user you know that even the performance of a cheaper ordenary digital camera is quite bad, so what do you expect from the K850?
Im supprised that they sell any other cameras at all now when the K850 is out on the market ( if you see my irony )
Itīs a camera phone ppl !! Get a life !
|
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-01-12 10:59:16, ccsharry wrote:
Don't you think the compression artifact is really bad? You never see clear sharp image since the artifact is everywhere... well, I'm a DSLR user so my expectation is high, but I'm disappointed with the so called 5 Mega Pixel. I think somehow they manage to fake a lower pixel sensor by masking the pixels with artifacts caused by the high compression rate...
I think this isn't effect of high compression rate. in the EXIF data i can see that ISO is set to 320! for such a tiny sensor even ISO125 is too much.
read my post and AbuBasim's reply to it.
and i think you should resize that pic and link to the full size. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-11 20:20
