| Author |
The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008 |
iva_se
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: 213
From: Georgia, Tbilisi
PM, WWW
|
Mizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzle |
|
|
Hiron
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Denpasar - Bali, Indonesia
PM |
I see many contradiction here...
Look at Smape's Prev Here.
Smape CLAIMS that they has latest C905 with final cam module from Sony, but they don't even mention Exmor.
Look at this C905 SAMPLES from Smape.
100% Crop of Smape's C905 (R1AA081):
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, visit mobil.idnes.cz
THIS site has a NEWER C905 proto than Smape (The EXIF told us), and this site CLAIMS that their protos using Sony CMOS Exmor Sensor.
Few highlights from mobil.idnes.cz:
"When compared to any dslr,like the a200, the C905 falls flat to the ground- afterall, the chip doesn't MAKE the pictures, the optics do"
"the results still haven't reached the quality we expected- the pictures are pale and a bit foggy. As of now the C905 also has troubles in bright light-the pic gets overburned-usually more towards it's center. And yes - purple fringing is here to stay."
"BUT take a look at the comparison pics taken by coleague c902- the c905 has a vast amount of more details- this must be caused by the chip, beecause the megapixel jump wasn't that prominent. Digital noise is still at large with the c905, but much less than with the c902, so the c905 keeps more details."
"SE has about 2 months to queak this model- fixing color reproduction and hopefully the fogginess aswell, but we can already state that the c905 has a great chance of becoming the best cameraphone to date."
Look at this C905 SAMPLES from mobil.idnes.cz.
100% Crop of newer C905 from mobil.idnes.cz (R1AA083):
Worse image in newer firmware? Purple fringing exists? Hmm... Smape's older proto is better...
All I can say, both of the sites still has OLD C905, but it's still newer than early proto.
Why? C905 newer protos has newer firmware revision (R1BA0xx), and also including geotagging in their EXIF... Both of the sites brought old EXIF.
This non-sense claim makes me confused...
And yeah, why SE doesn't learn from K850's mistake by adding two-layer lens? Although the 2nd layer is a mineral glass for protective purposes, it still would make Lens problem (if you has the protos, you know what I'm talking about.)
K800 has one-layer for focusing, that would give huge advantages. Just look at purple-fringing that C905 has.
And for comparison, see Innov8 samples HERE.
100% Crop:
Who is the winner? Too many rumours around. Please someone makes clear about the cam modules C905 used. 
Hiron
[ This Message was edited by: Hiron on 2008-08-04 08:41 ] |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
the c905 or innov8 are not rumours.
please post any discussions on either phone in their respective threads or create a thread comparing their photo quality.
this is not the place. people come here to read rumours. not info on already released phones
ta
|
moogoo
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: NYC
PM, WWW
|
Hiron... take it to the C905 thread please. we're here for RUMORS.. not discussion of an announced phone.
moogoo
Nokia 5160 -> Nokia 8260 -> SE T68i -> SE K700i -> SE Z710 -> SE Xperia X10a -> Sony Xperia S -> Sony Xperia Z1 -> Sony Xperia XZ -> Sony Xperia XZ Premium -> Sony Xperia 1ii
Website: https://www.mikedoesitall.com |
Hiron
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Denpasar - Bali, Indonesia
PM |
I'm sorry. My bad. I just wrote my response from these post in this topic, several page ago:
On 2008-08-03 20:28:30, gola wrote:
"The potential bestseller is to appear in October (while the closest competitor, - Samsung i8510, - will become available a month earlier yet..."
"SE are going to implement a different and better camera..." 
I don't understand how they can have the final version of the C905 before the i8510 even though the i8510 will be released before the C905 
On 2008-08-03 20:59:59, prototype_bo wrote:
as Eldar mentioned in his (arm race) topic, it is a Samsung CMOS sensor.
the difference is in the algorithm.
http://www.smape.com/en/revie[....]ny_Ericsson_C905_cam-prev.html
judging from these pics found on this website, the camera prowess looks promising
[ This Message was edited by: prototype_bo on 2008-08-03 20:06 ]
On 2008-08-04 07:06:22, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
On 2008-08-04 06:31:52, kreacher wrote:
On 2008-08-04 01:52:02, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
No, Eldar had an earlier prototype with the Samsung sensor, and he should not have been judging the phone on it. Just one of the mistakes he has made lately. The later prototypes have the Sony sensor.
I really really doubt that something so integral as the sensor in a camera phone would totally change from a prototype to a final product.
Well Smape, among others, has confirmed it. The reason it may have changed may simply be that Sony's sensor wasn't ready for a while or something like that.
By the way, the cam module used is still rumours, isn't it?
EDIT: Now I has been posted in respective topic. I'm sorry.
Hiron
[ This Message was edited by: Hiron on 2008-08-04 08:33 ] |
BoyBawang
Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Posts: 332
PM |
On 2008-08-04 09:14:21, >500 wrote:
ah. how many hours are there in a day? i dont think all 24 of them have passed yet. so that means, its still monday, and there is still time for mizzle to post. be patient.
Yeah! Mizzle is probably busy shooting the right angles and some youtube stuffs |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Oh will you take it easy, there's absolutely nothing to freak out about. |
Pop Lover
Joined: Jun 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Amman, Jordan
PM |
On 2008-08-03 12:19:50, Pop Lover wrote:
On 2008-08-03 12:05:48, titus1 wrote:
I hope by tomorrow somebody here will going to put a smile to everyone's face.
I knew one and it's seem not a big deal
ahm ahm 
[ This Message was edited by: Pop Lover on 2008-08-04 08:44 ] |
rraz9228
Joined: Oct 30, 2003
Posts: 145
From: CA USA
PM |
On 2008-08-04 09:38:51, Mizzle wrote:
Oh will you take it easy, there's absolutely nothing to freak out about.
Are you trying to say that there is nothing special about the phone you will show us today? |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
^
Precisely
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Guys, I am NOT going to show you anything. If it goes by plan, SE will be the ones showing you something. And no, it's not that exciting. I never said it would be, you were the ones creating the hype, again.
|
tob!s
Joined: Oct 21, 2007
Posts: 217
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Today you will see a low-end phone. |
Phoner
Joined: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
 |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-04 09:49:33, tob!s wrote:
Today you will see a low-end phone.
BS.
|
Tigershark42
Joined: Dec 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sigh. People believe things before they see the slightest shred of evidence that it even exists. So what next? The flying spaghetti monster, probably...
But anyway, I actually thought today they would probably announce that line of digital photo frames Eldar was talking about in a SE-NSE post. It isnt all that relevant to me, so I'm indifferent. But it would make sense because that isnt really anything so exciting as a high end phone, nor is it a low end phone |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-04 09:15
