Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K750i Vs. S700i photo comparison. Check this out, guys.

Author K750i Vs. S700i photo comparison. Check this out, guys.
dkessel
K750
Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 11
From: The Netherlands
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 10:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Keep comparing... pfffff! boring!
A cellphone is not a DIGITAL CAMERA. if you want great pictures with nice color balance then go buy a digicam!. That's what digicams are for.
That's life so don't complain, take it or leave it.

Pictures below were taken with my K750




And This, taken with a digicam



I know we can't compare a cellphone with digicam!.




[ This Message was edited by: dkessel on 2005-07-13 10:22 ]

[ This Message was edited by: dkessel on 2005-07-13 10:23 ]
etaab
Nokia N8
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 10:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 07:38:52, Amras wrote:

Both sizes have the same proportion of 1:1.33 i think. So it's fair enough.




It does not matter. The point im making is, is that pictures taken in the full 1632x1224 resolution by the K750i do not resize down to 640x480 perfectly. The 1280x960 size images by the S700i do.

So naturally the S700i pictures will look sharper, or less pixelated in VGA size. The K750i pictures will be pixelated or blurred depending on which program you use to resize them.

I think a better comparison would be gained by taking pictures by both cameras in VGA resolution. Both the S700i and K750i are able to capture images in 640x480 - so it would be a better comparison of their capabilities.


Having said that, some of the pictures you posted i do prefer the S700i - but only marginally. For example the rag doll picture - the S700i version looks more colourful, whilst the K750i version looks a little drab. However, i doubt that has anything to do with the sensors alone, but the whole camera, its components, software and image processing and not mentioning the possibility that you simply took a bad picture with the K750i.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab !
vanquish
V600
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 11:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Thanks for that! I like the way you took the photos in a variety of different places, conditions etc. Well done! [addsig]
davidsic
Samsung Galaxy S 4
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 13:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Etab you're right ! which program use you to resize pics without compression.

I'm using PIXresizer, it's very easy to use but there's a bit visible compression after rezised pics 1632x1224 to 800x600.

I can't use photoshop.

dkessel, for the macro shot you're a bit too close, take the pic at 6/7 cm and you will optain better result

I made a comparison between the two here



[ This Message was edited by: davidsic on 2005-07-13 12:39 ]
REO
P1
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: U.S.A.
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 14:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
After looking at these photos again........ Unbiased conclusion --> I like the S pictures beter than the K. They just look better and richer.
BTW, I am not a K750 hater, I like the phone

@dkessel

Did you read the thread tittle? Do you have both cam phones? If you're not going to compare, what good is posting digitalcam pics V.S. camphone pics?
iphone rocks...
vanquish
V600
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 15:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
No, the S7 has slightly distorted colours and sharpness [addsig]
Grimslade
W995 Red
Joined: Jul 25, 2004
Posts: 464
From: London
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 15:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Seems to me the K750 has somewhat better dynamic range--in the last mall shot, where you couldn't decide, look at the the flourescent lights in the cieling. The S700's are blown out, while the K750 did a better job holding the highlights. The S700 shows somewhat more vibrant colors in some of the shots (such as the stuffed-animals shot). But I see no cause to complain about the K750's CMOS sensor in any of the shots. Thanks for the comparison.
tzakiel
K750
Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 66
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 16:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I have owned both phones, s700i and k750i. the k750 takes much better pictures.
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 16:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The comparison continues. Both phones show some advantages so it's hard to pick a better one.

a
K750i

S700i


b
K750i

S700i


c
K750i

S700i


d
K750i

S700i


e
K750i

S700i



S700i is mostly better in fluorescent conditions.


[addsig]
vanquish
V600
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 17:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
No, S700 exposes light more. [addsig]
tzakiel
K750
Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 66
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 17:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I disagree, the s700 is overexposing. I'd rather have all the information present so i can adjust the picture, than have a bright pic with lost data in the whites.
dkessel
K750
Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 11
From: The Netherlands
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 17:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 14:06:43, REO wrote:
@dkessel

Did you read the thread tittle? Do you have both cam phones? If you're not going to compare, what good is posting digitalcam pics V.S. camphone pics?




I've read the titel, i wanted to let you see that the fact with digicam is better in term of quality so 'BUY A DIGICAM IF YOU WANT TO TAKE GREAT PICTURES WITH NICE COLOR'
I don't use the camera feature of my K750 'cause i know a cellphone is not a digicam!.

And for davidsic, i did the right way to take macro, it's just the CMOS censor (s****) of SE that produces such macro pic. I'm not a newbee in photography world. but thanks for the advice.


[ This Message was edited by: dkessel on 2005-07-13 16:24 ]
vanquish
V600
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 17:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 17:19:38, tzakiel wrote:
I disagree, the s700 is overexposing. I'd rather have all the information present so i can adjust the picture, than have a bright pic with lost data in the whites.



Who are you disagreeing with, me or him? [addsig]
anay
C902 Black
Joined: Sep 17, 2004
Posts: 296
From: London
PM
Posted: 2005-07-13 17:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Good comparison amras. the s700 ones only look brighter is some pics -thats the main difference i can tell.

Im going on holiday soon, so what would be the best resolution to take photos with (on k750) if i want to get them developed some where, like boots.
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-07-13 17:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:
I've read the titel, i wanted to let you see that the fact with digicam is better in term of quality so 'BUY A DIGICAM IF YOU WANT TO TAKE GREAT PICTURES WITH NICE COLOR'
I don't use the camera feature of my K750 'cause i know a cellphone is not a digicam!.



Anyway, it wasn't made for people who get confused on having a digicam or camera phone. It was made for people who don't know what to buy, S700i or K750i.

[addsig]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi