| Author |
Least likely fone manufacturer u would buy? ;-) |
milmino
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Posts: 454
From: Kenya
PM, WWW
|
from the list, I'd be least likely to buy a motorola, but not because of personal disinterest, but because of lack of choice. But least like siemens, because they're not my style
posted from a pc clone |
|
|
Debu
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Colchester, UK
PM |
Now that i think again, maybe i wont purchase seimens either, But companies are always pulling out rabbits from under their hats, you just never know. One cannot say that 'I just wont buy this brand', that would be pig-headed. An open mind should be kept. |
milmino
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Posts: 454
From: Kenya
PM, WWW
|
@debu i agree all these companies can pleasantly suprise us, eg. samsung, who are pulling several "worlds firsts" in their technology.
posted from a pc clone |
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
samsung
overpriced
nothing works like it should
not much features/technology
poor conectivitie
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA |
brix25
Joined: Aug 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Cape Town, South Africa
PM, WWW
|
I almost bought a Samsung X600 last year, before that I never considered a Samsung. Least likely phone I would buy has to be Moto, the UI is not very intuitive.
This message was posted from a T68i |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@debu: I am open-minded. Have used almost every brand on the planet. And from that standpoint + current lineup, I can tell that unless Samsung changes the direction in which they are going, I am not likely to spend my money on one. If I had no phone & someone gave me one, chances are I would sell it & buy a cheap Siemens, SE or Nokia :-)
This message was posted from a P800 |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
sagem and telit and some others small firms.as for the 1st 2 they r cheap and lack quality
This message was posted from a WAP device |
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
I think samsung won this competition.
This message was posted from a K500 |
fatreg
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
have you lot never heard of VK?
now they are BAD!
fatreg
|
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@govigov: No doubt. But they still outsell most ofvthe other brands. Surely, our opinions here on esato are not the opinion of the world at large ;-)
This message was posted from a P800 |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
Yeah. They're really good in competitions like these! :-D
This message was posted from a T230 |
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
World needs a phone for just talking and text. I think the 3310 does that nicely. Samsung is for ppl who need a glorified 3310.
This message was posted from a K500 |
k700nut
Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: manchester,england.
PM, WWW
|
i avoid moto and samsung because of the illogical menu layout.@rick007..siemens phones are imo,better built than all brands.like anything german,it tends to be good clobber.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
Jake Blues
Joined: May 24, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@fatreg
who on earth are VK? are their phones available on orange?
[addsig] |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@k700nut: My sentiments about Siemens phones too. Good build. Great features. Good prices. @govi & whiz: Yeah, explains why both Nokia & Samsung have the rest of the world eating from the palm of their hand.
This message was posted from a P800 |
|
|
Posted: 2005-01-15 19:21
