| Author |
Least likely fone manufacturer u would buy? ;-) |
RicK700i
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Posts: 385
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Which of these top cellphone manufacturers would you LEAST likely to buy?
Samsung,Nokia,Motorola or Siemens.
And why?
This message was posted from a T300 |
|
|
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
Samsung. They dont know what compatiblity is.
This message was posted from a K500 |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
Samsung. Reason already stated.
This message was posted from a T230 |
ThreeX
Joined: Dec 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Samsung, because i consider myself a power user, and that is incompatible with Samsung.
I bet they are nice phones to pick up from the box and just use until you retire them, but they´re not for me.
(Yes i HAVE owned one in case you wonder)
Happy owner of: Ericsson GH198, S868, SH888, R310s, T10s, T28s, A2618s, T39m x2, T68m, T66, SE t68i, T610, S700i, Nokia 2110i, 6210, 8310, 8850, 8890 and 6680 Siemens S55 |
Pradhika
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM |
Nokia. Physically stronger.
This message was posted from a T610 |
ThreeX
Joined: Dec 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-01-15 18:19:50, Pradhika wrote:
Nokia. Physically stronger.
This message was posted from a T610
|
|
Duh.. care to elaborate??
Happy owner of: Ericsson GH198, S868, SH888, R310s, T10s, T28s, A2618s, T39m x2, T68m, T66, SE t68i, T610, S700i, Nokia 2110i, 6210, 8310, 8850, 8890 and 6680 Siemens S55 |
k4m!k4ze
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: CBE
PM |
@threex - i think she meant 'brick' 
As for my choice - Motorola
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence of your attempt !! |
Cycovision
Joined: Nov 30, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM, WWW
|
Not on the list, but Motorola. I ended up stuck with a V50 for a year (on contract and couldn't upgrade / quit the contract without it costing me a fortune) and hated everything about the phone. Bad voice clarity, useless features and an awful menu navigation system.
They might have improved somewhat by now put that particular phone put me off Motorola in a big way |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
That would have to be Samsung. Their phones have the least functionality in that grouping.
This message was posted from a P800 |
RicK700i
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Posts: 385
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
@ Pradika, the question is which phone manufacturer would you least likely buy.You mentioned a good thing about Nokia's physique. For me I would say the Siemens ,not interestf in their phones because they quality , not far behind is the poor Samsung that is highly-overated on the market with their featureless phones.
This message was posted from a T300 |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
I have used both Siemens & Samsung, and will consider the former before looking at either Samsung or Nokia. Functionality & feature wise, I consider SE, Moto & Siemens in the same class.
This message was posted from a P800 |
RicK700i
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Posts: 385
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Edit in previous post: For me I would say the Siemens ,not interested in their phones because they dont have quality!
This message was posted from a T300 |
Debu
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Colchester, UK
PM |
I would be most unlikely to spend good money in purchasing a Neonode. I dont think samsung is bad, they are quite good on build quality, mostly their phone software is rather unevolved. I like te phones coming down the chute, the WM phone looks very interesting, and i wont be surprised i find myself purchasing one. |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
Samsung's build quality is okay, but most of their phones seem targeted at non-business, non-power users. Meaning they exclude people like me from their prospects. Most other brands have something for this segment. Not Samsung.
This message was posted from a P800 |
Jake Blues
Joined: May 24, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
motorola, for all the above reasons.
oh and siemens because that name is just WRONG!!
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2005-01-15 18:04
