Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > "Normal" vs. "Fine"

Previous  12
Author "Normal" vs. "Fine"
ares
P1
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM
Posted: 2004-07-20 15:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The fine looks more sharp, but a bit more grainy also...so, i think the normal setting should be used for nigh/indoor photos, to decrease the big amounts of noise those type photos have in k700.
SE w880 + Iphone 4 16gb
Andrew21
K750
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
Posts: 207
PM
Posted: 2004-07-20 15:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think, fine has better quality as normal.
vrl29
S700
Joined: Dec 25, 2004
Posts: 305
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2005-07-24 11:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i really can't tell the difference...
SE T68i (Feb2004-May2004)
SE T610 (Sep2004-Jun2005)
SE K700i (Jun2005-Sep2005)
SE S700i (Sep2005-Present)
blackspot
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2005-07-25 05:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Fine uses less compression that's why it shows more details (grainy specially in poor lighting). Normal mode uses more compression so a lot of details will appear to be patches of plain blocks (blurry). I always use fine as it gives you a more accurate detail of textures. In the two photos in the first page you can see the difference in the texture of the floor and the pot.
resistance is futile.
xerx
X2 Black
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
Posts: 375
From: New York City
PM
Posted: 2005-07-25 05:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

not too much difference harhar
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi