Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > T65 versus T39 ....

Previous  12
Author T65 versus T39 ....
3.1415926
T300
Joined: Mar 15, 2002
Posts: 236
From: Finland
PM
Posted: 2002-05-13 22:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2002-05-13 21:44, kristaga wrote:
You forgot to put R520m between T68 and T39.

K.A.



No way I think the R520 belongs between T39 and T66. It have good features but it isn't the smallest phone on the market after all.

And what about T39 users do U find the antenna annoying or is it hardly noticeable.
arunmr
T39 black
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: 73
PM
Posted: 2002-05-14 06:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
believe it or not.... i love the t39's antenna. it was one of the reasons i bought the phone...
and the t39 is a CLASS act.... i have yet to see a flip phone that looks this good
Aikonoklast
K600
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM
Posted: 2002-05-14 12:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
T39 is great! I just got one today! The small screen not a problem at all!

This post was posted from a T39

kristaga
R520
Joined: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 141
From: Norig/Norway
PM, WWW
Posted: 2002-05-15 23:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2002-05-13 22:10, 3.1415926 wrote:
No way I think the R520 belongs between T39 and T66. It have good features but it isn't the smallest phone on the market after all.

And what about T39 users do U find the antenna annoying or is it hardly noticeable.



The bigger screen puts R520m above T39, together with the option butten that T39 lacks. The size does not really matter for me, I even think that that R520m has the perfect size for my big hands.

K.A.

sasha
T39 black
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
Posts: 9
From: USA
PM
Posted: 2002-05-15 23:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
520 is bulky, while t39 is as close to perfect as it gets The antenna is just great and not only because the reception is better (or is it an urban legend?), but it also defines the style. A great one.
danieliew
K750
Joined: May 07, 2002
Posts: 96
From: Malaysia
PM
Posted: 2002-05-16 01:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
IMHO, R520m features in a T39 form factor would be superb!! What do you guys think? Or am I asking for too much!?
StoneBolt
K700
Joined: Feb 24, 2002
Posts: 66
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
Posted: 2002-05-16 04:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I already have my t68 but I still use my R520. It has everything one needs in a phone. T39 and T68 lack the speakerphone function of R520. It maybe big but it's as light as T39 or T68.
Aikonoklast
K600
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM
Posted: 2002-05-16 06:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This is supposed to be a t65 vs t39 thread. What i have noticed with the 39 is that the vibrator is quite weak, makes me miss calls. Also the signal blanks out when the phone is in my pocket...

This post was posted from a T39

Aikonoklast
K600
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM
Posted: 2002-05-16 07:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Well cant have a perfect phone...

This post was posted from a T39

Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi