| Author |
T65 versus T39 .... |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
This would have been a no-brainer if the T39 had a larger screen. I have no use for Bluetooth and the GSM1900 band. I can live without IR as long as there's a data cable.
So, which one should I get? Let's focus on the essentials like T9 speed, battery life, ringer volume, keypad ergonomics, vibra strength. Do you think the T39's small screen is a liability? |
|
|
horwa
Joined: May 13, 2002
Posts: 1
PM, WWW
|
I agree with you , I love T65 . |
arnoldc
Joined: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
based on your requirements, T65 it is. |
ts_666
Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: 301
From: SWEDEN (actually UK now)
PM |
in my opinion, t39 is the next best thing after after t68/i |
bonito99
Joined: May 07, 2002
Posts: 368
From: The Philippine Islands
PM |
T39's screen is not a liability at all ü . T65 is good but T39 is better
This post was posted from a T39 |
SilveR.
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
T39 looks better  |
bonbon
Joined: Apr 24, 2002
Posts: 22
PM |
i reckon da t39 is more of a business fone...get wat i mean?
t65 is more "casual"
screen size...up 2 da user really,
on da t65...HUGE! =D
depends on situation, if u dun need all da features of t39...t65 it is!
da cost between dem aint dat huge neway, |
kevin81
Joined: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 390
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
I agree with you, bonbon!
|
bluWAP
Joined: Apr 05, 2002
Posts: 15
From:
PM |
As you describe your needs, I think you will love the T65. Being oldfashioned I do not even use the capabilities with T9...I only find it annoying...  |
boysaint
Joined: Mar 26, 2002
Posts: 111
PM |
that's right..... it depends on your level of satisfaction. if your needs are only up to what you mentioned in your note... a t65 is all you need! |
jubalong
Joined: Feb 15, 2002
Posts: 40
PM |
Go for the T65!
If nothing else, the larger display is worth it alone if you have no use for IR/Tri-Band. (And in humble my opinion, a much better design.)
I get about 220h+ of stand-by time and 4-6h talk time on my T65, which is nice...
|
Thief
Joined: Jan 11, 2002
Posts: 121
From: Greece
PM |
I would buy the T39... it is much better regarding it's features, and it's a more "serious" phone, as mencioned above... I think that sometime you might need the ir connection. And it's screen is very legible, despite the size... I have used it and i really enjoyed it, contrary to the T65, which had a keypad that gave me a hard time trying to press the keys!! It was like a dummie! Anyways, despite my opinion about the T39, both of them are good phones, and no matter which you choose, i think you will be pleased!
Th|eF |
Pedals
Joined: May 08, 2002
Posts: 10
PM |
I have a T39. had it a week. I think it's a great mobile phone. Nice display, good battery life, IR is handy. It's great looking too.
Can't comment on the T65. I have used many Ericsson phones and they have all been good. T39 best so far.
Pedals |
salonikat68
Joined: May 02, 2002
Posts: 152
From: greece/salonika
PM, WWW
|
T68(i)>T39>T66>T65>T29>T28...
 |
kristaga
Joined: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 141
From: Norig/Norway
PM, WWW
|
You forgot to put R520m between T68 and T39. K.A. |
|
|
Posted: 2002-05-13 10:33
