| Author |
Coming Soon! A new cellphone network in the Philippines |
adv99576
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: 2
From: philippines
PM, WWW
|
anyone who is interested (or knows someone who is capable of) to help finance the new digital network, please send me a private message. we're talking here about billions of pesos...
Want to know more about your cellular choices? (for Filipinos only) Go to this site: www.philippine-utilities.com.ph |
|
|
reinstadt
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
Posts: 1
From: Jerico Amurao
PM |
I learned a lot.. thanks for the info. u guys are great! but what is this CDMA stands for? sorry to ask..
|
ex_crusader
Joined: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 9
From: Philippines?
PM, WWW
|
CDMA stands for CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS. |
reinstadt
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
Posts: 1
From: Jerico Amurao
PM |
Thanks bro. Good day to all..
|
friedbrains
Joined: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 23
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-01-05 15:39:13, jplacson wrote:
and DVDs offer worse video quality over the older Laserdisc systems... but Laserdiscs lived a very short life before DVDs came in.
|
|
Not true, DVD has higher resolution compared to LD, i forgot the actual resolutions but i am quite sure DVD is better than LD |
ynohtna
Joined: Dec 27, 2002
Posts: 278
From: PH
PM |
@adv
just to add, i read from the dailies (just this week either Manila times or Star, I could not remember) that NTC is already studying rates and license fees for 3G and there are two (2) new firms applying for 3g as their start up technology and not GSM. And they (our governement) will try not to repeat the experience of European operators which are still incurring big losses due to the high government license fees because of 3G hype. These two firms are separate from our present local networks (globe, smart, sun). I think the other one starts with letter M...Mind Link something and the other starts with C....Cure!!!Pardon my short term memory for now. |
mcastro
Joined: Jan 19, 2002
Posts: 62
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-03-11 11:32:09, adv99576 wrote:
anyone who is interested (or knows someone who is capable of) to help finance the new digital network, please send me a private message. we're talking here about billions of pesos...
|
|
...youre kidding right??? ...no offense but why would a big project like this look for investors in forums ..? ..just a thought... 
[ This Message was edited by: mcastro on 2004-04-07 14:53 ] |
adv99576
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: 2
From: philippines
PM, WWW
|
no kidding!
this is serious stuff.
i could explain more, but maybe through private messaging...
pm me if you really wanna know...
Want to know more about your cellular choices? (for Filipinos only) Go to this site: www.philippine-utilities.com.ph |
Aivar
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Estonia
PM |
Just a fact: GSM is number one mobile communication system in the world. CDMA is long way behind... |
GOwin
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: .uʍop ǝpısdn s&
PM, WWW
|
@aivar
Let's qualify that statement: GSM is number one in terms user-base and availability. Technically speaking, there are are better alternatives out there.  |
adv99576
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: 2
From: philippines
PM, WWW
|
@ GOwin
i second your motion... =)
Want to know more about your cellular choices? (for Filipinos only) Go to this site: www.philippine-utilities.com.ph |
kenski
Joined: Aug 15, 2002
Posts: 369
From: Philippines
PM |
This is indeed a very interesting topic to say the least I hope cdma arrives here in the philippines soon enough for us (globe,smart,sun users) to have a more viable alternative.
 forever Read the FAQ before u post a new topic.. 8810->6150->3310->t68i->t610->t630->k700i  |
swipe108
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 264
From: Philippines
PM |
@adv99576
I think you forgot these facts:
CDMA2000 has narrower bandwidth than WCDMA. its slower than than WCDMA. Aside from that, WCDMA signals can also be be boosted by EDGE equipment to obtain even higher bandwidth.
CDMA2000 is the upgrade of current CDMA networks. therefore, it not compatible with with GSM equipment. Local GSM operators will have to shell out much more money in order to build up a CDMA2000 network.
There are no dual mode CDMA2000-GSM handsets. if you want to use CDMA2000 you'll have very small coverage. you'll still need a GSM handset. All WCDMA handsets being manufactured are dual mode to allow smooth handoff of calls between network elements because the WCDMA networks are built on top of a GSM network.
IMO, Express is way too late in the game. They wouldn't even be able to get the critical mass in order to justify nationwide expansion of a CDMA network much less a CDMA2000 network. |
swipe108
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 264
From: Philippines
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-04-01 13:51:12, ynohtna wrote:
@adv
just to add, i read from the dailies (just this week either Manila times or Star, I could not remember) that NTC is already studying rates and license fees for 3G and there are two (2) new firms applying for 3g as their start up technology and not GSM. And they (our governement) will try not to repeat the experience of European operators which are still incurring big losses due to the high government license fees because of 3G hype. These two firms are separate from our present local networks (globe, smart, sun). I think the other one starts with letter M...Mind Link something and the other starts with C....Cure!!!Pardon my short term memory for now.
|
|
I'm pretty sure the people behind these companies will soon back out. 3G handsets cost so much more than GSM handset. How in the world will attract subscribers with handsets that cost as much as a P900. the current success of mobile operators in the Philippines is due to the prepaid market. Globe wasn't making money when its subscriber base was purely postpaid. When they introduced prepaid, Smart saw that there was a quicker way to get subscribers without the hassle of credit checks and so they jumped on the GSM bandwagon.
Does anyone actually believe that the Philippines postpaid market alone can sustain two 3G network operators? I don't think so. Will the prepaid market buy 3G? I don't think so. Handsets costs alone will be prohibitive not to mention the cost of 3G services.
It would be so much better if they decided to tie-up with existing operators instead. Build the the 3G network on top of Globe or Smart's existing network so that the the excess capacities of the two can be put to good use. The only problem with this concept is that the two giants may not want to split 3G revenues with anybody. |
GOwin
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: .uʍop ǝpısdn s&
PM, WWW
|
A viable alternative to 3G could be Wireless VOIP or a 2/2.5G-Wireless VOIP combo
[ This Message was edited by: GOwin on 2004-07-28 06:59 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2004-03-11 11:32
forever 
