| Author |
Ericsson T610 or Nokia 7250i ??? |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
t610 of course,nokia got small resolution.only4096 cočours,only 16 channel polyphonic,no bluetooth,"half" ic,becouse she receiving just text via ic,dont send and record any sound,got stupid mms with only one pictures and one text,without polys.... only java(mophun is better,faster etc) got 4 mb memory,together with phonebook,messages,calendar,notes etc you cant store just pictures........sorry for my english is not my mom language,but i hope you understand me!!!greetings |
|
|
BonC
Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Posts: 160
PM |
@ anonymous 1
Hmmm your a lady (havent noticed many on the forum) - very detailed/intelligent report, nice one - u forgot to mention the T610 is a sexy phone, im sure that swayed your decision also!!!
Ive already commented on this topic, if u do a search original poster (sorry forgot name) you'll find BonC's comments...
but ill say this quickly, having owned both phones -
viewing a picture I had taken on a 7250 on the actual phone made me wanna cry! - they were awful, the dot matrix screen and lack of colours made it so (however if transfered to PC they came up extremley well - in fact better than the T610pics on PC)
I sold the 7250 after a week
I still have the T610 for about 3 months now.
In my eyes a phone with an intergrated camera - had better make sure the camera is of decent quality or what the heck is the point.
Dont throw a substandard camera on as an after thought - BonC wont stand for it - LOL
Original Pager crew....
|
sshadoww
Joined: Jul 02, 2003
Posts: 21
From: Malaysia
PM |
The main reason I bought T610 is I like it's look (exterior design) very much 
Silence is golden
But my eyes still see
@_@ |
anonymous1
Joined: Aug 10, 2003
Posts: 154
From: London UK
PM |
Hey BonC, although the picture quality on the 7250 is better once uploaded on to a PC I personally feel its more important to have the picture quality better on the phone for caller ID purposes and for having a general laugh as the primary purpose is to use the pics with the phone. In which case the 7250 pics look absolutely terrible when viewed on the phone. Put me right off. |
kidscruff
Joined: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 332
From: England
PM, WWW
|
The ringtones on Nokias are generally pretty loud, and incredibly obtrusive!
I was on a train, and the guy next to me started ringing (Nokia 5100 I believe). It was this (awful) tune, and sounded like some kid was whistling into my ear as hard as possible - very distorted and unpleasant.
But then again the 3650 was REALLY quiet when I tried it.
The T610 is pretty loud, but depends a lot on the midi files used.
[ This Message was edited by: kidscruff on 2003-08-13 00:57 ] |
darkman
Joined: Dec 29, 2002
Posts: 138
From: Sweden
PM |
Nice melody:D But not the HIIIIIII tones they really hurted my ears:(
--P1i-- |
ermetek
Joined: May 10, 2002
Posts: 65
PM |
I very disappointed of the reception, I read some review and all talk of the poor rx of the T610.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
The reception of the T610 is not bad at all. It's pretty good. It's better than my old T68i. This is in Sweden with on the 900/1800Mhz GSM bands. It might not be good on the 1900Mhz band in the US (well mostly in US), but I don't know since I don't live there.
But on the "normal" GSM bands used in most parts of the world the reception is very good.
Almost all people complaining about the reception is from US. Quite alot of people compares the tri-band T610's reception with the reception of other phones that are made for the 1900Mhz band only, you should compare it with other tri-band phones. Antenna design is a complicated issue and the 1900Mhz band is not optimal for an antenna which is made for the 900/1800Mhz. People living in an area which uses the 1900Mhz band should buy the T616 instead since that antenna is optimized for 850Mhz/1900Mhz.
[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-08-13 11:24 ] |
ermetek
Joined: May 10, 2002
Posts: 65
PM |
The T610 rx is better than T68i, sure? It's possible compare the T610's reception with other phone, nokia or samsung? Thx
This message was posted from a T68i |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Both the T610 and the T68i performs very well (recpetion wise) compared with some of my friends Nokias. No idea about Samsung though. But the Samsung phones should be better since almost all Samsungs have an external antenna (which has advantages).
It's not that easy to compare reception anyway. You have to be in an area where there is almost no signal, and then try to make a call, and see which phone still can make a call.
The number of "reception bars" on the display is totally irrelevant, since the number of bars represent different things on deifferent brands. Also Nokia phones doesn't refresh the signal bars on the phone as frequently as SE does. Last but not least the singal bars on differnet brands may use different algorithms for signal levels, (the signal bars doesn't have to be linear). |
Orange2k3
Joined: Aug 10, 2003
Posts: 14
From: mars
PM |
t610 |
square66
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Posts: 4
From: UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-08-13 18:33:35, Orange2k3 wrote:
t610
|
|
took the words right outta my mouth...
Big B
|
virtualtears
Joined: Mar 24, 2002
Posts: 98
PM, WWW
|
I've had the 7250i as well as the T610 (and now the Z600 which imo beats them both). As previously stated, the 7250i is simply a 7210 with more memory, picture phonebook and a camera. The 7250i is a pretty good phone, no doubt about it, but in my opinion it just isn't in the same league as the t610. And this is coming from a long-time Nokia user. If you can't go without a speakerphone and a radio then by all means get a 7250. But if you want a very complete phone with class, get the t610.
Oh, one more thing. I'm what you might consider a very fast texter. The t9 on the 7250i is spot on, I can never make it run behind me. With the t610, it appears that the text lags behind you if you are very fast, but in reality it is just the words updating that lags slightly. I can text just as fast on a t610 as I can on a 7250i.
If you want a phone that beats them both, get a Z600. Its a better version of the t610, but only as long as you like clamshell/flip phones. |
Jowi
Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Pilipinas
PM, WWW
|
t610 |
alex_ng_003
Joined: Dec 20, 2003
Posts: 56
From: Sydney, Australia
PM, WWW
|
hi i also had this very problem but i chose the 7250i as i wanted to be unique, the phone looks way better, bigger screen, bluetooth but the t610 has crap sounding poly tones but i like how you can customize the t610 a lot more ethan tha 7250i
Alex Ng
alex_ng_003@optusnet.com.au
alex_termin8s@hotmail.com
SEND MMS OR WAT EVA U WANT TO +61412951386 |
|
|
Posted: 2003-08-12 15:09
