Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K750 vs N82

Previous  1234  Next
Author K750 vs N82
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 13:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
can clearly see it's a cid:49 also in the newer firmware sound & cam quality was downgraded to force people to buy the newer phones thats how good se's marketing is lol,

cid:36 really old firmware and cam driver
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k750i

my k750 is broken so i can't take any new pics or compare it with anything.
PowerLee
Nokia Lumia 928
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 344
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 13:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-07-08 12:01:00, whizkidd wrote:
Nice comparo!! The xenon flash comparo is revealing !!




Would like to see the picture taken again with the K750 & the MXE 60 xenon flash add on used.

[ This Message was edited by: PowerLee on 2008-07-08 12:29 ]
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 13:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
no no no... it not so easy to see if its a cid49 or cid36. (to just look at some pics in cloudy weather)

i had a cid36 k750 and my friend had a newer (red) cid49 k750, and the pictures wasnt soooo different when we look at the computer


once again, WHO HAVE EVER SAID THIS PICS IS FROM A CID49 K750 ????

dont forgett, its with original cam driver. (like it suppose to have). and with original cam driver K750 produce quite mediocre pictures.

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-08 12:33 ]
xironghostx
W350 White
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 13:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-07-08 13:30:42, plankgatan wrote:


i had a cid36 k750 and my friend had a newer (red) cid49 k750, and the pictures wasnt soooo different when we look at the computer

Well, maybe you was bad to take pictures with the k750?!


once again, WHO HAVE EVER SAID THIS PICS IS FROM A CID49 K750 ????




Number1
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 13:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
eeehhhh. he guess YES. he cant possible know for sure ...or ??????

(what i know, you can only know if you either ask Luci or have the phone in your hand)...


or is it some kind of software you can see with ?????
(Exif pro, etc.... dont tell anything about the cam module)

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-08 12:50 ]
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-07-08 14:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
bloody hell! if someone will say that this sharpness is normal then I can say knock knock in your head!

dont forgett, its with original cam driver. (like it suppose to have)

Plank don't make me laugh...

1. this is comparision of old 2MP and new 5MP technology
2. Nokia software engineers are always on top, if they want to create good cameraphone they will put all efforts on this task

and you're telling me "like it suppose to have"?

why we should compare new and fine tuned N82 with old and bad tuned K750? is this right? modded driver for K750 is nothing more than fine tuned driver which can give you REAL results of hardware capabilities. is this still unfair for you? ok, so look above at point 1 - this is fair in your opinion?
se_dude
Xperia Arc Silver
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 15:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Okay.then someone do a comparison with modded firmware please.My k750 takes much better pics than the one shown there.
Guto_ViP
T200
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-07-08 16:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Another comparision?
Love or hate me...

Nokia 5120 -> Nokia 6120 -> SE T200 -> Motorola V800 -> SE W800 (stay with my wife) - > SE K800 (stay with my mom) -> Nokia N82 Silver -> Nokia N82 Black Edition - Firmware v30.0.019 -> What is the next??.
milan91
K800 Black
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 16:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Maybe one big comparision k750i vs k800i vs k850i vs n82
DCUK7
Xperia X10 Mini Black
Joined: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool, UK
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 16:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-07-08 16:18:08, milan91 wrote:
Maybe one big comparision k750i vs k800i vs k850i vs n82



*cough* and digi cam *cough*
Formerly ~DC:UK~
Intrigue
Model not set
Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 31
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 17:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Nice pic Luci'spower.Now compare W950 and N82 cam
cronos555
W810 black
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 19:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
those pics are definitely from a cid49 module. the cid36 module produced much much better pics. and plank, if SE released a k850 firmware tomorrow that upgraded the camera software that produced better pics, you'd be the first to jump on it and parade how good the new firmware is ... well there is no difference in getting a free upgrade with a modified cam driver that produces better pics. so why is it that we need to use default cam driver for comparison pics? you're not making sense.
W810 CID49 R4EA031
PowerLee
Nokia Lumia 928
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 344
PM
Posted: 2008-07-08 19:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-07-08 19:33:42, cronos555 wrote:
and plank, if SE released a k850 firmware tomorrow that upgraded the camera software that produced better pics, you'd be the first to jump on it and parade how good the new firmware is ... well there is no difference in getting a free upgrade with a modified cam driver that produces better pics. so why is it that we need to use default cam driver for comparison pics? you're not making sense.



When has Plank ever made any sense on here?

If anybody dares say a bad word about the K850's picture taking ability he is the first to defend it with his pictures ( that are never shown full size anyway )

I rate the K850 as one of the worst phones ever released by SE ( so far )

Everybody just keeps falling for that Cyber Shot branding.

timebomb
K750
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
Posts: 27
PM
Posted: 2008-08-03 17:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
th postwriter is a numpty nokia fan n intentionally messed up k750i pics. k750i not sharp? how is this?
kannm
T68 gold
Joined: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2008-08-04 09:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
if you modify k750i camdriver,

n81 will be out of necessary.

resize only:


and again





[ This Message was edited by: kannm on 2008-08-04 09:07 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi