| Author |
K750 vs N82 |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Ok this is pics are take with all auto and all with the standard camdrive in the k750 situation
1.
K750
N82
2.
Well it's hard to take a indoor pic with the standard camdrive (k750)
took this pic 3 times and this is the best i could get
N82
3.
K750
N82
4.
K750
N82
5.
K750
N82
6.This is to show how important xenon is....this pic was taken from 3m distance.....This is why most of the people here maintain that the K800/K810/K850 are having a better overall camera.....For example i wouldn't buy a phone for his camera if he doesen't have a xenon
K750
N82.
This is my comparasion.....enjoy
_________________
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice
[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-07-08 10:58 ] |
|
|
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
Nice comparo!! The xenon flash comparo is revealing  !!
T230 >> T610 >> Ngage QD >> N73 >> N85 >> Omnia HD >> And countless other review units |
darknoob
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
N82 pictures are much sharper than K750,
but K850 also can produce pictures like K850.
Luci, It would nice to do compare N82 vs K850 |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
well i'll do that.....i have both phones
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice |
strizlow800
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM |
K750 is older... But nice comparison after all  . You should compare N82 to some new A200  phone for example.
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
i assume thats a cid:49 k750i my old cid:36 could take alot better pics than that. |
Sirhackalot
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Posts: 463
From: Bermuda, Uk
PM, WWW
|
very nice to see you have an honest comparison and not shaking one of the phones to give worst results.
|
strizlow800
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM |
Again, you are comparing 2 different generations phones... K750 is old and the K850 is new... It is normally that the K850 should make better pics than K750 (IF you use it properly)  .
But K750 is not that bad too...
On 2008-07-08 12:14:30, number1 wrote:
i assume thats a cid:49 k750i my old cid:36 could take alot better pics than that.
Well CID36 K750s have 12chip camera module while the CID49 ones have 9... The CID36 K750 produce much better picture compared to CID49 ones.
_________________
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support!
Phone Flashing Tutorial (DB2020 CID49/51/52)
[ This Message was edited by: strizlow800 on 2008-07-08 11:17 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-07-08 12:14:30, number1 wrote:
i assume thats a cid:49 k750i my old cid:36 could take alot better pics than that.
no you wrong, k750 dosent handle cloudy weather very well (i have hundreds with cid36 pics and nearlly all of them shoot in cloudy looks like this). ONLY daylight who looks really good.
its a whole different game when you take pics with super tweaked cam driver with K750..but with original drivers k750 is quite mediocre
AT LAST SOME FAIR COMPARE PICTURES...
------------------------------------------
Vipera where are you ???? (have you lost your tongue)...he he
-----------------------------------------------
Luci, can you make same comparing with K850 vs K750 ?????
_________________
I K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-08 11:27 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
my old cid:36 was alot better, yea the cid:36's had the better cam hardware. was fine in sunny or cloudy weather pics would blur very easily but not that bad. Also i was using some really old firmware & standard cam driver all the time, as i said it was hard to get sharp pics it liked to blur alot.
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-07-08 11:35 ] |
strizlow800
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM |
Well I have plenty of pics taken with my old W800, and most of the seems to be sharp and clear . WHile today's CID49 K750 cannot take that clear shots... I have tried myself...
|
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
yes plank i can do that ....but i don't know when because i'm going on vacation tonight...When i'm back I promise i will post a comparasion between N82 and K850 and K850vsK750.
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
who have said its a cid49 ??????
|
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
On 2008-07-08 12:49:48, Luci'sPower wrote:
yes plank i can do that ....but i don't know when because i'm going on vacation tonight...When i'm back I promise i will post a comparasion between N82 and K850 and K850vsK750.
Please do not post N82 vs K850 pictures, there are already several threads on these.And it has been seen from the comparison that N82 takes better pictures.Nevertheless N82 is awarded Best mobile imaging device 2008 by Technical Image Press Association |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
On 2008-07-08 12:15:42, Sirhackalot wrote:
very nice to see you have an honest comparison and not shaking one of the phones to give worst results.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-08 11:57
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support! 
