Esato

Forum > General discussions > Other manufacturers > Which 5MP camera is best LG Viewty or N95?

Previous  12
Author Which 5MP camera is best LG Viewty or N95?
CookiCrumble
W660 Black
Joined: Dec 18, 2007
Posts: 96
From: Oriental City
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 17:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-01-04 15:20:40, Daedalus85 wrote:
Also, the Viewty automaticlly slows the 120FPS video down to 30FPS making it slow motion.



why does it do that? [addsig]
Daedalus85
K750
Joined: Apr 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Suffolk, UK
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-01-04 19:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Because otherwise you'd have a 120FPS video that wouldn't play back right.

Average Joe is going to use this, and their not going to put videos from their phone onto their PC to watch, so the phone has to slow the videos down to 30FPS to make them viewable. What else are you really going to do with a 120FPS video anyway? :/
My opinions on this forum are that of my own and not of the company I work for.
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 21:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-01-04 19:12:43, Daedalus85 wrote:
Because otherwise you'd have a 120FPS video that wouldn't play back right.

Average Joe is going to use this, and their not going to put videos from their phone onto their PC to watch, so the phone has to slow the videos down to 30FPS to make them viewable. What else are you really going to do with a 120FPS video anyway? :/


The opposite of what you see when they're playing old silent movies today. The old movies were shot with a slower frame rate and when played with modern projectors, people move like they've had an overdose of caffeine . . .
CookiCrumble
W660 Black
Joined: Dec 18, 2007
Posts: 96
From: Oriental City
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 22:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-01-04 19:12:43, Daedalus85 wrote:
Average Joe is going to use this, and their not going to put videos from their phone onto their PC to watch, so the phone has to slow the videos down to 30FPS to make them viewable. What else are you really going to do with a 120FPS video anyway? :/



I always thought the higher the frame rate the better the picture quality?

[addsig]
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 22:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

I always thought the higher the frame rate the better the picture quality?

Better motion quality, actually. Well, up to 30fps.
gola
W900 white
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 22:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-01-04 13:56:08, Mizzle wrote:

On 2008-01-04 13:49:57, CookiCrumble wrote:
Thats very disappointing to say the least,oh well thats another positive for the N95.

Now for the next question,How does the Viewty's Schneider-Kreuznach lens compare with the N95's Carl Zeiss one?



Those are just names and has absolutely no influence on the outcome of the pictures.

quite clever if you ask me...
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!"
Proverbs 4: 7
CookiCrumble
W660 Black
Joined: Dec 18, 2007
Posts: 96
From: Oriental City
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 22:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-01-04 22:13:18, NightBlade wrote:

I always thought the higher the frame rate the better the picture quality?

Better motion quality, actually. Well, up to 30fps.


Better"motion"quality,wasn't that my original question?if you say better motion quality is upto 30fps then wouldn't be logical to think that 120fps would be of a even higher quality?or am i missing something here?

[addsig]
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2008-01-04 22:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

Better"motion"quality,wasn't that my original question?if you say better motion quality is upto 30fps then wouldn't be logical to think that 120fps would be of a even higher quality?or am i missing something here?

No, you said picture quality. That represents colours and resolution. The fps. are motion quality.
And again, no. Like I said, the human eye can differentiate the frames of a video up to 24-30fps. (so it's safe to make quality videos at 24 or higher fps.). 120 fps. is like overfilling the bucket.
QVGA
Nokia Lumia 1020
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-01-04 22:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
dont forget the bit rate of a video, its also vital for good quality.
Prakash
K550 Black
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 40
From: India
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-01-06 07:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
According to phonearena's camera comparison http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]son-Q4-2007-review-r_1889.html viewty is at the bottom.

_________________
PlanetCricket.net

[ This Message was edited by: Prakash on 2008-01-06 06:07 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi