| Author |
Ericsson goes to war with Samsung |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@axxxr - My answer to you here is what is POSTED on your . . . sig 
[addsig] |
|
|
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-11 03:53:11, axxxr wrote:
Yes its your opinion of course....but remember this is a  site and we really don't see kindly to disloyal members. 
whats so good about samsungs anyway?...Is it me,because i don't get it?
Anyway,the other day i was out buying some clothes and the nice looking female assistant in the shop noticed my K800 and asked me if it was any good,and of course that got me started,anyway to cut a long story short she said she really wanted to get the D900 and i basically had to explain to her how good was compared to samsung,so in the end i convinced her to go for the K800 and she was very thankfull and agreed.
|
|
How thankful? 
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
steele
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
Posts: 329
PM |
hmmm..Let's stick to the topic then I think Ericsson should win this one. Piracy is a crime and Samsung should pay a huge price for it.
[addsig] |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Seems to me that SE are only doing this cos Samsung are releasing new products alot quicker then what they are, its not about money its about jealousy. SE need to stop being idiots and start getting there products out on time its taken a yr for the P990i to come out and there doing stunts like that when consumers are waiting im sorry but until I see a phone by SE I like and its out on time its Samsung for me.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Let's just see what will be the outcome in the court room . . . I think Samsung will not be venturing in 'some' things without having a FULL knowledge at . . .
[addsig] |
dancingfate
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-11 04:27:16, miss uk wrote:
Seems to me that SE are only doing this cos Samsung are releasing new products alot quicker then what they are, its not about money its about jealousy. SE need to stop being idiots and start getting there products out on time its taken a yr for the P990i to come out and there doing stunts like that when consumers are waiting im sorry but until I see a phone by SE I like and its out on time its Samsung for me.
This message was posted from a WAP device
|
|
The company that was suing Samsung is Ericsson, not Sony Ericsson. So it's not related with SE' jealousy to Samsung.
Why cant you see the difference between Ericsson and Sony Ericsson.
Yes, of course I know that Ericsson has shares in Sony Ericsson, as well as Sony.
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@rifqi - I guess that's . . . Part and Parcel dude . . .
[addsig] |
shaliron
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM |
Ericsson should win, regardless of our biases. The evidence is clear.
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood. Source: WikipediaWinner of: Best Thread (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Post (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Signature 2007, and 2nd Best Nickname 2007. |
Krubach
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM |
I don't think the lawsuit will go all the way...
Ericsson is just pressuring Samsung to get things done right:
PAY ROYALTIES!
[addsig] |
kulorex
Joined: Mar 13, 2006
Posts: 224
From: Freetown, Sierra Leone
PM |
it is Ericsson's right to pursue defaulters in their patent agreement. if Samsung is one, then it should face the court and suffer whatever penalty arouse there. |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-11 12:07:15, kulorex wrote:
it is Ericsson's right to pursue defaulters in their patent agreement. if Samsung is one, then it should face the court and suffer whatever penalty arouse there.
|
|
@kulor - arouse 
Be it as it may . . . some 'technicalities' will be settled out-of-court me thinks . . .
[addsig] |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
inforworld Article
The U.S. International Trade Commission said Thursday it will investigate complaints by Ericsson and its Swedish parent company that Samsung Electronics and two of its U.S. companies violated patents used its mobile handsets.
Ericsson and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson filed a complaint against Samsung's Korean parent company, Samsung Telecommunications America and Samsung Electronics America, alleging that Samsung's importation of its patented mobile phones and components violated U.S. law, according to an ITC statement.
The ITC set no timetable for the investigation, but said it would establish a target date for the completion of the investigation to within 45 days of its institution.
Ericsson filed suit against Samsung in a Texas court August 2, alleging that Samsung is infringing on its patents for mobile handsets and some of their components. The case is part of legal action taken by the Swedish company against its Korean rival and former partner since February, after the two failed to renew a 2002 licensing arrangement for patented technology. The deal expired at the end of 2005.
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2006-08-11 04:08
