Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Comparision N 3250 & SE K750i camera

Previous  12
Author Comparision N 3250 & SE K750i camera
vishone
T68 gold
Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Who said the guy who took pics with K750i , adjusted it to the best settings??
the images took with k750i are grainy.. anyone who has a k750i knows


The images taken with k750i are not grainy unless its in night mode.
As earlier said.. dust on lense is amajor factor for poor quality shots.
..there are just too many settings in K750i and optimal settings does provide a very good picture unlike shown in this link(macro, white balance,fine-normal settings..etc)
rockygali
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:


The images taken with k750i are not grainy unless its in night mode.




even in broad daylight? i guess the point here is that.. a 3250 doesnt have too much tweaking on it thats why the results are like that.. so to keep the competition fair and square.. we will not make adjustments to K750. and thus this falls down to one.. auto focus... if we can shut auto-focus off.. then we might call it another name... doh!
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..."
vladoj
K750
Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Posts: 34
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM
Posted: 2006-02-14 12:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@rockygali
Great shots, keep them coming (just to admire the quality of K750i camera)

maybe some night shots would make significant difference.
vishone
T68 gold
Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2006-02-14 18:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-02-14 11:29:53, rockygali wrote:
Quote:


The images taken with k750i are not grainy unless its in night mode.




i guess the point here is that.. a 3250 doesnt have too much tweaking on it thats why the results are like that..



I never used 3250 and so no idea about its settings but your pics in the earlier posts in this sections cleared all doubts regarding the quality of pics taken by SE K750i . Those pics were excellent.
ares
P1
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM
Posted: 2006-02-14 19:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
rockygali those results come not only from the autofocus, but even more from the macro mode...k750 macro mode kicks ass, and makes it impossible for the 3250 to obtain those results (because it just canīt focus so near the subjects)

hereīs another example (k750 photo without any editing):




its impossible for the 3250 to get these results
_________________
k750i + hbh 600 + hpm 70

http://pbase.com/ares - photography by ares aka antonioj

[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2006-02-14 18:08 ]
rockygali
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-02-15 02:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
copy that guys!!! big thanks... isnt it too obvious that i hate K750...

@Arez
yep buddy, youre right about the macro mode... it packs a big punch. But on my shots, trust me guys i did not use the macro mode.. like i said "NO TWEAKING" just to show off what can a K750 do.

and i think etaab is a good example of a very keen K750i user... she gots da best shots here... go find her posts this thread.

cheers to a good life!
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..."
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi