Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Comparision N 3250 & SE K750i camera

12  Next
Author Comparision N 3250 & SE K750i camera
vladoj
K750
Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Posts: 34
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 14:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Not that i doubt in K750i camera posibilities, but i saw this http://www.mobile-review.com/review/nokia-3250.shtml where there is a comparision between these two cameras and altough the author says that K750i is better if you look at the pictures you will see that that is not the case. I think that the author didn't took the pictures properly, but would like just to be shure to see another comparision. So please if anyone has both phones, take a couple of identical pictures and post them.
weezur
K810 Ivory
Joined: Dec 11, 2004
Posts: 31
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 15:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
if u ask me, those pics taken from the Nokia are very similar with the ones taken by my SE S700i, only in 2MP. quite the blurry effect in contrast to the K750's shots which gives sharper details, as you can see from the objects in the background.
vladoj
K750
Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Posts: 34
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 15:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'm not saing that 3250 has better camera, but why are all K750i pictures so overexposed. Because of that the whole picture is blurry or out of focus.
Arne Anka
Sony Xperia P
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 16:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Probably because his K750 is faulty. Never seen that bad K750 pictures before.
etaab
Nokia N8
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 16:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Id guess the reason his K750i pictures were so overexposed because there was lots of dust in the camera lens.

My K700i and T610 pictures always looked like that, until i removed the dust.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab !
Twix
K750
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 95
From: London
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 21:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Awful comparison.

Never have I seen such poor quality k750i photos anywhere. Either his phone is faulty, or his piss poor at using a camera phone.
dotsis
P910
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 149
From: here, there and everywhere.
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 21:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@etaab. . the k700 and t610 pictures were always bad, with or without dust covered lenses!!

This message was posted from a WAP device

*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 21:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
K750i fonecams do captures sharp images 'comparable' with that of the S700i ! I haven't seen the wonders of this Nokia 3250 though [addsig]
etaab
Nokia N8
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 21:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Meaning comparably better than the S700i ?

Regarding the K700i, i thought it had a very good VGA camera. The 3250's camera isnt actually as bad as i thought it would be.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab !
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 22:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@etaab - Yeah, or even BETTER mate! I think the S7 was equipped with a 3 MP cam and NOT a 1.3 MP one [addsig]
etaab
Nokia N8
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 22:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Illiterate huh ? 1.3mp means one point three megapixel.

I presume you're joking, nobody is that retarded, surely ?
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab !
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2006-02-13 22:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@etaab - Yeah, sure I know the difference between a 1.3 and a 2.0 MP camfone = 'image-sharpness-quality' dude ! I was BASING my opinion on the way I 'saw' the images being uploaded here . . . (S700i/K750i Pics Thread). I know that there's some sort of 'magic' when that cam on the S7 was placed ! Basing again, on the images uploaded here . . . the S7i do OUTBEST the images taken from a W550i considering that both have a 1.3 MP cams . . . [addsig]
vladoj
K750
Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Posts: 34
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM
Posted: 2006-02-14 08:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
But I can't find any other N 3250 pictures for comparision. Anyone has any links?
massimax
W980
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Posts: 27
PM
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

the S7i do OUTBEST the images taken from a W550i considering that both have a 1.3 MP cams . . .



that's becouse the S700 has a CCD camera and the W550 has a CMOS one
rockygali
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
ok here is what i can contribute to this discussion...

ive made some comparison with the said devices...

SETTINGS: indoor, flourescent lights..., no tweaking with the phone's cam.

from a 3250's perspective

(shot 1)



(shot 2)



-----------------------

now from a K750's perspective

(shot 1)


(shot 2)


ive made these series of shots to point out the very a good feature in image devices, and that is "auto-focus". it sez it all.
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..."
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi