| Author |
N82 v C902 digital camera mag review |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-26 10:03:30, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
i think he masturbate watching that review...
correct. i wonder if his family knows he's having an affair with SE?
|
|
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
I dont understand why they said the Nokia screen is hard to read under sunlight. Nokia is known for its screen being easy to read in strong light. On another thread i seen some N82 pics and they looked very sharp. |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-08-26 11:44:00, Bonovox wrote:
I dont understand why they said the Nokia screen is hard to read under sunlight. Nokia is known for its screen being easy to read in strong light.
Tell that to my friend who recently bought a N95 8GB. The screen is virtually unusable in direct sunlight!
Oh, and BTW, you guys are taking this too far.
|
Fanofmodi
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Posts: 191
From: Hindustan
PM |
On 2008-08-26 10:51:21, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-08-26 10:03:30, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
i think he masturbate watching that review...
correct. i wonder if his family knows he's having an affair with SE?
Whats the problem if he has a affair with SE. Are u his girlfriend? |
DickySnapples
Joined: Dec 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-26 10:33:10, alex_on wrote:
@Guto_ViP
it seems that n82 dosent have red eye corection .
it does ...
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
There is nothing wrong with a good debate or argument though yes some comments are going too far. Though maybe we all take it too seriously after all its just a phone and whatever we want to buy as long as we are happy then thats that. Im still going for the Nokia. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
you guys are taking this too far
we didn't created cult of C902, I will not point who did this. most people are only laughing when watching at all attempts to show how much C902 is above everything else. so, we don't care about C902 all we want is to have some fun from this silly cult
one very anonymous Esatonian many times wrote that C902 can easily beat K800 in low-light photography. unfortunately when I asked for pictures he can't show nothing more than empty words. tell me, what else I can do in this situation? I can only laugh and don't tell me that this is rude
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-26 12:04:56, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-08-26 11:44:00, Bonovox wrote:
I dont understand why they said the Nokia screen is hard to read under sunlight. Nokia is known for its screen being easy to read in strong light.
Tell that to my friend who recently bought a N95 8GB. The screen is virtually unusable in direct sunlight!
Oh, and BTW, you guys are taking this too far.
not half as far as he takes
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-08-26 10:51:21, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-08-26 10:03:30, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
i think he masturbate watching that review...
correct. i wonder if his family knows he's having an affair with SE?
mastrubate ???? one Pakki and one Serb....im sure you dont mastrubate.....you getting on with the sheeps instead....eeehhh
(and please, dont start some crap about calling hard names...just look at yourself)
can you never stay on topic ?
@Raiderski...why do you even qoute all this answers IF YOU DONT CARE ????
it seems you care A LOT if you look at all your posts about C902. (i see a lot of people who dont care....you know how ?)
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-26 14:26 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
why? hmm... stupid question = stupid answer - because:
1. I want
2. replying is not forbidden
3. I don't have my own sheep and I don't know what to do in spare time
enough or not enough?
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
All I can say is that while there are many who claim C902 is way better than anything else, there are just as many people who denigrate the C902 claiming it is shit and only the KING N82 is the one true reigning monarch of camera phones.
I mean look at this with perspect. Both cameras are about as good as eachother, with advantages in one area outweighed by disadvantages in another. Where one is strong the other is weak and vice versa. To self righteously claim that EITHER camera is much better than the other is to show oneself to be a biased fanboy.
To come on with this antogonism towards SE is no better than the fanboys who jump up and down claiming the C902 is perfect. The fact is the C902 is an excellent camera phone, one of the best on the market. That doesn't have to mean the N82 is crap! The N82 can be good also. Why do people get caught up in this either/or bullshit??
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Because some people have bullshit stuck up in their minds. And the bigger BS is that they get away with it, just like its happening right now as i type
|
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
It's all Bonovox's fault
@Raiderski: It's the time now, read wrecked_porsche's sig 
On 2008-08-26 16:04:16, max_wedge wrote:
To come on with this antogonism towards SE is no better than the fanboys who jump up and down claiming the C902 is perfect. The fact is the C902 is an excellent camera phone, one of the best on the market. That doesn't have to mean the N82 is crap! The N82 can be good also.
I completely agree.  |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yes of course its all my fault you choose to insult each other. I only started a discussion.  |
Pitzon
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Sweden
PM |
Youre absolutely right Max Wedge
Its really funny how we sit and argue about wich phone sucks the most at taking pictures Yes i mean Suck because still compared to a real digicam our phones suck
But i can see how its important to know in wich area our phones suck more and in wich situations it sucks a little bit less
As i am on my third N82 now and i have owned two c902 i can just say how i see it.
Outdoor and in good light/sunshine the c902 really rocks. It handles almost every situation well and you are very unlikely to get a crappy picture if you just follow basic photo "know how". Shooting with the sun in your back and against the object and so on.. It handles landscape pictures better than N82 and i have never seen a mobile phone who captures trees and stuf like that so beautifully. It also rules in Makro where i got really crisp and detailed/sharp pictures. It has better camera controls and the touch-buttons works really well. And the most important factor that NO one here has mentioned is that the c902 remembers your settings so next time you flip the lens cover open, the cam are adjusted like you left it. Imagine this when you spend a day in sunshine or a cloudy day and the phone always is ready to shot with your beloved settings each time you want to take a picture.. The c902 works really well in plain auto also and thats very important i think.
The only downside i had with my c902:s where indoor shooting. It was much more difficult to capture nice indoor pictures. Dont know if this has to do with how the focus system works or what. But just as faultless as it was outdoors, just as difficult my c902 where indoors. The face-detection is a joke and really slow. The % of good pictures inddors where rally bad compared to my N82:s
The N82 are an impressive piece. It is butt ugly compared to the beautiful and slim c902 but build quality arent bad for being made of plastic. Itīs really feature packed with GPS and Wifi and all that. Bigger screen and so on. I think it is less good in auto than the c902, it takes some adjusting of the cam to get the best out of every situation just as said earlier. When adjusted right it takes beautiful pictures and it rules indoors with the strong xenon flash. The % of my indoor shots without flash are also better than c902. So in my eyes itīs the best "allrounder". The N82 doesent remember your settings so if you are at the beach a sunny day you will have to fiddle around with the settings of the cam every darn time you want to shoot a picture and change wb to "sunny" and stuf like that. This is really annoying compared to the c902. The N82 screen are harder to see in strong sunlight just as someone said and the N82 has worse battery life.
So i think itīs a close call, if you want style and a slim phone and shoot mainly outdoors and in "auto-mode" go for the c902. If you want the best allrounder get the N82. Bare in mind that the N82 is almost twice as thick though
I also think all reviews should be read with a little bit of common sense from us users. The reviewers are most likely to shoot in plain auto and havenīt got the time to spend hours and hours to find the best settings for every situations. The results can be really different when someone adjust the cam. Like locking ISO to low and lower EV to get a darker pic with less noice and stuf like that.
And itīs me you should blame guys, im the reason Plank bought the c902
[ This Message was edited by: Pitzon on 2008-08-26 16:30 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-26 10:51
