| Author |
N82 v C902 digital camera mag review |
iSE
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 39
PM |
@troublesam:
Do you have a C902?
I want you to take a pic of a common object and post it full size. I will take a pic of the same object with my N82. And let the people decide which is better.
Full size please. Stop worshipping that magazine and take some real 10/10 pic.
If you dont have neither of these two phones, i dont know why are you judging them. |
|
|
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
I think the thing is, who cares? They are both camera phones so their quality can never be described as good when compared to a real digicam. And the quality of both are fairly similar obviously, or there would just be no argument here.
Buuuut I guess you've all gone so far with the argument that you can't give up.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
iSE
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 39
PM |
On 2008-08-26 04:58:21, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
I think the thing is, who cares? They are both camera phones so their quality can never be described as good when compared to a real digicam. And the quality of both are fairly similar obviously, or there would just be no argument here.
Buuuut I guess you've all gone so far with the argument that you can't give up.
It's not about the argument, it's about a magazine that wrongly wrote an article and now some people get the whole wrong idea in their head.
I've never seen a gadget webpage/blog to rank an consumer electronic 10/10, clear examples are Cnet, GSMarena, dpreview, pcmag, etc. I would call this a lack of professionalism.
But anyways, forums are to discuss these kinds of topics right? You can't never have all people agree with same thing =P
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-26 05:14:15, iSE wrote:
I've never seen a gadget webpage/blog to rank an consumer electronic 10/10, clear examples are Cnet, GSMarena, dpreview, pcmag, etc. I would call this a lack of professionalism.
Or lack of integrity. I bet that hack got paid to write that rave review.
|
Mige
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Posts: 453
PM |
c902 >> n82 
[addsig] |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
True. I suppose you're right. I have a C902 and have never tried an N82, and I'd hardly say the C902 should have a 10/10 rating. I mean, its good for a mobile phone camera, but I'd assume the N82 to be around the same, so should have got the 10/10 too if the review was being fair (Not that 10/10 is the right score).
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
Guto_ViP
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
|
20/10... very good point!
Love or hate me...  Nokia 5120 -> Nokia 6120 -> SE T200 -> Motorola V800 -> SE W800 (stay with my wife) - > SE K800 (stay with my mom) -> Nokia N82 Silver -> Nokia N82 Black Edition - Firmware v30.0.019 -> What is the next??. |
iSE
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 39
PM |
Well, I am still waiting for the C902 pic so i can take a similar one with my N82 for comparison. |
Intrigue
Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 31
PM |
N82 ftw  |
Guto_ViP
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
|
One night shot.... hehehehehehhe
Full and EXIF: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=14072
Love or hate me... Nokia 5120 -> Nokia 6120 -> SE T200 -> Motorola V800 -> SE W800 (stay with my wife) - > SE K800 (stay with my mom) -> Nokia N82 Silver -> Nokia N82 Black Edition - Firmware v30.0.019 -> What is the next??. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
can i ask just some simple questions ????
(i prefer that you at least have use/tried N82 and C902...so you at least have some feeling what we talking about..whats the point otherwise to speak about build quality, functions, focus, etc, ???)
do C902 have better build quality ???? (yes or no)
do C902 have a better screen ??? (yes or no) (im not talking about the among of colors, just how it behaves)
do C902 have better camera features/functions ??? (yes or no)
do C902 have a more faster & accurate focus ??? (yes or no)
do C902 have easier to produce accurate brightness-level ??? (yes or no)
do C902 produce better details, (especially on larger scenes) ???? (yes or no)
even Esatos Pitzon who actaully owns both N82 (black & silver) say himself that N82 is not that accurate on Focus & auto WB, etc, compared to C902.
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-26 09:18 ] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
guys be ready for tons of the same pictures of that review posted by plank
i think he masturbate watching that review...
OnePlus 8 |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
except of that page where pics from low-light and night conditions are. after all it's good to see that finally somebody praised C902
|
alex_on
Joined: May 31, 2008
Posts: 19
PM |
@Guto_ViP
it seems that n82 dosent have red eye corection . i think c902 produces more accurate coulors and better details and also have stronger macro .
@iSE
its impossible . because the light condition should be the same . |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
what a load of rubbish! So the C902 gets a 10/10 rating does it? What about the colour red which is still pink? and the purple fringing? The lack of xenon flash? Sure 7 or 8 is okay but 10/10 is ridiculous! And they give nokia 7/10! Now that is crap.
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2008-08-26 09:44 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-26 04:50
