Posted by laffen
Nokia has released a couple of new example photos captured with the 41 megapixel camera phone Nokia 808 PureView. All images should have increased exposure
Esato News
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2012-03-12 09:37 ]
Posted by admad
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-03-12 10:02 ]
Posted by worf1000
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
WOW, a Nokia fanboy
The more amount of mega pixel said nothing about quality.
Posted by mriley
On 2012-03-13 01:11:08, worf1000 wrote:
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
WOW, a Nokia fanboy
The more amount of mega pixel said nothing about quality.
Depends what you call quality, the reso lution is much greater so a sharper and more detailed image is produced. I would say that improves quality.
Leave brand bias out of it for once...
Posted by admad
On 2012-03-13 01:11:08, worf1000 wrote:
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
WOW, a Nokia fanboy
The more amount of mega pixel said nothing about quality.
Nokia fanboy?:D I use SE phones only for 7 years now. And I'm not saying WOW at amount of mega pixel, I'm saying WOW at quality of photos... Just look at them, even at full resolution, in theory it should produce low quality, but it doesn't. 38MP photo is much clearer than 12MP photo from Xperia S. In case of Xperia S You are right, mega pixel says nothing
And on top of that Nokia has xenon flash. It's real shame that the phone itself is pretty bad...
Posted by etaab
Why is it bad ? im sure apart from the low screen resolution it being quite good to use. Sure Symbian isnt being supported much now but its still a very capable OS even if it lacks the quantity of apps of Android.
Posted by admad
On 2012-03-13 23:12:37, etaab wrote:
Why is it bad ? im sure apart from the low screen resolution it being quite good to use. Sure Symbian isnt being supported much now but its still a very capable OS even if it lacks the quantity of apps of Android.
Hmm You are right, the screen resolution is the only hardware concern(and CPU, it could be dual-core, even if it can record 1080p video, I've seen it stutter, maybe final software will fix this problem). I'm just so "addicted" to Android I consider a phone with Symbian pretty useless. I mean, all the apps I have would be gone, google sync, calendar, contacts, flash in web browser.
Posted by etaab
Symbian has flash in browsers. I still use my N8 as my main phone as it hasnt had a worthy competitor imo for its all round complete package. The camera was the main selling point however.
I wont be buying a Symbian phone again even though i think the OS is great.