| Author |
More example photos captured with the Nokia 808 PureView camera phone |
laffen
Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
Nokia has released a couple of new example photos captured with the 41 megapixel camera phone Nokia 808 PureView. All images should have increased exposure
Esato News
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2012-03-12 09:37 ] |
|
|
admad
Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-03-12 10:02 ] |
worf1000
Joined: Nov 01, 2011
Posts: 265
PM |
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
WOW, a Nokia fanboy
The more amount of mega pixel said nothing about quality. |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
On 2012-03-13 01:11:08, worf1000 wrote:
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
WOW, a Nokia fanboy
The more amount of mega pixel said nothing about quality.
Depends what you call quality, the reso lution is much greater so a sharper and more detailed image is produced. I would say that improves quality.
Leave brand bias out of it for once... 
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!  ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
admad
Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
On 2012-03-13 01:11:08, worf1000 wrote:
Damn You Nokia! I can't look the same way at photos from other phones... I mean, the new Xperia S 12MP is so crappy compared to PureView... I want this on Android -.-
WOW, a Nokia fanboy
The more amount of mega pixel said nothing about quality.
Nokia fanboy?:D I use SE phones only for 7 years now. And I'm not saying WOW at amount of mega pixel, I'm saying WOW at quality of photos... Just look at them, even at full resolution, in theory it should produce low quality, but it doesn't. 38MP photo is much clearer than 12MP photo from Xperia S. In case of Xperia S You are right, mega pixel says nothing  And on top of that Nokia has xenon flash. It's real shame that the phone itself is pretty bad... |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Why is it bad ? im sure apart from the low screen resolution it being quite good to use. Sure Symbian isnt being supported much now but its still a very capable OS even if it lacks the quantity of apps of Android.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
admad
Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
On 2012-03-13 23:12:37, etaab wrote:
Why is it bad ? im sure apart from the low screen resolution it being quite good to use. Sure Symbian isnt being supported much now but its still a very capable OS even if it lacks the quantity of apps of Android.
Hmm You are right, the screen resolution is the only hardware concern(and CPU, it could be dual-core, even if it can record 1080p video, I've seen it stutter, maybe final software will fix this problem). I'm just so "addicted" to Android I consider a phone with Symbian pretty useless. I mean, all the apps I have would be gone, google sync, calendar, contacts, flash in web browser. |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Symbian has flash in browsers. I still use my N8 as my main phone as it hasnt had a worthy competitor imo for its all round complete package. The camera was the main selling point however.
I wont be buying a Symbian phone again even though i think the OS is great.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
|
|
Posted: 2012-03-12 10:31
