| Author |
Samsung E330 |
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
I've to make a phone decision for someone. Is this phone good? It costs a lil more than the k508i but has around 2mb lesser memory. How is the battery? Can it be recommended over the k508i?
Ayush  |
|
|
Pradhika
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM |
It has a talk time of just 220 minutes.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
Why samsung?? 
T230 >> T610 >> Ngage QD >> N73 >> N85 >> Omnia HD >> And countless other review units |
Mrb 18
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: 299
From:
PM |
Featurevise the Samsung loses to the SE, no mp3-ringsignals, no videorecording. When it comes to batteryperformance past experienses says the Samsung fares fairly bad when compared to the SE!
Power to the people=SAAB turbo |
dancingfate
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM |
Why not you just by K508 and forget other phones?
K508 is a good choice.
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
Because ayush's had a bad experience with a k508.
T230 >> T610 >> Ngage QD >> N73 >> N85 >> Omnia HD >> And countless other review units |
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
It doesn't have vid rec? !
This message was posted from a WAP device |
Mrb 18
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: 299
From:
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-07-05 11:41:31, Ayush wrote:
It doesn't have vid rec? !
This message was posted from a WAP device
|
|
According to this test (in Swedish) it doesnt http://www.mobilforum.se/default_display.aspx?id=1508
Power to the people=SAAB turbo |
Sammy_boy
Joined: Mar 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
PM, WWW
|
I had an E330 as a free upgrade for a while, I have to admit I wasn't a big fan of the phone, I ended up selling it. From what I can remember, texting was tricky, battery didn't last very long, and wap browsing was slow and tricky too. Transferring pictures and things to and from the phone was a pain too, as it has no connectivity whatsoever, and you have to use a data cable (which wasn't supplied with my phone) using Samsung's software, which was unreliable at best. It did look and feel nice, though!
Personally, I'd go for the K508. I know you've had a bad experience, but that may just have been a dud phone. Save your money and get the K508, or perhaps a K700i if your budget will stretch to it 
"All it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke
|
Pradhika
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM |
@Sammy. There you are. K700i stands taller at that price.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
Thanks one and all . . Guess the samsung's off the list
This message was posted from a WAP device |
|
|
Posted: 2005-07-05 08:51
